Cargando…

Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine whether the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer is an effective adjunct for training both junior and senior surgical residents. METHODS: During the 2009–2010 academic year, 20 of 27 surgical residents at our institution completed traini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gamarra, Aldo, Hogle, Nancy J., Azab, Basem, Bloom, Scott W., Widmann, Warren D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23477164
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597717185
_version_ 1782247704249761792
author Gamarra, Aldo
Hogle, Nancy J.
Azab, Basem
Bloom, Scott W.
Widmann, Warren D.
author_facet Gamarra, Aldo
Hogle, Nancy J.
Azab, Basem
Bloom, Scott W.
Widmann, Warren D.
author_sort Gamarra, Aldo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine whether the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer is an effective adjunct for training both junior and senior surgical residents. METHODS: During the 2009–2010 academic year, 20 of 27 surgical residents at our institution completed training with the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer. These 20 residents took an identical 25-question pre- and posttest prepared in-house by a senior laparoscopic surgeon, based on the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy program content. Included within the SimPraxis program is a multiple data point scoring system. For our reporting purposes, we divided the residents into 2 groups, junior (PGY 1-2; n=11) and senior (PGY 3-5; n=9). RESULTS: The junior residents demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in their post-test scores (P=.001). On the contrary, the senior residents showed nonstatistically significant minor improvement in their examination scores (P=.09). While, the pretest scores were significantly higher for the senior residents compared with the junior residents (P=.003), the post-test scores were nonsignificantly different between the senior vs. the junior residents (P=.07). There was no significant difference between the time it took junior and senior residents to complete the SimPraxis program. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that junior residents benefitted the most from the SimPraxis training program. Requiring junior surgical residents to complete both skills and cognitive training programs may be an effective adjunct in preparation for participation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3481228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34812282012-11-02 Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer Gamarra, Aldo Hogle, Nancy J. Azab, Basem Bloom, Scott W. Widmann, Warren D. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine whether the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer is an effective adjunct for training both junior and senior surgical residents. METHODS: During the 2009–2010 academic year, 20 of 27 surgical residents at our institution completed training with the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer. These 20 residents took an identical 25-question pre- and posttest prepared in-house by a senior laparoscopic surgeon, based on the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy program content. Included within the SimPraxis program is a multiple data point scoring system. For our reporting purposes, we divided the residents into 2 groups, junior (PGY 1-2; n=11) and senior (PGY 3-5; n=9). RESULTS: The junior residents demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in their post-test scores (P=.001). On the contrary, the senior residents showed nonstatistically significant minor improvement in their examination scores (P=.09). While, the pretest scores were significantly higher for the senior residents compared with the junior residents (P=.003), the post-test scores were nonsignificantly different between the senior vs. the junior residents (P=.07). There was no significant difference between the time it took junior and senior residents to complete the SimPraxis program. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that junior residents benefitted the most from the SimPraxis training program. Requiring junior surgical residents to complete both skills and cognitive training programs may be an effective adjunct in preparation for participation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3481228/ /pubmed/23477164 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597717185 Text en © 2012 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Gamarra, Aldo
Hogle, Nancy J.
Azab, Basem
Bloom, Scott W.
Widmann, Warren D.
Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer
title Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer
title_full Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer
title_fullStr Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer
title_short Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer
title_sort assessing the value of the simpraxis™ laparoscopic cholecystectomy trainer
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23477164
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597717185
work_keys_str_mv AT gamarraaldo assessingthevalueofthesimpraxislaparoscopiccholecystectomytrainer
AT hoglenancyj assessingthevalueofthesimpraxislaparoscopiccholecystectomytrainer
AT azabbasem assessingthevalueofthesimpraxislaparoscopiccholecystectomytrainer
AT bloomscottw assessingthevalueofthesimpraxislaparoscopiccholecystectomytrainer
AT widmannwarrend assessingthevalueofthesimpraxislaparoscopiccholecystectomytrainer