Cargando…
Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine whether the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer is an effective adjunct for training both junior and senior surgical residents. METHODS: During the 2009–2010 academic year, 20 of 27 surgical residents at our institution completed traini...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23477164 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597717185 |
_version_ | 1782247704249761792 |
---|---|
author | Gamarra, Aldo Hogle, Nancy J. Azab, Basem Bloom, Scott W. Widmann, Warren D. |
author_facet | Gamarra, Aldo Hogle, Nancy J. Azab, Basem Bloom, Scott W. Widmann, Warren D. |
author_sort | Gamarra, Aldo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine whether the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer is an effective adjunct for training both junior and senior surgical residents. METHODS: During the 2009–2010 academic year, 20 of 27 surgical residents at our institution completed training with the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer. These 20 residents took an identical 25-question pre- and posttest prepared in-house by a senior laparoscopic surgeon, based on the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy program content. Included within the SimPraxis program is a multiple data point scoring system. For our reporting purposes, we divided the residents into 2 groups, junior (PGY 1-2; n=11) and senior (PGY 3-5; n=9). RESULTS: The junior residents demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in their post-test scores (P=.001). On the contrary, the senior residents showed nonstatistically significant minor improvement in their examination scores (P=.09). While, the pretest scores were significantly higher for the senior residents compared with the junior residents (P=.003), the post-test scores were nonsignificantly different between the senior vs. the junior residents (P=.07). There was no significant difference between the time it took junior and senior residents to complete the SimPraxis program. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that junior residents benefitted the most from the SimPraxis training program. Requiring junior surgical residents to complete both skills and cognitive training programs may be an effective adjunct in preparation for participation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3481228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34812282012-11-02 Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer Gamarra, Aldo Hogle, Nancy J. Azab, Basem Bloom, Scott W. Widmann, Warren D. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine whether the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer is an effective adjunct for training both junior and senior surgical residents. METHODS: During the 2009–2010 academic year, 20 of 27 surgical residents at our institution completed training with the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer. These 20 residents took an identical 25-question pre- and posttest prepared in-house by a senior laparoscopic surgeon, based on the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy program content. Included within the SimPraxis program is a multiple data point scoring system. For our reporting purposes, we divided the residents into 2 groups, junior (PGY 1-2; n=11) and senior (PGY 3-5; n=9). RESULTS: The junior residents demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in their post-test scores (P=.001). On the contrary, the senior residents showed nonstatistically significant minor improvement in their examination scores (P=.09). While, the pretest scores were significantly higher for the senior residents compared with the junior residents (P=.003), the post-test scores were nonsignificantly different between the senior vs. the junior residents (P=.07). There was no significant difference between the time it took junior and senior residents to complete the SimPraxis program. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that junior residents benefitted the most from the SimPraxis training program. Requiring junior surgical residents to complete both skills and cognitive training programs may be an effective adjunct in preparation for participation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3481228/ /pubmed/23477164 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597717185 Text en © 2012 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Gamarra, Aldo Hogle, Nancy J. Azab, Basem Bloom, Scott W. Widmann, Warren D. Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer |
title | Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer |
title_full | Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer |
title_fullStr | Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer |
title_short | Assessing the Value of the SimPraxis™ Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer |
title_sort | assessing the value of the simpraxis™ laparoscopic cholecystectomy trainer |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23477164 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597717185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gamarraaldo assessingthevalueofthesimpraxislaparoscopiccholecystectomytrainer AT hoglenancyj assessingthevalueofthesimpraxislaparoscopiccholecystectomytrainer AT azabbasem assessingthevalueofthesimpraxislaparoscopiccholecystectomytrainer AT bloomscottw assessingthevalueofthesimpraxislaparoscopiccholecystectomytrainer AT widmannwarrend assessingthevalueofthesimpraxislaparoscopiccholecystectomytrainer |