Cargando…

Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure

BACKGROUND: Fairness in financial contribution for health was determined by WHO (World Health Report, 2000) as the third goal of health systems which is measured by fairness in financial contribution index (FFCI). The aim of this study was to estimate FFCI and quantify extent of catastrophic househo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daneshkohan, A, Karami, M, Najafi, F, Matin, B Karami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23113061
_version_ 1782247781220483072
author Daneshkohan, A
Karami, M
Najafi, F
Matin, B Karami
author_facet Daneshkohan, A
Karami, M
Najafi, F
Matin, B Karami
author_sort Daneshkohan, A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fairness in financial contribution for health was determined by WHO (World Health Report, 2000) as the third goal of health systems which is measured by fairness in financial contribution index (FFCI). The aim of this study was to estimate FFCI and quantify extent of catastrophic household heath expenditures. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study during May 2008. Subjects were chosen by “Systematic Random sampling” among residents of Maskan’s population-based research center (Maskan Center) in Kermanshah, Iran. After completing informed consent form, we collected data using a questionnaire by interview with head of family. In order to describing data and estimating FFCI, we used descriptive statistics and WHO methodology, respectively. Households with catastrophic expenditures and impoverished households were defined as those with health expenditures over 40% and 50% of their ability to pay, respectively. RESULTS: The mean age of head of families was 48.96±12.86 years. From 189; 12.7% of household’s heads were female. 75.1% of households were covered by at least one health insurance scheme. FFCI was 0.57. The proportion of households facing catastrophic health expenditures was 22.2% (95% CI=16.3%–28.1%) CONCLUSION: The rate of FFCI among participants implied an inequality in health financing contribution. In addition, many of households (22.2%) faced catastrophic health expenditures while according to WHO estimation, the figure in the whole country was 2% in 1999. Our study revealed the importance of protecting households against the costs of ill-health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3481728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34817282012-10-30 Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure Daneshkohan, A Karami, M Najafi, F Matin, B Karami Iran J Public Health Original Article BACKGROUND: Fairness in financial contribution for health was determined by WHO (World Health Report, 2000) as the third goal of health systems which is measured by fairness in financial contribution index (FFCI). The aim of this study was to estimate FFCI and quantify extent of catastrophic household heath expenditures. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study during May 2008. Subjects were chosen by “Systematic Random sampling” among residents of Maskan’s population-based research center (Maskan Center) in Kermanshah, Iran. After completing informed consent form, we collected data using a questionnaire by interview with head of family. In order to describing data and estimating FFCI, we used descriptive statistics and WHO methodology, respectively. Households with catastrophic expenditures and impoverished households were defined as those with health expenditures over 40% and 50% of their ability to pay, respectively. RESULTS: The mean age of head of families was 48.96±12.86 years. From 189; 12.7% of household’s heads were female. 75.1% of households were covered by at least one health insurance scheme. FFCI was 0.57. The proportion of households facing catastrophic health expenditures was 22.2% (95% CI=16.3%–28.1%) CONCLUSION: The rate of FFCI among participants implied an inequality in health financing contribution. In addition, many of households (22.2%) faced catastrophic health expenditures while according to WHO estimation, the figure in the whole country was 2% in 1999. Our study revealed the importance of protecting households against the costs of ill-health. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2011-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3481728/ /pubmed/23113061 Text en Copyright © Iranian Public Health Association & Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Daneshkohan, A
Karami, M
Najafi, F
Matin, B Karami
Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure
title Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure
title_full Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure
title_fullStr Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure
title_full_unstemmed Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure
title_short Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure
title_sort household catastrophic health expenditure
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23113061
work_keys_str_mv AT daneshkohana householdcatastrophichealthexpenditure
AT karamim householdcatastrophichealthexpenditure
AT najafif householdcatastrophichealthexpenditure
AT matinbkarami householdcatastrophichealthexpenditure