Cargando…

Metaplot: A Novel Stata Graph for Assessing Heterogeneity at a Glance

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity is usually a major concern in meta-analysis. Although there are some statistical approaches for assessing variability across studies, here we present a new approach to heterogeneity using “MetaPlot” that investigate the influence of a single study on the overall heterogenei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poorolajal, J, Mahmoodi, M, Majdzadeh, R, Fotouhi, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23113013
_version_ 1782247787402887168
author Poorolajal, J
Mahmoodi, M
Majdzadeh, R
Fotouhi, A
author_facet Poorolajal, J
Mahmoodi, M
Majdzadeh, R
Fotouhi, A
author_sort Poorolajal, J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity is usually a major concern in meta-analysis. Although there are some statistical approaches for assessing variability across studies, here we present a new approach to heterogeneity using “MetaPlot” that investigate the influence of a single study on the overall heterogeneity. METHODS: MetaPlot is a two-way (x, y) graph, which can be considered as a complementary graphical approach for testing heterogeneity. This method shows graphically as well as numerically the results of an influence analysis, in which Higgins’ I(2) statistic with 95% (Confidence interval) CI are computed omitting one study in each turn and then are plotted against reciprocal of standard error (1/SE) or “precision”. In this graph, “1/SE” lies on x axis and “I(2) results” lies on y axe. RESULTS: Having a first glance at MetaPlot, one can predict to what extent omission of a single study may influence the overall heterogeneity. The precision on x-axis enables us to distinguish the size of each trial. The graph describes I(2) statistic with 95% CI graphically as well as numerically in one view for prompt comparison. It is possible to implement MetaPlot for meta-analysis of different types of outcome data and summary measures. CONCLUSION: This method presents a simple graphical approach to identify an outlier and its effect on overall heterogeneity at a glance. We wish to suggest MetaPlot to Stata experts to prepare its module for the software.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3481754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34817542012-10-30 Metaplot: A Novel Stata Graph for Assessing Heterogeneity at a Glance Poorolajal, J Mahmoodi, M Majdzadeh, R Fotouhi, A Iran J Public Health Short Communication BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity is usually a major concern in meta-analysis. Although there are some statistical approaches for assessing variability across studies, here we present a new approach to heterogeneity using “MetaPlot” that investigate the influence of a single study on the overall heterogeneity. METHODS: MetaPlot is a two-way (x, y) graph, which can be considered as a complementary graphical approach for testing heterogeneity. This method shows graphically as well as numerically the results of an influence analysis, in which Higgins’ I(2) statistic with 95% (Confidence interval) CI are computed omitting one study in each turn and then are plotted against reciprocal of standard error (1/SE) or “precision”. In this graph, “1/SE” lies on x axis and “I(2) results” lies on y axe. RESULTS: Having a first glance at MetaPlot, one can predict to what extent omission of a single study may influence the overall heterogeneity. The precision on x-axis enables us to distinguish the size of each trial. The graph describes I(2) statistic with 95% CI graphically as well as numerically in one view for prompt comparison. It is possible to implement MetaPlot for meta-analysis of different types of outcome data and summary measures. CONCLUSION: This method presents a simple graphical approach to identify an outlier and its effect on overall heterogeneity at a glance. We wish to suggest MetaPlot to Stata experts to prepare its module for the software. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2010-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3481754/ /pubmed/23113013 Text en Copyright © Iranian Public Health Association & Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Poorolajal, J
Mahmoodi, M
Majdzadeh, R
Fotouhi, A
Metaplot: A Novel Stata Graph for Assessing Heterogeneity at a Glance
title Metaplot: A Novel Stata Graph for Assessing Heterogeneity at a Glance
title_full Metaplot: A Novel Stata Graph for Assessing Heterogeneity at a Glance
title_fullStr Metaplot: A Novel Stata Graph for Assessing Heterogeneity at a Glance
title_full_unstemmed Metaplot: A Novel Stata Graph for Assessing Heterogeneity at a Glance
title_short Metaplot: A Novel Stata Graph for Assessing Heterogeneity at a Glance
title_sort metaplot: a novel stata graph for assessing heterogeneity at a glance
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23113013
work_keys_str_mv AT poorolajalj metaplotanovelstatagraphforassessingheterogeneityataglance
AT mahmoodim metaplotanovelstatagraphforassessingheterogeneityataglance
AT majdzadehr metaplotanovelstatagraphforassessingheterogeneityataglance
AT fotouhia metaplotanovelstatagraphforassessingheterogeneityataglance