Cargando…
Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the frequency distribution of various arch shapes in ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia and to investigate the morphological differences of arch form between these two ethnic groups. METHODS: We examined 120 ethnic Malay study models (60...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Association of Orthodontists
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112931 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.47 |
_version_ | 1782247819356143616 |
---|---|
author | Othman, Siti Adibah Xinwei, Eunice Soh Lim, Sheh Yinn Jamaludin, Marhazlinda Mohamed, Nor Himazian Yusof, Zamros Yuzaidi Mohd Shoaib, Lily Azura Nik Hussein, Nik Noriah |
author_facet | Othman, Siti Adibah Xinwei, Eunice Soh Lim, Sheh Yinn Jamaludin, Marhazlinda Mohamed, Nor Himazian Yusof, Zamros Yuzaidi Mohd Shoaib, Lily Azura Nik Hussein, Nik Noriah |
author_sort | Othman, Siti Adibah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the frequency distribution of various arch shapes in ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia and to investigate the morphological differences of arch form between these two ethnic groups. METHODS: We examined 120 ethnic Malay study models (60 maxillary, 60 mandibular) and 129 Malaysian Aboriginal study models (66 maxillary, 63 mandibular). We marked 18 buccal tips and incisor line angles on each model, and digitized them using 2-dimensional coordinate system. Dental arches were classified as square, ovoid, or tapered by printing the scanned images and superimposing Orthoform arch templates on them. RESULTS: The most common maxillary arch shape in both ethnic groups was ovoid, as was the most common mandibular arch shape among ethnic Malay females. The rarest arch shape was square. Chi-square tests, indicated that only the distribution of the mandibular arch shape was significantly different between groups (p = 0.040). However, when compared using independent t-tests, there was no difference in the mean value of arch width between groups. Arch shape distribution was not different between genders of either ethnic group, except for the mandibular arch of ethnic Malays. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines have similar dental arch dimensions and shapes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3481960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Korean Association of Orthodontists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34819602012-10-30 Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia Othman, Siti Adibah Xinwei, Eunice Soh Lim, Sheh Yinn Jamaludin, Marhazlinda Mohamed, Nor Himazian Yusof, Zamros Yuzaidi Mohd Shoaib, Lily Azura Nik Hussein, Nik Noriah Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the frequency distribution of various arch shapes in ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia and to investigate the morphological differences of arch form between these two ethnic groups. METHODS: We examined 120 ethnic Malay study models (60 maxillary, 60 mandibular) and 129 Malaysian Aboriginal study models (66 maxillary, 63 mandibular). We marked 18 buccal tips and incisor line angles on each model, and digitized them using 2-dimensional coordinate system. Dental arches were classified as square, ovoid, or tapered by printing the scanned images and superimposing Orthoform arch templates on them. RESULTS: The most common maxillary arch shape in both ethnic groups was ovoid, as was the most common mandibular arch shape among ethnic Malay females. The rarest arch shape was square. Chi-square tests, indicated that only the distribution of the mandibular arch shape was significantly different between groups (p = 0.040). However, when compared using independent t-tests, there was no difference in the mean value of arch width between groups. Arch shape distribution was not different between genders of either ethnic group, except for the mandibular arch of ethnic Malays. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines have similar dental arch dimensions and shapes. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2012-02 2012-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3481960/ /pubmed/23112931 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.47 Text en © 2012 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Othman, Siti Adibah Xinwei, Eunice Soh Lim, Sheh Yinn Jamaludin, Marhazlinda Mohamed, Nor Himazian Yusof, Zamros Yuzaidi Mohd Shoaib, Lily Azura Nik Hussein, Nik Noriah Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia |
title | Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia |
title_full | Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia |
title_short | Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia |
title_sort | comparison of arch form between ethnic malays and malaysian aborigines in peninsular malaysia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3481960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112931 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.47 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT othmansitiadibah comparisonofarchformbetweenethnicmalaysandmalaysianaboriginesinpeninsularmalaysia AT xinweieunicesoh comparisonofarchformbetweenethnicmalaysandmalaysianaboriginesinpeninsularmalaysia AT limshehyinn comparisonofarchformbetweenethnicmalaysandmalaysianaboriginesinpeninsularmalaysia AT jamaludinmarhazlinda comparisonofarchformbetweenethnicmalaysandmalaysianaboriginesinpeninsularmalaysia AT mohamednorhimazian comparisonofarchformbetweenethnicmalaysandmalaysianaboriginesinpeninsularmalaysia AT yusofzamrosyuzaidimohd comparisonofarchformbetweenethnicmalaysandmalaysianaboriginesinpeninsularmalaysia AT shoaiblilyazura comparisonofarchformbetweenethnicmalaysandmalaysianaboriginesinpeninsularmalaysia AT nikhusseinniknoriah comparisonofarchformbetweenethnicmalaysandmalaysianaboriginesinpeninsularmalaysia |