Cargando…

Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature

Syndesmotic rupture is present in 10 % of ankle fractures and must be recognized and treated to prevent late complications. The method of fixation is classically rigid fixation with one or two screws. Knowledge of the biomechanics of the syndesmosis has led to the development of new dynamic implants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: den Daas, Annick, van Zuuren, Wouter J., Pelet, Stéphane, van Noort, Arthur, van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23096259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-012-0147-2
_version_ 1782247863923769344
author den Daas, Annick
van Zuuren, Wouter J.
Pelet, Stéphane
van Noort, Arthur
van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
author_facet den Daas, Annick
van Zuuren, Wouter J.
Pelet, Stéphane
van Noort, Arthur
van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
author_sort den Daas, Annick
collection PubMed
description Syndesmotic rupture is present in 10 % of ankle fractures and must be recognized and treated to prevent late complications. The method of fixation is classically rigid fixation with one or two screws. Knowledge of the biomechanics of the syndesmosis has led to the development of new dynamic implants to restore physiologic motion during walking. One of these implants is the suture-button system. The purpose of this paper is to review the orthopaedic trauma literature, both biomechanical and clinical, to present the current state of knowledge on the suture-button fixation and to put emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of this technique. Two investigators searched the databases of Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane Clinical Trial Register and Embase independently. The search interval was from January 1980 to March 2011. The search keys comprised terms to identify articles on biomechanical and clinical issues of flexible fixation of syndesmotic ruptures. Ninety-nine publications met the search criteria. After filtering using the exclusion criteria, 11 articles (five biomechanical and six clinical) were available for review. The biomechanical studies involved 90 cadaveric ankles. The suture-button demonstrated good resistance to axial and rotational loads (equivalent to screws) and resistance to failure. Physiologic motion of the syndesmosis was restored in all directions. The clinical studies (149 ankles) demonstrated good functional results using the AOFAS score, indicating faster rehabilitation with flexible fixation than with screws. There were few complications. Preliminary results from the current literature support the use of suture-button fixation for syndesmotic ruptures. This method seems secure and safe. As there is no strong evidence for its use, prospective randomized controlled trials to compare the suture-button to the screw fixation for ankle syndesmotic ruptures are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3482438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34824382012-11-09 Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature den Daas, Annick van Zuuren, Wouter J. Pelet, Stéphane van Noort, Arthur van den Bekerom, Michel P. J. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Review Syndesmotic rupture is present in 10 % of ankle fractures and must be recognized and treated to prevent late complications. The method of fixation is classically rigid fixation with one or two screws. Knowledge of the biomechanics of the syndesmosis has led to the development of new dynamic implants to restore physiologic motion during walking. One of these implants is the suture-button system. The purpose of this paper is to review the orthopaedic trauma literature, both biomechanical and clinical, to present the current state of knowledge on the suture-button fixation and to put emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of this technique. Two investigators searched the databases of Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane Clinical Trial Register and Embase independently. The search interval was from January 1980 to March 2011. The search keys comprised terms to identify articles on biomechanical and clinical issues of flexible fixation of syndesmotic ruptures. Ninety-nine publications met the search criteria. After filtering using the exclusion criteria, 11 articles (five biomechanical and six clinical) were available for review. The biomechanical studies involved 90 cadaveric ankles. The suture-button demonstrated good resistance to axial and rotational loads (equivalent to screws) and resistance to failure. Physiologic motion of the syndesmosis was restored in all directions. The clinical studies (149 ankles) demonstrated good functional results using the AOFAS score, indicating faster rehabilitation with flexible fixation than with screws. There were few complications. Preliminary results from the current literature support the use of suture-button fixation for syndesmotic ruptures. This method seems secure and safe. As there is no strong evidence for its use, prospective randomized controlled trials to compare the suture-button to the screw fixation for ankle syndesmotic ruptures are required. Springer Milan 2012-10-25 2012-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3482438/ /pubmed/23096259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-012-0147-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
den Daas, Annick
van Zuuren, Wouter J.
Pelet, Stéphane
van Noort, Arthur
van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature
title Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature
title_full Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature
title_fullStr Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature
title_short Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature
title_sort flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23096259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-012-0147-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dendaasannick flexiblestabilizationofthedistaltibiofibularsyndesmosisclinicalandbiomechanicalconsiderationsareviewoftheliterature
AT vanzuurenwouterj flexiblestabilizationofthedistaltibiofibularsyndesmosisclinicalandbiomechanicalconsiderationsareviewoftheliterature
AT peletstephane flexiblestabilizationofthedistaltibiofibularsyndesmosisclinicalandbiomechanicalconsiderationsareviewoftheliterature
AT vannoortarthur flexiblestabilizationofthedistaltibiofibularsyndesmosisclinicalandbiomechanicalconsiderationsareviewoftheliterature
AT vandenbekerommichelpj flexiblestabilizationofthedistaltibiofibularsyndesmosisclinicalandbiomechanicalconsiderationsareviewoftheliterature