Cargando…

Microhardness of different resin cement shades inside the root canal

Objectives: To compare microhardness along the root canal post space of two resin cements in different shades and a dual-cure resin core material. Study Design: Root canals of 21 bovine incisors were prepared for post space. Translucent posts (X•Post, Dentsply DeTrey) were luted using one the follow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vignolo, Valeria, Fuentes, Maria V., Garrido, Miguel A., Rodríguez, Jesús, Ceballos, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322514
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17802
_version_ 1782247874884534272
author Vignolo, Valeria
Fuentes, Maria V.
Garrido, Miguel A.
Rodríguez, Jesús
Ceballos, Laura
author_facet Vignolo, Valeria
Fuentes, Maria V.
Garrido, Miguel A.
Rodríguez, Jesús
Ceballos, Laura
author_sort Vignolo, Valeria
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To compare microhardness along the root canal post space of two resin cements in different shades and a dual-cure resin core material. Study Design: Root canals of 21 bovine incisors were prepared for post space. Translucent posts (X•Post, Dentsply DeTrey) were luted using one the following resin luting agent: Calibra (Dentsply DeTrey) in Translucent, Medium and Opaque shades, RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE) in Translucent, A2 and A3 shades and the dual-cure resin core material Core•X flow. All materials were applied according to manufacturers’ instructions and were all photopolymerized (Bluephase LED unit, Ivoclar Vivadent, 40s). After 24 hours, roots were transversally cut into 9 slices 1 mm thick from the coronal to apical extremes, three corresponding to each root third. Then, VHNs were recorded (100 gf, 30 s) on the resin luting materials along the adhesive interface in all sections. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and SNK tests (α=0.05). Results: A significant influence on microhardness of resin luting material in their respective shades (p<0.001), root third (p<0.001) and interactions between them was detected (p<0.001). RelyX Unicem cement showed the highest microhardness values and Calibra the lowest, regardless of the shade selected. All resin luting materials tested exhibited a significantly higher microhardness in the cervical third. Conclusions: Microhardness of resin luting agents tested inside the canal is dependent on material brand and resin cement shade seems to be a less relevant factor. Microhardness decreased along the root canal, regardless of the shade selected. Key words:Cement shade, degree of conversion, dual-cured resin cements, fiber posts, microhardness, root thirds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3482534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34825342012-10-31 Microhardness of different resin cement shades inside the root canal Vignolo, Valeria Fuentes, Maria V. Garrido, Miguel A. Rodríguez, Jesús Ceballos, Laura Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research-Article Objectives: To compare microhardness along the root canal post space of two resin cements in different shades and a dual-cure resin core material. Study Design: Root canals of 21 bovine incisors were prepared for post space. Translucent posts (X•Post, Dentsply DeTrey) were luted using one the following resin luting agent: Calibra (Dentsply DeTrey) in Translucent, Medium and Opaque shades, RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE) in Translucent, A2 and A3 shades and the dual-cure resin core material Core•X flow. All materials were applied according to manufacturers’ instructions and were all photopolymerized (Bluephase LED unit, Ivoclar Vivadent, 40s). After 24 hours, roots were transversally cut into 9 slices 1 mm thick from the coronal to apical extremes, three corresponding to each root third. Then, VHNs were recorded (100 gf, 30 s) on the resin luting materials along the adhesive interface in all sections. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and SNK tests (α=0.05). Results: A significant influence on microhardness of resin luting material in their respective shades (p<0.001), root third (p<0.001) and interactions between them was detected (p<0.001). RelyX Unicem cement showed the highest microhardness values and Calibra the lowest, regardless of the shade selected. All resin luting materials tested exhibited a significantly higher microhardness in the cervical third. Conclusions: Microhardness of resin luting agents tested inside the canal is dependent on material brand and resin cement shade seems to be a less relevant factor. Microhardness decreased along the root canal, regardless of the shade selected. Key words:Cement shade, degree of conversion, dual-cured resin cements, fiber posts, microhardness, root thirds. Medicina Oral S.L. 2012-09 2012-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3482534/ /pubmed/22322514 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17802 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research-Article
Vignolo, Valeria
Fuentes, Maria V.
Garrido, Miguel A.
Rodríguez, Jesús
Ceballos, Laura
Microhardness of different resin cement shades inside the root canal
title Microhardness of different resin cement shades inside the root canal
title_full Microhardness of different resin cement shades inside the root canal
title_fullStr Microhardness of different resin cement shades inside the root canal
title_full_unstemmed Microhardness of different resin cement shades inside the root canal
title_short Microhardness of different resin cement shades inside the root canal
title_sort microhardness of different resin cement shades inside the root canal
topic Research-Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322514
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17802
work_keys_str_mv AT vignolovaleria microhardnessofdifferentresincementshadesinsidetherootcanal
AT fuentesmariav microhardnessofdifferentresincementshadesinsidetherootcanal
AT garridomiguela microhardnessofdifferentresincementshadesinsidetherootcanal
AT rodriguezjesus microhardnessofdifferentresincementshadesinsidetherootcanal
AT ceballoslaura microhardnessofdifferentresincementshadesinsidetherootcanal