Cargando…
Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF
AIMS: The aims of the study are to develop a cost-minimization analysis from the hospital perspective and a cost-effectiveness analysis from the third payer standpoint, based on direct estimates of costs and QOL associated with remote follow-ups, using Merlin@home and Merlin.net, compared with stand...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22544910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus093 |
_version_ | 1782247890996953088 |
---|---|
author | Ricci, Renato P. D'Onofrio, Antonio Padeletti, Luigi Sagone, Antonio Vicentini, Alfredo Vincenti, Antonio Morichelli, Loredana Cavallaro, Ciro Ricciardi, Giuseppe Lombardi, Leonida Fusco, Antonio Rovaris, Giovanni Silvestri, Paolo Guidotto, Tiziana Pollastrelli, Annalisa Santini, Massimo |
author_facet | Ricci, Renato P. D'Onofrio, Antonio Padeletti, Luigi Sagone, Antonio Vicentini, Alfredo Vincenti, Antonio Morichelli, Loredana Cavallaro, Ciro Ricciardi, Giuseppe Lombardi, Leonida Fusco, Antonio Rovaris, Giovanni Silvestri, Paolo Guidotto, Tiziana Pollastrelli, Annalisa Santini, Massimo |
author_sort | Ricci, Renato P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The aims of the study are to develop a cost-minimization analysis from the hospital perspective and a cost-effectiveness analysis from the third payer standpoint, based on direct estimates of costs and QOL associated with remote follow-ups, using Merlin@home and Merlin.net, compared with standard ambulatory follow-ups, in the management of ICD and CRT-D recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Remote monitoring systems can replace ambulatory follow-ups, sparing human and economic resources, and increasing patient safety. TARIFF is a prospective, controlled, observational study aimed at measuring the direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QOL) of all participants by a 1-year economic evaluation. A detailed set of hospitalized and ambulatory healthcare costs and losses of productivity that could be directly influenced by the different means of follow-ups will be collected. The study consists of two phases, each including 100 patients, to measure the economic resources consumed during the first phase, associated with standard ambulatory follow-ups, vs. the second phase, associated with remote follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring systems enable caregivers to better ensure patient safety and the healthcare to limit costs. TARIFF will allow defining the economic value of remote ICD follow-ups for Italian hospitals, third payers, and patients. The TARIFF study, based on a cost-minimization analysis, directly comparing remote follow-up with standard ambulatory visits, will validate the cost effectiveness of the Merlin.net technology, and define a proper reimbursement schedule applicable for the Italian healthcare system. Trial registration: NCT01075516. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3482620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34826202012-10-29 Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF Ricci, Renato P. D'Onofrio, Antonio Padeletti, Luigi Sagone, Antonio Vicentini, Alfredo Vincenti, Antonio Morichelli, Loredana Cavallaro, Ciro Ricciardi, Giuseppe Lombardi, Leonida Fusco, Antonio Rovaris, Giovanni Silvestri, Paolo Guidotto, Tiziana Pollastrelli, Annalisa Santini, Massimo Europace Clinical Research AIMS: The aims of the study are to develop a cost-minimization analysis from the hospital perspective and a cost-effectiveness analysis from the third payer standpoint, based on direct estimates of costs and QOL associated with remote follow-ups, using Merlin@home and Merlin.net, compared with standard ambulatory follow-ups, in the management of ICD and CRT-D recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Remote monitoring systems can replace ambulatory follow-ups, sparing human and economic resources, and increasing patient safety. TARIFF is a prospective, controlled, observational study aimed at measuring the direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QOL) of all participants by a 1-year economic evaluation. A detailed set of hospitalized and ambulatory healthcare costs and losses of productivity that could be directly influenced by the different means of follow-ups will be collected. The study consists of two phases, each including 100 patients, to measure the economic resources consumed during the first phase, associated with standard ambulatory follow-ups, vs. the second phase, associated with remote follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring systems enable caregivers to better ensure patient safety and the healthcare to limit costs. TARIFF will allow defining the economic value of remote ICD follow-ups for Italian hospitals, third payers, and patients. The TARIFF study, based on a cost-minimization analysis, directly comparing remote follow-up with standard ambulatory visits, will validate the cost effectiveness of the Merlin.net technology, and define a proper reimbursement schedule applicable for the Italian healthcare system. Trial registration: NCT01075516. Oxford University Press 2012-11 2012-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3482620/ /pubmed/22544910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus093 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2012. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Ricci, Renato P. D'Onofrio, Antonio Padeletti, Luigi Sagone, Antonio Vicentini, Alfredo Vincenti, Antonio Morichelli, Loredana Cavallaro, Ciro Ricciardi, Giuseppe Lombardi, Leonida Fusco, Antonio Rovaris, Giovanni Silvestri, Paolo Guidotto, Tiziana Pollastrelli, Annalisa Santini, Massimo Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF |
title | Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF |
title_full | Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF |
title_fullStr | Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF |
title_short | Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF |
title_sort | rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: tariff |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22544910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riccirenatop rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT donofrioantonio rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT padelettiluigi rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT sagoneantonio rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT vicentinialfredo rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT vincentiantonio rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT morichelliloredana rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT cavallarociro rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT ricciardigiuseppe rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT lombardileonida rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT fuscoantonio rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT rovarisgiovanni rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT silvestripaolo rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT guidottotiziana rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT pollastrelliannalisa rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff AT santinimassimo rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff |