Cargando…

Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF

AIMS: The aims of the study are to develop a cost-minimization analysis from the hospital perspective and a cost-effectiveness analysis from the third payer standpoint, based on direct estimates of costs and QOL associated with remote follow-ups, using Merlin@home and Merlin.net, compared with stand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricci, Renato P., D'Onofrio, Antonio, Padeletti, Luigi, Sagone, Antonio, Vicentini, Alfredo, Vincenti, Antonio, Morichelli, Loredana, Cavallaro, Ciro, Ricciardi, Giuseppe, Lombardi, Leonida, Fusco, Antonio, Rovaris, Giovanni, Silvestri, Paolo, Guidotto, Tiziana, Pollastrelli, Annalisa, Santini, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22544910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus093
_version_ 1782247890996953088
author Ricci, Renato P.
D'Onofrio, Antonio
Padeletti, Luigi
Sagone, Antonio
Vicentini, Alfredo
Vincenti, Antonio
Morichelli, Loredana
Cavallaro, Ciro
Ricciardi, Giuseppe
Lombardi, Leonida
Fusco, Antonio
Rovaris, Giovanni
Silvestri, Paolo
Guidotto, Tiziana
Pollastrelli, Annalisa
Santini, Massimo
author_facet Ricci, Renato P.
D'Onofrio, Antonio
Padeletti, Luigi
Sagone, Antonio
Vicentini, Alfredo
Vincenti, Antonio
Morichelli, Loredana
Cavallaro, Ciro
Ricciardi, Giuseppe
Lombardi, Leonida
Fusco, Antonio
Rovaris, Giovanni
Silvestri, Paolo
Guidotto, Tiziana
Pollastrelli, Annalisa
Santini, Massimo
author_sort Ricci, Renato P.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aims of the study are to develop a cost-minimization analysis from the hospital perspective and a cost-effectiveness analysis from the third payer standpoint, based on direct estimates of costs and QOL associated with remote follow-ups, using Merlin@home and Merlin.net, compared with standard ambulatory follow-ups, in the management of ICD and CRT-D recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Remote monitoring systems can replace ambulatory follow-ups, sparing human and economic resources, and increasing patient safety. TARIFF is a prospective, controlled, observational study aimed at measuring the direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QOL) of all participants by a 1-year economic evaluation. A detailed set of hospitalized and ambulatory healthcare costs and losses of productivity that could be directly influenced by the different means of follow-ups will be collected. The study consists of two phases, each including 100 patients, to measure the economic resources consumed during the first phase, associated with standard ambulatory follow-ups, vs. the second phase, associated with remote follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring systems enable caregivers to better ensure patient safety and the healthcare to limit costs. TARIFF will allow defining the economic value of remote ICD follow-ups for Italian hospitals, third payers, and patients. The TARIFF study, based on a cost-minimization analysis, directly comparing remote follow-up with standard ambulatory visits, will validate the cost effectiveness of the Merlin.net technology, and define a proper reimbursement schedule applicable for the Italian healthcare system. Trial registration: NCT01075516.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3482620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34826202012-10-29 Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF Ricci, Renato P. D'Onofrio, Antonio Padeletti, Luigi Sagone, Antonio Vicentini, Alfredo Vincenti, Antonio Morichelli, Loredana Cavallaro, Ciro Ricciardi, Giuseppe Lombardi, Leonida Fusco, Antonio Rovaris, Giovanni Silvestri, Paolo Guidotto, Tiziana Pollastrelli, Annalisa Santini, Massimo Europace Clinical Research AIMS: The aims of the study are to develop a cost-minimization analysis from the hospital perspective and a cost-effectiveness analysis from the third payer standpoint, based on direct estimates of costs and QOL associated with remote follow-ups, using Merlin@home and Merlin.net, compared with standard ambulatory follow-ups, in the management of ICD and CRT-D recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Remote monitoring systems can replace ambulatory follow-ups, sparing human and economic resources, and increasing patient safety. TARIFF is a prospective, controlled, observational study aimed at measuring the direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QOL) of all participants by a 1-year economic evaluation. A detailed set of hospitalized and ambulatory healthcare costs and losses of productivity that could be directly influenced by the different means of follow-ups will be collected. The study consists of two phases, each including 100 patients, to measure the economic resources consumed during the first phase, associated with standard ambulatory follow-ups, vs. the second phase, associated with remote follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring systems enable caregivers to better ensure patient safety and the healthcare to limit costs. TARIFF will allow defining the economic value of remote ICD follow-ups for Italian hospitals, third payers, and patients. The TARIFF study, based on a cost-minimization analysis, directly comparing remote follow-up with standard ambulatory visits, will validate the cost effectiveness of the Merlin.net technology, and define a proper reimbursement schedule applicable for the Italian healthcare system. Trial registration: NCT01075516. Oxford University Press 2012-11 2012-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3482620/ /pubmed/22544910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus093 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2012. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ricci, Renato P.
D'Onofrio, Antonio
Padeletti, Luigi
Sagone, Antonio
Vicentini, Alfredo
Vincenti, Antonio
Morichelli, Loredana
Cavallaro, Ciro
Ricciardi, Giuseppe
Lombardi, Leonida
Fusco, Antonio
Rovaris, Giovanni
Silvestri, Paolo
Guidotto, Tiziana
Pollastrelli, Annalisa
Santini, Massimo
Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF
title Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF
title_full Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF
title_short Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF
title_sort rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: tariff
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22544910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus093
work_keys_str_mv AT riccirenatop rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT donofrioantonio rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT padelettiluigi rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT sagoneantonio rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT vicentinialfredo rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT vincentiantonio rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT morichelliloredana rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT cavallarociro rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT ricciardigiuseppe rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT lombardileonida rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT fuscoantonio rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT rovarisgiovanni rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT silvestripaolo rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT guidottotiziana rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT pollastrelliannalisa rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff
AT santinimassimo rationaleanddesignofthehealtheconomicsevaluationregistryforremotefollowuptariff