Cargando…

Bacteriological Study of Pyodermas in a Tertiary Care Dermatological Center

BACKGROUND: Bacterial skin infection especially Pyoderma, commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus and group A Streptococci, is quite common in Indian dermatology clinics. Despite a number of new antibiotics, the incidence of bacterial resistance is rising. AIM: To find out causative organisms and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malhotra, Suresh K, Malhotra, Sita, Dhaliwal, Gurjit S, Thakur, Alpna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112354
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.100475
_version_ 1782247913508831232
author Malhotra, Suresh K
Malhotra, Sita
Dhaliwal, Gurjit S
Thakur, Alpna
author_facet Malhotra, Suresh K
Malhotra, Sita
Dhaliwal, Gurjit S
Thakur, Alpna
author_sort Malhotra, Suresh K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacterial skin infection especially Pyoderma, commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus and group A Streptococci, is quite common in Indian dermatology clinics. Despite a number of new antibiotics, the incidence of bacterial resistance is rising. AIM: To find out causative organisms and their latest antibiotic susceptibility patterns in pyodermas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All in-patients admitted in the Dermatology wards in Government Medical College, Amritsar were screened over 18 months and those with erosive skin lesions and/or purulent discharge were included in the study and swabs were sent for culture and sensitivity. RESULTS: Majority 49/61 cases (80.33%) comprised of secondary pyodermas while primary pyodermas constituted only 12/61 cases (19.67%). Single organism was isolated in 49 cases (80.33%). More than one type of organism was isolated in 3 cases (4.92%) while none could be isolated from 9 (14.75%) cases. Staphylococcus aureus spp. was the commonest organism isolated in 36 (59.01%) cases and out of these, coagulase positive strains were found to be highly susceptible to amikacin (21cases-100%). Coagulase negative strains were sensitive to amikacin (7 cases-77.7%) and gentamycin (6 cases-66.6%) respectively. CONCLUSION: This study gives an indication of the present pattern of bacteriological profile of pyodermas in a tertiary care hospital in north-west India. In-vitro testing is essential as knowledge of the causative organisms and resistance patterns can help us select appropriate antibiotics without wasting time in using resistant drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3482797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34827972012-10-30 Bacteriological Study of Pyodermas in a Tertiary Care Dermatological Center Malhotra, Suresh K Malhotra, Sita Dhaliwal, Gurjit S Thakur, Alpna Indian J Dermatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Bacterial skin infection especially Pyoderma, commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus and group A Streptococci, is quite common in Indian dermatology clinics. Despite a number of new antibiotics, the incidence of bacterial resistance is rising. AIM: To find out causative organisms and their latest antibiotic susceptibility patterns in pyodermas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All in-patients admitted in the Dermatology wards in Government Medical College, Amritsar were screened over 18 months and those with erosive skin lesions and/or purulent discharge were included in the study and swabs were sent for culture and sensitivity. RESULTS: Majority 49/61 cases (80.33%) comprised of secondary pyodermas while primary pyodermas constituted only 12/61 cases (19.67%). Single organism was isolated in 49 cases (80.33%). More than one type of organism was isolated in 3 cases (4.92%) while none could be isolated from 9 (14.75%) cases. Staphylococcus aureus spp. was the commonest organism isolated in 36 (59.01%) cases and out of these, coagulase positive strains were found to be highly susceptible to amikacin (21cases-100%). Coagulase negative strains were sensitive to amikacin (7 cases-77.7%) and gentamycin (6 cases-66.6%) respectively. CONCLUSION: This study gives an indication of the present pattern of bacteriological profile of pyodermas in a tertiary care hospital in north-west India. In-vitro testing is essential as knowledge of the causative organisms and resistance patterns can help us select appropriate antibiotics without wasting time in using resistant drugs. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3482797/ /pubmed/23112354 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.100475 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Malhotra, Suresh K
Malhotra, Sita
Dhaliwal, Gurjit S
Thakur, Alpna
Bacteriological Study of Pyodermas in a Tertiary Care Dermatological Center
title Bacteriological Study of Pyodermas in a Tertiary Care Dermatological Center
title_full Bacteriological Study of Pyodermas in a Tertiary Care Dermatological Center
title_fullStr Bacteriological Study of Pyodermas in a Tertiary Care Dermatological Center
title_full_unstemmed Bacteriological Study of Pyodermas in a Tertiary Care Dermatological Center
title_short Bacteriological Study of Pyodermas in a Tertiary Care Dermatological Center
title_sort bacteriological study of pyodermas in a tertiary care dermatological center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112354
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.100475
work_keys_str_mv AT malhotrasureshk bacteriologicalstudyofpyodermasinatertiarycaredermatologicalcenter
AT malhotrasita bacteriologicalstudyofpyodermasinatertiarycaredermatologicalcenter
AT dhaliwalgurjits bacteriologicalstudyofpyodermasinatertiarycaredermatologicalcenter
AT thakuralpna bacteriologicalstudyofpyodermasinatertiarycaredermatologicalcenter