Cargando…
Brain response to food stimulation in obese, normal weight, and successful weight loss maintainers
As many people struggle with maintenance of weight loss, the study of successful weight loss maintainers (SWLM) can yield important insights into factors contributing to weight loss maintenance. However, little research has examined how SWLM differ from people who are obese or normal weight (NW) in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22569002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2012.125 |
_version_ | 1782247999356796928 |
---|---|
author | Sweet, Lawrence H. Hassenstab, Jason J. McCaffery, Jeanne M. Raynor, Hollie A. Bond, Dale S. Demos, Kathryn E. Haley, Andreana P. Cohen, Ronald A. Del Parigi, Angelo Wing, Rena R. |
author_facet | Sweet, Lawrence H. Hassenstab, Jason J. McCaffery, Jeanne M. Raynor, Hollie A. Bond, Dale S. Demos, Kathryn E. Haley, Andreana P. Cohen, Ronald A. Del Parigi, Angelo Wing, Rena R. |
author_sort | Sweet, Lawrence H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | As many people struggle with maintenance of weight loss, the study of successful weight loss maintainers (SWLM) can yield important insights into factors contributing to weight loss maintenance. However, little research has examined how SWLM differ from people who are obese or normal weight (NW) in brain response to orosensory stimulation. The goal of this study was to determine if SWLM exhibit different brain responses to orosensory stimulation. Brain response to one-minute orosensory stimulation with a lemon lollipop was assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) among 49 participants, including SWLM (n=17), NW (n=18) and obese (n=14) controls. Significant brain responses were observed in nine brain regions, including the bilateral insula, left inferior frontal gyrus, left putamen, and other sensory regions. All regions also exhibited significant attenuation of this response over one minute. The SWLM exhibited greater response compared to the other groups in all brain regions. Findings suggest that the response to orosensory stimulation peaks within 40 seconds and attenuates significantly between 40-60 seconds in regions associated with sensation, reward, and inhibitory control. Greater reactivity among the SWLM suggests that greater sensory reactivity to orosensory stimulation, increased anticipated reward, and subsequently greater inhibitory processing are associated with weight loss maintenance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3483466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34834662013-05-01 Brain response to food stimulation in obese, normal weight, and successful weight loss maintainers Sweet, Lawrence H. Hassenstab, Jason J. McCaffery, Jeanne M. Raynor, Hollie A. Bond, Dale S. Demos, Kathryn E. Haley, Andreana P. Cohen, Ronald A. Del Parigi, Angelo Wing, Rena R. Obesity (Silver Spring) Article As many people struggle with maintenance of weight loss, the study of successful weight loss maintainers (SWLM) can yield important insights into factors contributing to weight loss maintenance. However, little research has examined how SWLM differ from people who are obese or normal weight (NW) in brain response to orosensory stimulation. The goal of this study was to determine if SWLM exhibit different brain responses to orosensory stimulation. Brain response to one-minute orosensory stimulation with a lemon lollipop was assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) among 49 participants, including SWLM (n=17), NW (n=18) and obese (n=14) controls. Significant brain responses were observed in nine brain regions, including the bilateral insula, left inferior frontal gyrus, left putamen, and other sensory regions. All regions also exhibited significant attenuation of this response over one minute. The SWLM exhibited greater response compared to the other groups in all brain regions. Findings suggest that the response to orosensory stimulation peaks within 40 seconds and attenuates significantly between 40-60 seconds in regions associated with sensation, reward, and inhibitory control. Greater reactivity among the SWLM suggests that greater sensory reactivity to orosensory stimulation, increased anticipated reward, and subsequently greater inhibitory processing are associated with weight loss maintenance. 2012-05-09 2012-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3483466/ /pubmed/22569002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2012.125 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Sweet, Lawrence H. Hassenstab, Jason J. McCaffery, Jeanne M. Raynor, Hollie A. Bond, Dale S. Demos, Kathryn E. Haley, Andreana P. Cohen, Ronald A. Del Parigi, Angelo Wing, Rena R. Brain response to food stimulation in obese, normal weight, and successful weight loss maintainers |
title | Brain response to food stimulation in obese, normal weight, and successful weight loss maintainers |
title_full | Brain response to food stimulation in obese, normal weight, and successful weight loss maintainers |
title_fullStr | Brain response to food stimulation in obese, normal weight, and successful weight loss maintainers |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain response to food stimulation in obese, normal weight, and successful weight loss maintainers |
title_short | Brain response to food stimulation in obese, normal weight, and successful weight loss maintainers |
title_sort | brain response to food stimulation in obese, normal weight, and successful weight loss maintainers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22569002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2012.125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sweetlawrenceh brainresponsetofoodstimulationinobesenormalweightandsuccessfulweightlossmaintainers AT hassenstabjasonj brainresponsetofoodstimulationinobesenormalweightandsuccessfulweightlossmaintainers AT mccafferyjeannem brainresponsetofoodstimulationinobesenormalweightandsuccessfulweightlossmaintainers AT raynorholliea brainresponsetofoodstimulationinobesenormalweightandsuccessfulweightlossmaintainers AT bonddales brainresponsetofoodstimulationinobesenormalweightandsuccessfulweightlossmaintainers AT demoskathryne brainresponsetofoodstimulationinobesenormalweightandsuccessfulweightlossmaintainers AT haleyandreanap brainresponsetofoodstimulationinobesenormalweightandsuccessfulweightlossmaintainers AT cohenronalda brainresponsetofoodstimulationinobesenormalweightandsuccessfulweightlossmaintainers AT delparigiangelo brainresponsetofoodstimulationinobesenormalweightandsuccessfulweightlossmaintainers AT wingrenar brainresponsetofoodstimulationinobesenormalweightandsuccessfulweightlossmaintainers |