Cargando…

Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma

Objectives: Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is useful for restaging renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and detecting metastatic diseases but is less satisfactory for detecting primary disease. We evaluated whether the integration of computed tomography (CT) scans with the P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hsin-Yi, Ding, Hueisch-Jy, Chen, Jin-Hua, Chao, Chih-Hao, Lu, Yu-Yu, Lin, Wan-Yu, Kao, Chia-Hung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: e-Med 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23108238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0042
_version_ 1782248025910935552
author Wang, Hsin-Yi
Ding, Hueisch-Jy
Chen, Jin-Hua
Chao, Chih-Hao
Lu, Yu-Yu
Lin, Wan-Yu
Kao, Chia-Hung
author_facet Wang, Hsin-Yi
Ding, Hueisch-Jy
Chen, Jin-Hua
Chao, Chih-Hao
Lu, Yu-Yu
Lin, Wan-Yu
Kao, Chia-Hung
author_sort Wang, Hsin-Yi
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is useful for restaging renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and detecting metastatic diseases but is less satisfactory for detecting primary disease. We evaluated whether the integration of computed tomography (CT) scans with the PET system could increase the applicability of FDG-PET for RCC. Methods: The MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant studies published since 2001. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study identified. We then performed a meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET findings as reported in all the selected studies. Results: Fourteen studies were eligible for inclusion. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET were 62% and 88% respectively, for renal lesions. For detecting extra-renal lesions, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET were 79% and 90%, respectively, based on the scans, and 84% and 91% based on the lesions. The use of a hybrid FDG-PET/CT to detect extra-renal lesions increased the pooled sensitivity and specificity to 91% and 88%, respectively, with good consistency. Conclusions: For RCC, combining the FDG-PET and CT systems is helpful for detecting extra-renal metastasis rather than renal lesions. The hybrid PET/CT system has comparable sensitivity and specificity with PET in detecting extra-renal lesions of RCC. Advances in knowledge: The FDG-PET and PET/CT systems are both useful for detecting extra-renal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3483599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher e-Med
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34835992014-06-13 Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma Wang, Hsin-Yi Ding, Hueisch-Jy Chen, Jin-Hua Chao, Chih-Hao Lu, Yu-Yu Lin, Wan-Yu Kao, Chia-Hung Cancer Imaging Review Objectives: Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is useful for restaging renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and detecting metastatic diseases but is less satisfactory for detecting primary disease. We evaluated whether the integration of computed tomography (CT) scans with the PET system could increase the applicability of FDG-PET for RCC. Methods: The MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant studies published since 2001. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study identified. We then performed a meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET findings as reported in all the selected studies. Results: Fourteen studies were eligible for inclusion. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET were 62% and 88% respectively, for renal lesions. For detecting extra-renal lesions, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET were 79% and 90%, respectively, based on the scans, and 84% and 91% based on the lesions. The use of a hybrid FDG-PET/CT to detect extra-renal lesions increased the pooled sensitivity and specificity to 91% and 88%, respectively, with good consistency. Conclusions: For RCC, combining the FDG-PET and CT systems is helpful for detecting extra-renal metastasis rather than renal lesions. The hybrid PET/CT system has comparable sensitivity and specificity with PET in detecting extra-renal lesions of RCC. Advances in knowledge: The FDG-PET and PET/CT systems are both useful for detecting extra-renal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma. e-Med 2012-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3483599/ /pubmed/23108238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0042 Text en © 2012 International Cancer Imaging Society
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Hsin-Yi
Ding, Hueisch-Jy
Chen, Jin-Hua
Chao, Chih-Hao
Lu, Yu-Yu
Lin, Wan-Yu
Kao, Chia-Hung
Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma
title Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma
title_full Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma
title_short Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma
title_sort meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [(18)f]fdg-pet and pet/ct in renal cell carcinoma
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23108238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0042
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghsinyi metaanalysisofthediagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetandpetctinrenalcellcarcinoma
AT dinghueischjy metaanalysisofthediagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetandpetctinrenalcellcarcinoma
AT chenjinhua metaanalysisofthediagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetandpetctinrenalcellcarcinoma
AT chaochihhao metaanalysisofthediagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetandpetctinrenalcellcarcinoma
AT luyuyu metaanalysisofthediagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetandpetctinrenalcellcarcinoma
AT linwanyu metaanalysisofthediagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetandpetctinrenalcellcarcinoma
AT kaochiahung metaanalysisofthediagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetandpetctinrenalcellcarcinoma