Cargando…
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing li...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513 |
_version_ | 1782248069762383872 |
---|---|
author | Marynewich, Susan Jenstad, Lorienne M. Stapells, David R. |
author_facet | Marynewich, Susan Jenstad, Lorienne M. Stapells, David R. |
author_sort | Marynewich, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing listeners in response to a 60 ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50, and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, and DigitalB) with two gain settings (20 and 40 dB). Results showed that SCP amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid, and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to the unaided across conditions. SCP latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from latencies in the unaided conditions; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed SCP latencies. The results of the current study (as well as several previous studies) indicate that the SCP may not accurately reflect the amplified stimulus expected from the prescribed hearing aids. Thus, “aided-SCP” results must be interpreted with caution, and more research is required concerning possible clinical use of this technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3483828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34838282012-11-01 Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures Marynewich, Susan Jenstad, Lorienne M. Stapells, David R. Int J Otolaryngol Research Article Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing listeners in response to a 60 ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50, and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, and DigitalB) with two gain settings (20 and 40 dB). Results showed that SCP amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid, and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to the unaided across conditions. SCP latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from latencies in the unaided conditions; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed SCP latencies. The results of the current study (as well as several previous studies) indicate that the SCP may not accurately reflect the amplified stimulus expected from the prescribed hearing aids. Thus, “aided-SCP” results must be interpreted with caution, and more research is required concerning possible clinical use of this technique. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3483828/ /pubmed/23118756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513 Text en Copyright © 2012 Susan Marynewich et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Marynewich, Susan Jenstad, Lorienne M. Stapells, David R. Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title | Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title_full | Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title_fullStr | Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title_short | Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title_sort | slow cortical potentials and amplification—part i: n1-p2 measures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marynewichsusan slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures AT jenstadloriennem slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures AT stapellsdavidr slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures |