Cargando…

Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures

Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marynewich, Susan, Jenstad, Lorienne M., Stapells, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513
_version_ 1782248069762383872
author Marynewich, Susan
Jenstad, Lorienne M.
Stapells, David R.
author_facet Marynewich, Susan
Jenstad, Lorienne M.
Stapells, David R.
author_sort Marynewich, Susan
collection PubMed
description Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing listeners in response to a 60 ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50, and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, and DigitalB) with two gain settings (20 and 40 dB). Results showed that SCP amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid, and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to the unaided across conditions. SCP latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from latencies in the unaided conditions; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed SCP latencies. The results of the current study (as well as several previous studies) indicate that the SCP may not accurately reflect the amplified stimulus expected from the prescribed hearing aids. Thus, “aided-SCP” results must be interpreted with caution, and more research is required concerning possible clinical use of this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3483828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34838282012-11-01 Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures Marynewich, Susan Jenstad, Lorienne M. Stapells, David R. Int J Otolaryngol Research Article Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing listeners in response to a 60 ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50, and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, and DigitalB) with two gain settings (20 and 40 dB). Results showed that SCP amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid, and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to the unaided across conditions. SCP latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from latencies in the unaided conditions; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed SCP latencies. The results of the current study (as well as several previous studies) indicate that the SCP may not accurately reflect the amplified stimulus expected from the prescribed hearing aids. Thus, “aided-SCP” results must be interpreted with caution, and more research is required concerning possible clinical use of this technique. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3483828/ /pubmed/23118756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513 Text en Copyright © 2012 Susan Marynewich et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marynewich, Susan
Jenstad, Lorienne M.
Stapells, David R.
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title_full Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title_fullStr Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title_full_unstemmed Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title_short Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title_sort slow cortical potentials and amplification—part i: n1-p2 measures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513
work_keys_str_mv AT marynewichsusan slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures
AT jenstadloriennem slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures
AT stapellsdavidr slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures