Cargando…

Clinical results of external beam radiotherapy alone with a concomitant boost program or with conventional fractionation for cervical cancer patients who did not receive intracavitary brachytherapy

A combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is well established as the standard radical radiotherapy (RT) for cervical cancer. However, it is sometimes necessary to perform EBRT alone for patients where ICBT is not feasible. For these patients, we initia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuura, Kanji, Okabe, Tomoyuki, Fujita, Kazushi, Tanimoto, Hirotoshi, Akagi, Yukio, Kagemoto, Masayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrs051
_version_ 1782248075338711040
author Matsuura, Kanji
Okabe, Tomoyuki
Fujita, Kazushi
Tanimoto, Hirotoshi
Akagi, Yukio
Kagemoto, Masayuki
author_facet Matsuura, Kanji
Okabe, Tomoyuki
Fujita, Kazushi
Tanimoto, Hirotoshi
Akagi, Yukio
Kagemoto, Masayuki
author_sort Matsuura, Kanji
collection PubMed
description A combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is well established as the standard radical radiotherapy (RT) for cervical cancer. However, it is sometimes necessary to perform EBRT alone for patients where ICBT is not feasible. For these patients, we initiated EBRT alone with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of EBRT alone without ICBT for patients with cervical cancer. Sixteen patients were treated with EBRT alone between 2002 and 2009. There were three stage IIB, six stage IIIB and seven patients with stage IVA disease. A total of 10 patients were treated with a median dose of 66 Gy with a median overall treatment time (OTT) of 40 days delivered by a concomitant boost (CCB), and a median dose of 60 Gy with a median OTT of 47 days was administered for six patients by conventional fractionation (CF). The 3-year overall survival (OAS) and local control (LC) rates were 43.8% and 75.0%, respectively. The 3-year LC rate was 90.0% for the CCB group, 50.0% for the CF group (P = 0.0692); 100% for OTT ≤42 days, 42.9% for OTT ≥43 days (P = 0.0095). No severe acute and late adverse effects were encountered for any of the patients. These outcomes suggest that EBRT with a CCB program may be a promising radical treatment for cervical cancer that provides better LC with minimal complications, especially in cases where ICBT cannot be performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3483852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34838522012-10-30 Clinical results of external beam radiotherapy alone with a concomitant boost program or with conventional fractionation for cervical cancer patients who did not receive intracavitary brachytherapy Matsuura, Kanji Okabe, Tomoyuki Fujita, Kazushi Tanimoto, Hirotoshi Akagi, Yukio Kagemoto, Masayuki J Radiat Res Oncology A combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is well established as the standard radical radiotherapy (RT) for cervical cancer. However, it is sometimes necessary to perform EBRT alone for patients where ICBT is not feasible. For these patients, we initiated EBRT alone with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of EBRT alone without ICBT for patients with cervical cancer. Sixteen patients were treated with EBRT alone between 2002 and 2009. There were three stage IIB, six stage IIIB and seven patients with stage IVA disease. A total of 10 patients were treated with a median dose of 66 Gy with a median overall treatment time (OTT) of 40 days delivered by a concomitant boost (CCB), and a median dose of 60 Gy with a median OTT of 47 days was administered for six patients by conventional fractionation (CF). The 3-year overall survival (OAS) and local control (LC) rates were 43.8% and 75.0%, respectively. The 3-year LC rate was 90.0% for the CCB group, 50.0% for the CF group (P = 0.0692); 100% for OTT ≤42 days, 42.9% for OTT ≥43 days (P = 0.0095). No severe acute and late adverse effects were encountered for any of the patients. These outcomes suggest that EBRT with a CCB program may be a promising radical treatment for cervical cancer that provides better LC with minimal complications, especially in cases where ICBT cannot be performed. Oxford University Press 2012-11 2012-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3483852/ /pubmed/22859563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrs051 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Matsuura, Kanji
Okabe, Tomoyuki
Fujita, Kazushi
Tanimoto, Hirotoshi
Akagi, Yukio
Kagemoto, Masayuki
Clinical results of external beam radiotherapy alone with a concomitant boost program or with conventional fractionation for cervical cancer patients who did not receive intracavitary brachytherapy
title Clinical results of external beam radiotherapy alone with a concomitant boost program or with conventional fractionation for cervical cancer patients who did not receive intracavitary brachytherapy
title_full Clinical results of external beam radiotherapy alone with a concomitant boost program or with conventional fractionation for cervical cancer patients who did not receive intracavitary brachytherapy
title_fullStr Clinical results of external beam radiotherapy alone with a concomitant boost program or with conventional fractionation for cervical cancer patients who did not receive intracavitary brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical results of external beam radiotherapy alone with a concomitant boost program or with conventional fractionation for cervical cancer patients who did not receive intracavitary brachytherapy
title_short Clinical results of external beam radiotherapy alone with a concomitant boost program or with conventional fractionation for cervical cancer patients who did not receive intracavitary brachytherapy
title_sort clinical results of external beam radiotherapy alone with a concomitant boost program or with conventional fractionation for cervical cancer patients who did not receive intracavitary brachytherapy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrs051
work_keys_str_mv AT matsuurakanji clinicalresultsofexternalbeamradiotherapyalonewithaconcomitantboostprogramorwithconventionalfractionationforcervicalcancerpatientswhodidnotreceiveintracavitarybrachytherapy
AT okabetomoyuki clinicalresultsofexternalbeamradiotherapyalonewithaconcomitantboostprogramorwithconventionalfractionationforcervicalcancerpatientswhodidnotreceiveintracavitarybrachytherapy
AT fujitakazushi clinicalresultsofexternalbeamradiotherapyalonewithaconcomitantboostprogramorwithconventionalfractionationforcervicalcancerpatientswhodidnotreceiveintracavitarybrachytherapy
AT tanimotohirotoshi clinicalresultsofexternalbeamradiotherapyalonewithaconcomitantboostprogramorwithconventionalfractionationforcervicalcancerpatientswhodidnotreceiveintracavitarybrachytherapy
AT akagiyukio clinicalresultsofexternalbeamradiotherapyalonewithaconcomitantboostprogramorwithconventionalfractionationforcervicalcancerpatientswhodidnotreceiveintracavitarybrachytherapy
AT kagemotomasayuki clinicalresultsofexternalbeamradiotherapyalonewithaconcomitantboostprogramorwithconventionalfractionationforcervicalcancerpatientswhodidnotreceiveintracavitarybrachytherapy