Cargando…

Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment

Bats face a great risk of dehydration, so sensory mechanisms for water recognition are crucial for their survival. In the laboratory, bats recognized any smooth horizontal surface as water because these provide analogous reflections of echolocation calls. We tested whether bats also approach smooth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russo, Danilo, Cistrone, Luca, Jones, Gareth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23133558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048144
_version_ 1782248079779430400
author Russo, Danilo
Cistrone, Luca
Jones, Gareth
author_facet Russo, Danilo
Cistrone, Luca
Jones, Gareth
author_sort Russo, Danilo
collection PubMed
description Bats face a great risk of dehydration, so sensory mechanisms for water recognition are crucial for their survival. In the laboratory, bats recognized any smooth horizontal surface as water because these provide analogous reflections of echolocation calls. We tested whether bats also approach smooth horizontal surfaces other than water to drink in nature by partly covering watering troughs used by hundreds of bats with a Perspex layer mimicking water. We aimed 1) to confirm that under natural conditions too bats mistake any horizontal smooth surface for water by testing this on large numbers of individuals from a range of species and 2) to assess the occurrence of learning effects. Eleven bat species mistook Perspex for water relying chiefly on echoacoustic information. Using black instead of transparent Perspex did not deter bats from attempting to drink. In Barbastella barbastellus no echolocation differences occurred between bats approaching the water and the Perspex surfaces respectively, confirming that bats perceive water and Perspex to be acoustically similar. The drinking attempt rates at the fake surface were often lower than those recorded in the laboratory: bats then either left the site or moved to the control water surface. This suggests that bats modified their behaviour as soon as the lack of drinking reward had overridden the influence of echoacoustic information. Regardless of which of two adjoining surfaces was covered, bats preferentially approached and attempted to drink from the first surface encountered, probably because they followed a common route, involving spatial memory and perhaps social coordination. Overall, although acoustic recognition itself is stereotyped and its importance in the drinking process overwhelming, our findings point at the role of experience in increasing behavioural flexibility under natural conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3483877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34838772012-11-06 Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment Russo, Danilo Cistrone, Luca Jones, Gareth PLoS One Research Article Bats face a great risk of dehydration, so sensory mechanisms for water recognition are crucial for their survival. In the laboratory, bats recognized any smooth horizontal surface as water because these provide analogous reflections of echolocation calls. We tested whether bats also approach smooth horizontal surfaces other than water to drink in nature by partly covering watering troughs used by hundreds of bats with a Perspex layer mimicking water. We aimed 1) to confirm that under natural conditions too bats mistake any horizontal smooth surface for water by testing this on large numbers of individuals from a range of species and 2) to assess the occurrence of learning effects. Eleven bat species mistook Perspex for water relying chiefly on echoacoustic information. Using black instead of transparent Perspex did not deter bats from attempting to drink. In Barbastella barbastellus no echolocation differences occurred between bats approaching the water and the Perspex surfaces respectively, confirming that bats perceive water and Perspex to be acoustically similar. The drinking attempt rates at the fake surface were often lower than those recorded in the laboratory: bats then either left the site or moved to the control water surface. This suggests that bats modified their behaviour as soon as the lack of drinking reward had overridden the influence of echoacoustic information. Regardless of which of two adjoining surfaces was covered, bats preferentially approached and attempted to drink from the first surface encountered, probably because they followed a common route, involving spatial memory and perhaps social coordination. Overall, although acoustic recognition itself is stereotyped and its importance in the drinking process overwhelming, our findings point at the role of experience in increasing behavioural flexibility under natural conditions. Public Library of Science 2012-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3483877/ /pubmed/23133558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048144 Text en © 2012 Russo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Russo, Danilo
Cistrone, Luca
Jones, Gareth
Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title_full Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title_fullStr Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title_short Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title_sort sensory ecology of water detection by bats: a field experiment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23133558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048144
work_keys_str_mv AT russodanilo sensoryecologyofwaterdetectionbybatsafieldexperiment
AT cistroneluca sensoryecologyofwaterdetectionbybatsafieldexperiment
AT jonesgareth sensoryecologyofwaterdetectionbybatsafieldexperiment