Cargando…

Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saccucci, Matteo, Polimeni, Antonella, Festa, Felice, Tecco, Simona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15
_version_ 1782248080949641216
author Saccucci, Matteo
Polimeni, Antonella
Festa, Felice
Tecco, Simona
author_facet Saccucci, Matteo
Polimeni, Antonella
Festa, Felice
Tecco, Simona
author_sort Saccucci, Matteo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained. Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume. The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups. Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3484012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34840122012-10-31 Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis Saccucci, Matteo Polimeni, Antonella Festa, Felice Tecco, Simona Head Face Med Research OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained. Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume. The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups. Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface. BioMed Central 2012-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3484012/ /pubmed/22587445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 Text en Copyright ©2012 Saccucci et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Saccucci, Matteo
Polimeni, Antonella
Festa, Felice
Tecco, Simona
Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
title Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
title_full Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
title_fullStr Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
title_full_unstemmed Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
title_short Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
title_sort do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? a 3d analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15
work_keys_str_mv AT saccuccimatteo doskeletalcephalometriccharacteristicscorrelatewithcondylarvolumesurfaceandshapea3danalysis
AT polimeniantonella doskeletalcephalometriccharacteristicscorrelatewithcondylarvolumesurfaceandshapea3danalysis
AT festafelice doskeletalcephalometriccharacteristicscorrelatewithcondylarvolumesurfaceandshapea3danalysis
AT teccosimona doskeletalcephalometriccharacteristicscorrelatewithcondylarvolumesurfaceandshapea3danalysis