Cargando…

The role of the maximum involvement of biopsy core in predicting outcome for patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the maximum involvement of biopsy core (MIBC) on outcome for prostate cancer patients treated with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The outcomes of 590 men with localized prostate cancer treated with EBRT (≥75 Gy) at a sin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murgic, Jure, Stenmark, Matthew H, Halverson, Schuyler, Blas, Kevin, Feng, Felix Y, Hamstra, Daniel A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22852797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-127
_version_ 1782248086335127552
author Murgic, Jure
Stenmark, Matthew H
Halverson, Schuyler
Blas, Kevin
Feng, Felix Y
Hamstra, Daniel A
author_facet Murgic, Jure
Stenmark, Matthew H
Halverson, Schuyler
Blas, Kevin
Feng, Felix Y
Hamstra, Daniel A
author_sort Murgic, Jure
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the maximum involvement of biopsy core (MIBC) on outcome for prostate cancer patients treated with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The outcomes of 590 men with localized prostate cancer treated with EBRT (≥75 Gy) at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. The influence of MIBC on freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), freedom from metastasis (FFM), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was compared to other surrogates for biopsy tumor volume, including the percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPC) and the total percentage of cancer volume (PCV). RESULTS: MIBC correlated with PSA, T-stage, Gleason score, NCCN risk group, PPC, PCV, and treatment related factors. On univariate analysis, MIBC was prognostic for all endpoints except OS; with greatest impact in those with Gleason scores of 8–10. However, on multivariate analysis, MIBC was only prognostic for FFBF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, p = 0.008), but not for FFM (p = 0.19), CSS (p = 0.16), and OS (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing dose-escalated EBRT, MIBC had the greatest influence in those with Gleason scores of 8–10 but provided no additional prognostic data as compared to PPC and PCV, which remain the preferable prognostic variables in this patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3484035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34840352012-10-31 The role of the maximum involvement of biopsy core in predicting outcome for patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer Murgic, Jure Stenmark, Matthew H Halverson, Schuyler Blas, Kevin Feng, Felix Y Hamstra, Daniel A Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the maximum involvement of biopsy core (MIBC) on outcome for prostate cancer patients treated with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The outcomes of 590 men with localized prostate cancer treated with EBRT (≥75 Gy) at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. The influence of MIBC on freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), freedom from metastasis (FFM), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was compared to other surrogates for biopsy tumor volume, including the percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPC) and the total percentage of cancer volume (PCV). RESULTS: MIBC correlated with PSA, T-stage, Gleason score, NCCN risk group, PPC, PCV, and treatment related factors. On univariate analysis, MIBC was prognostic for all endpoints except OS; with greatest impact in those with Gleason scores of 8–10. However, on multivariate analysis, MIBC was only prognostic for FFBF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, p = 0.008), but not for FFM (p = 0.19), CSS (p = 0.16), and OS (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing dose-escalated EBRT, MIBC had the greatest influence in those with Gleason scores of 8–10 but provided no additional prognostic data as compared to PPC and PCV, which remain the preferable prognostic variables in this patient population. BioMed Central 2012-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3484035/ /pubmed/22852797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-127 Text en Copyright ©2012 Murgic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Murgic, Jure
Stenmark, Matthew H
Halverson, Schuyler
Blas, Kevin
Feng, Felix Y
Hamstra, Daniel A
The role of the maximum involvement of biopsy core in predicting outcome for patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title The role of the maximum involvement of biopsy core in predicting outcome for patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_full The role of the maximum involvement of biopsy core in predicting outcome for patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_fullStr The role of the maximum involvement of biopsy core in predicting outcome for patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed The role of the maximum involvement of biopsy core in predicting outcome for patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_short The role of the maximum involvement of biopsy core in predicting outcome for patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_sort role of the maximum involvement of biopsy core in predicting outcome for patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22852797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-127
work_keys_str_mv AT murgicjure theroleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT stenmarkmatthewh theroleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT halversonschuyler theroleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT blaskevin theroleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT fengfelixy theroleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT hamstradaniela theroleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT murgicjure roleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT stenmarkmatthewh roleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT halversonschuyler roleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT blaskevin roleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT fengfelixy roleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT hamstradaniela roleofthemaximuminvolvementofbiopsycoreinpredictingoutcomeforpatientstreatedwithdoseescalatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer