Cargando…

Donor Funding for Newborn Survival: An Analysis of Donor-Reported Data, 2002–2010

BACKGROUND: Neonatal mortality accounts for 43% of global under-five deaths and is decreasing more slowly than maternal or child mortality. Donor funding has increased for maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH), but no analysis to date has disaggregated aid for newborns. We evaluated if and how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitt, Catherine, Lawn, Joy E., Ranganathan, Meghna, Mills, Anne, Hanson, Kara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001332
_version_ 1782248106262265856
author Pitt, Catherine
Lawn, Joy E.
Ranganathan, Meghna
Mills, Anne
Hanson, Kara
author_facet Pitt, Catherine
Lawn, Joy E.
Ranganathan, Meghna
Mills, Anne
Hanson, Kara
author_sort Pitt, Catherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neonatal mortality accounts for 43% of global under-five deaths and is decreasing more slowly than maternal or child mortality. Donor funding has increased for maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH), but no analysis to date has disaggregated aid for newborns. We evaluated if and how aid flows for newborn care can be tracked, examined changes in the last decade, and considered methodological implications for tracking funding for specific population groups or diseases. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We critically reviewed and categorised previous analyses of aid to specific populations, diseases, or types of activities. We then developed and refined key terms related to newborn survival in seven languages and searched titles and descriptions of donor disbursement records in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Creditor Reporting System database, 2002–2010. We compared results with the Countdown to 2015 database of aid for MNCH (2003–2008) and the search strategy used by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Prior to 2005, key terms related to newborns were rare in disbursement records but their frequency increased markedly thereafter. Only two mentions were found of “stillbirth” and only nine references were found to “fetus” in any spelling variant or language. The total value of non-research disbursements mentioning any newborn search terms rose from US$38.4 million in 2002 to US$717.1 million in 2010 (constant 2010 US$). The value of non-research projects exclusively benefitting newborns fluctuated somewhat but remained low, at US$5.7 million in 2010. The United States and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) provided the largest value of non-research funding mentioning and exclusively benefitting newborns, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Donor attention to newborn survival has increased since 2002, but it appears unlikely that donor aid is commensurate with the 3.0 million newborn deaths and 2.7 million stillbirths each year. We recommend that those tracking funding for other specific population groups, diseases, or activities consider a key term search approach in the Creditor Reporting System along with a detailed review of their data, but that they develop their search terms and interpretations carefully, taking into account the limitations described. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3484125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34841252012-11-01 Donor Funding for Newborn Survival: An Analysis of Donor-Reported Data, 2002–2010 Pitt, Catherine Lawn, Joy E. Ranganathan, Meghna Mills, Anne Hanson, Kara PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Neonatal mortality accounts for 43% of global under-five deaths and is decreasing more slowly than maternal or child mortality. Donor funding has increased for maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH), but no analysis to date has disaggregated aid for newborns. We evaluated if and how aid flows for newborn care can be tracked, examined changes in the last decade, and considered methodological implications for tracking funding for specific population groups or diseases. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We critically reviewed and categorised previous analyses of aid to specific populations, diseases, or types of activities. We then developed and refined key terms related to newborn survival in seven languages and searched titles and descriptions of donor disbursement records in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Creditor Reporting System database, 2002–2010. We compared results with the Countdown to 2015 database of aid for MNCH (2003–2008) and the search strategy used by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Prior to 2005, key terms related to newborns were rare in disbursement records but their frequency increased markedly thereafter. Only two mentions were found of “stillbirth” and only nine references were found to “fetus” in any spelling variant or language. The total value of non-research disbursements mentioning any newborn search terms rose from US$38.4 million in 2002 to US$717.1 million in 2010 (constant 2010 US$). The value of non-research projects exclusively benefitting newborns fluctuated somewhat but remained low, at US$5.7 million in 2010. The United States and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) provided the largest value of non-research funding mentioning and exclusively benefitting newborns, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Donor attention to newborn survival has increased since 2002, but it appears unlikely that donor aid is commensurate with the 3.0 million newborn deaths and 2.7 million stillbirths each year. We recommend that those tracking funding for other specific population groups, diseases, or activities consider a key term search approach in the Creditor Reporting System along with a detailed review of their data, but that they develop their search terms and interpretations carefully, taking into account the limitations described. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2012-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3484125/ /pubmed/23118619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001332 Text en © 2012 Pitt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pitt, Catherine
Lawn, Joy E.
Ranganathan, Meghna
Mills, Anne
Hanson, Kara
Donor Funding for Newborn Survival: An Analysis of Donor-Reported Data, 2002–2010
title Donor Funding for Newborn Survival: An Analysis of Donor-Reported Data, 2002–2010
title_full Donor Funding for Newborn Survival: An Analysis of Donor-Reported Data, 2002–2010
title_fullStr Donor Funding for Newborn Survival: An Analysis of Donor-Reported Data, 2002–2010
title_full_unstemmed Donor Funding for Newborn Survival: An Analysis of Donor-Reported Data, 2002–2010
title_short Donor Funding for Newborn Survival: An Analysis of Donor-Reported Data, 2002–2010
title_sort donor funding for newborn survival: an analysis of donor-reported data, 2002–2010
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001332
work_keys_str_mv AT pittcatherine donorfundingfornewbornsurvivalananalysisofdonorreporteddata20022010
AT lawnjoye donorfundingfornewbornsurvivalananalysisofdonorreporteddata20022010
AT ranganathanmeghna donorfundingfornewbornsurvivalananalysisofdonorreporteddata20022010
AT millsanne donorfundingfornewbornsurvivalananalysisofdonorreporteddata20022010
AT hansonkara donorfundingfornewbornsurvivalananalysisofdonorreporteddata20022010