Cargando…

Intervention Characteristics that Facilitate Return to Work After Sickness Absence: A Systematic Literature Review

Introduction In many Western countries, a vast amount of interventions exist that aim to facilitate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence. These interventions are usually focused on specific target populations such as employees with low back pain, stress-related complaints or adjustment disord...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoefsmit, Nicole, Houkes, Inge, Nijhuis, Frans J. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22476607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9359-z
_version_ 1782248122390413312
author Hoefsmit, Nicole
Houkes, Inge
Nijhuis, Frans J. N.
author_facet Hoefsmit, Nicole
Houkes, Inge
Nijhuis, Frans J. N.
author_sort Hoefsmit, Nicole
collection PubMed
description Introduction In many Western countries, a vast amount of interventions exist that aim to facilitate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence. These interventions are usually focused on specific target populations such as employees with low back pain, stress-related complaints or adjustment disorders. The aim of the present study is to detect and identify characteristics of RTW interventions that generally facilitate return to work (i.e. in multiple target populations and across interventions). This type of knowledge is highly relevant to policy makers and health practitioners who want to deliver evidence based care that supports the employee’s health and participation in labour. Methods We performed a keyword search (systematic literature review) in seven databases (period: 1994–2010). In total, 23 articles were included and assessed for their methodological quality. The characteristics of the interventions were evaluated as well. Results Early interventions, initiated in the first 6 weeks of the RTW process were scarce. These were effective to support RTW though. Multidisciplinary interventions appeared effective to support RTW in multiple target groups (e.g. back pain and adjustment disorders). Time contingent interventions in which activities followed a pre-defined schedule were effective in all physical complaints studied in this review. Activating interventions such as gradual RTW were effective in physical complaints. They have not been studied for people with psychological complaints. Conclusions Early- and multidisciplinary intervention and time-contingent-, activating interventions appear most effective to support RTW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3484272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34842722012-10-31 Intervention Characteristics that Facilitate Return to Work After Sickness Absence: A Systematic Literature Review Hoefsmit, Nicole Houkes, Inge Nijhuis, Frans J. N. J Occup Rehabil Review Introduction In many Western countries, a vast amount of interventions exist that aim to facilitate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence. These interventions are usually focused on specific target populations such as employees with low back pain, stress-related complaints or adjustment disorders. The aim of the present study is to detect and identify characteristics of RTW interventions that generally facilitate return to work (i.e. in multiple target populations and across interventions). This type of knowledge is highly relevant to policy makers and health practitioners who want to deliver evidence based care that supports the employee’s health and participation in labour. Methods We performed a keyword search (systematic literature review) in seven databases (period: 1994–2010). In total, 23 articles were included and assessed for their methodological quality. The characteristics of the interventions were evaluated as well. Results Early interventions, initiated in the first 6 weeks of the RTW process were scarce. These were effective to support RTW though. Multidisciplinary interventions appeared effective to support RTW in multiple target groups (e.g. back pain and adjustment disorders). Time contingent interventions in which activities followed a pre-defined schedule were effective in all physical complaints studied in this review. Activating interventions such as gradual RTW were effective in physical complaints. They have not been studied for people with psychological complaints. Conclusions Early- and multidisciplinary intervention and time-contingent-, activating interventions appear most effective to support RTW. Springer US 2012-04-04 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3484272/ /pubmed/22476607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9359-z Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Hoefsmit, Nicole
Houkes, Inge
Nijhuis, Frans J. N.
Intervention Characteristics that Facilitate Return to Work After Sickness Absence: A Systematic Literature Review
title Intervention Characteristics that Facilitate Return to Work After Sickness Absence: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Intervention Characteristics that Facilitate Return to Work After Sickness Absence: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Intervention Characteristics that Facilitate Return to Work After Sickness Absence: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Intervention Characteristics that Facilitate Return to Work After Sickness Absence: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Intervention Characteristics that Facilitate Return to Work After Sickness Absence: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22476607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9359-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hoefsmitnicole interventioncharacteristicsthatfacilitatereturntoworkaftersicknessabsenceasystematicliteraturereview
AT houkesinge interventioncharacteristicsthatfacilitatereturntoworkaftersicknessabsenceasystematicliteraturereview
AT nijhuisfransjn interventioncharacteristicsthatfacilitatereturntoworkaftersicknessabsenceasystematicliteraturereview