Cargando…

Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode

OBJECTIVE: To assess the image quality and effective radiation dose of prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode (flash mode) of dual-source CT (DSCT) coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with high heart rates (HRs) as compared with retrospectively ECG-gated s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Kai, Han, Rui-Juan, Ma, Li-Jun, Wang, Li-Jun, Li, Li-Gang, Chen, Jiu-Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.6.684
_version_ 1782248126147461120
author Sun, Kai
Han, Rui-Juan
Ma, Li-Jun
Wang, Li-Jun
Li, Li-Gang
Chen, Jiu-Hong
author_facet Sun, Kai
Han, Rui-Juan
Ma, Li-Jun
Wang, Li-Jun
Li, Li-Gang
Chen, Jiu-Hong
author_sort Sun, Kai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the image quality and effective radiation dose of prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode (flash mode) of dual-source CT (DSCT) coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with high heart rates (HRs) as compared with retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-eight consecutive patients (132 female, mean age: 55 ± 11 years) with mean HR > 65 beats per minute (bpm) were prospectively included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups. Collection was performed in group A CTCA using flash mode setting at 20-30% of the R-R interval, and retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode in group B. The image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image quality scores, effective radiation dose and influencing factors on image quality between the two groups were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in image quality scores and proportions of non-diagnostic coronary artery segments between two groups (image quality scores: 1.064 ± 0.306 [group A] vs. 1.084 ± 0.327 [group B], p = 0.063; proportion of non-diagnostic coronary artery segments: segment-based analysis 1.52% (group A) vs. 1.74% (group B), p = 0.345; patient-based analysis 7.5% (group A) vs. 6.7% (group B), p = 0.812). The estimated radiation dose was 1.0 ± 0.16 mSv in group A and 7.1 ± 1.05 mSv in group B (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, in patients with HRs > 65 bpm without cardiac arrhythmia, the prospectively high-pitch spiral-acquisition mode with image-acquired timing set at 20-30% of the R-R interval provides a similar image quality and low rate of non-diagnostic coronary segments to the retrospectively ECG-gated low-pitch spiral acquisition mode, with significant reduction of radiation exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3484288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34842882012-11-02 Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode Sun, Kai Han, Rui-Juan Ma, Li-Jun Wang, Li-Jun Li, Li-Gang Chen, Jiu-Hong Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the image quality and effective radiation dose of prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode (flash mode) of dual-source CT (DSCT) coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with high heart rates (HRs) as compared with retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-eight consecutive patients (132 female, mean age: 55 ± 11 years) with mean HR > 65 beats per minute (bpm) were prospectively included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups. Collection was performed in group A CTCA using flash mode setting at 20-30% of the R-R interval, and retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode in group B. The image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image quality scores, effective radiation dose and influencing factors on image quality between the two groups were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in image quality scores and proportions of non-diagnostic coronary artery segments between two groups (image quality scores: 1.064 ± 0.306 [group A] vs. 1.084 ± 0.327 [group B], p = 0.063; proportion of non-diagnostic coronary artery segments: segment-based analysis 1.52% (group A) vs. 1.74% (group B), p = 0.345; patient-based analysis 7.5% (group A) vs. 6.7% (group B), p = 0.812). The estimated radiation dose was 1.0 ± 0.16 mSv in group A and 7.1 ± 1.05 mSv in group B (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, in patients with HRs > 65 bpm without cardiac arrhythmia, the prospectively high-pitch spiral-acquisition mode with image-acquired timing set at 20-30% of the R-R interval provides a similar image quality and low rate of non-diagnostic coronary segments to the retrospectively ECG-gated low-pitch spiral acquisition mode, with significant reduction of radiation exposure. The Korean Society of Radiology 2012 2012-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3484288/ /pubmed/23118566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.6.684 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sun, Kai
Han, Rui-Juan
Ma, Li-Jun
Wang, Li-Jun
Li, Li-Gang
Chen, Jiu-Hong
Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode
title Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode
title_full Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode
title_fullStr Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode
title_full_unstemmed Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode
title_short Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode
title_sort prospectively electrocardiogram-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode dual-source ct coronary angiography in patients with high heart rates: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated spiral acquisition mode
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.6.684
work_keys_str_mv AT sunkai prospectivelyelectrocardiogramgatedhighpitchspiralacquisitionmodedualsourcectcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithhighheartratescomparisonwithretrospectiveelectrocardiogramgatedspiralacquisitionmode
AT hanruijuan prospectivelyelectrocardiogramgatedhighpitchspiralacquisitionmodedualsourcectcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithhighheartratescomparisonwithretrospectiveelectrocardiogramgatedspiralacquisitionmode
AT malijun prospectivelyelectrocardiogramgatedhighpitchspiralacquisitionmodedualsourcectcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithhighheartratescomparisonwithretrospectiveelectrocardiogramgatedspiralacquisitionmode
AT wanglijun prospectivelyelectrocardiogramgatedhighpitchspiralacquisitionmodedualsourcectcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithhighheartratescomparisonwithretrospectiveelectrocardiogramgatedspiralacquisitionmode
AT liligang prospectivelyelectrocardiogramgatedhighpitchspiralacquisitionmodedualsourcectcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithhighheartratescomparisonwithretrospectiveelectrocardiogramgatedspiralacquisitionmode
AT chenjiuhong prospectivelyelectrocardiogramgatedhighpitchspiralacquisitionmodedualsourcectcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithhighheartratescomparisonwithretrospectiveelectrocardiogramgatedspiralacquisitionmode