Cargando…
The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses
The hierarchy of evidence based medicine postulates that systematic reviews of homogenous randomized trials represent one of the uppermost levels of clinical evidence. Indeed, the current overwhelming role of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses in evidence based heath care...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23439862 |
_version_ | 1782248172306825216 |
---|---|
author | Biondi-Zoccai, G Lotrionte, M Landoni, G Modena, M G |
author_facet | Biondi-Zoccai, G Lotrionte, M Landoni, G Modena, M G |
author_sort | Biondi-Zoccai, G |
collection | PubMed |
description | The hierarchy of evidence based medicine postulates that systematic reviews of homogenous randomized trials represent one of the uppermost levels of clinical evidence. Indeed, the current overwhelming role of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses in evidence based heath care calls for a thorough knowledge of the pros and cons of these study designs, even for the busy clinician. Despite this sore need, few succinct but thorough resources are available to guide users or would-be authors of systematic reviews. This article provides a rough guide to reading and, summarily, designing and conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3484632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34846322013-02-25 The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses Biondi-Zoccai, G Lotrionte, M Landoni, G Modena, M G HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth Review-Article The hierarchy of evidence based medicine postulates that systematic reviews of homogenous randomized trials represent one of the uppermost levels of clinical evidence. Indeed, the current overwhelming role of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses in evidence based heath care calls for a thorough knowledge of the pros and cons of these study designs, even for the busy clinician. Despite this sore need, few succinct but thorough resources are available to guide users or would-be authors of systematic reviews. This article provides a rough guide to reading and, summarily, designing and conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3484632/ /pubmed/23439862 Text en Copyright © 2011, HSR Proceedings in Intensive Care and Cardiovascular Anesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License 3.0, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Review-Article Biondi-Zoccai, G Lotrionte, M Landoni, G Modena, M G The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title | The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title_full | The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title_fullStr | The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title_short | The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title_sort | rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
topic | Review-Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23439862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biondizoccaig theroughguidetosystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses AT lotriontem theroughguidetosystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses AT landonig theroughguidetosystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses AT modenamg theroughguidetosystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses AT biondizoccaig roughguidetosystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses AT lotriontem roughguidetosystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses AT landonig roughguidetosystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses AT modenamg roughguidetosystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses |