Cargando…
Use of the LUCAS mechanical chest compression device for percutaneous coronary intervention during cardiac arrest: is it really a game changer?
Cardiopulmonary support including closed chest compression is a mainstay in the management of cardiac arrest. However, traditional means (i.e. manual) chest compression may be logistically challenging, especially in patients requiring emergent invasive procedures such as percutaneous coronary interv...
Autores principales: | Biondi-Zoccai, G, Landoni, G, Zangrillo, A, Agostoni, P, Sangiorgi, G, Modena, M G |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23439929 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bystander-initiated chest compression-only CPR is better than standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
por: Cabrini, L, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority
por: Koster, Rudolph W, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hints
por: Greco, T, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
A journey into clinical evidence: from case reports to mixed treatment comparisons
por: Biondi-Zoccai, G, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Comparison of in-hospital use of mechanical chest compression devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: AUTOPULSE vs LUCAS
por: Kim, Hyun Tae, et al.
Publicado: (2019)