Cargando…

Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method

OBJECTIVE: One of the main criteria in evaluating the restorative materials is the degree of microleakage. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of glass ionomer restored cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser or turbine and bur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty extracted caries-free deciduo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghandehari, M., Mighani, G., Shahabi, S., Chiniforush, N., Shirmohammadi, Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23119130
_version_ 1782248194358378496
author Ghandehari, M.
Mighani, G.
Shahabi, S.
Chiniforush, N.
Shirmohammadi, Z.
author_facet Ghandehari, M.
Mighani, G.
Shahabi, S.
Chiniforush, N.
Shirmohammadi, Z.
author_sort Ghandehari, M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: One of the main criteria in evaluating the restorative materials is the degree of microleakage. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of glass ionomer restored cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser or turbine and bur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty extracted caries-free deciduous posterior teeth were selected for this study. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups for cavity preparation. Cavities in group one were prepared by high speed turbine and bur. In the second group, Er:YAG laser with a 3W output power, 300 mJ energy and 10 Hz frequency was used. Cavities were restored with GC Fuji II LC. After thermocycling, the samples were immersed into 0.5% methylene blue solution. They were sectioned for examination under optic microscope. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon signed ranks test showed no significant difference between microleakage of the laser group and the conventional group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Er:YAG laser with its advantages in pediatric dentistry may be suggested as an alternative device for cavity preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3484825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34848252012-11-01 Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method Ghandehari, M. Mighani, G. Shahabi, S. Chiniforush, N. Shirmohammadi, Z. J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVE: One of the main criteria in evaluating the restorative materials is the degree of microleakage. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of glass ionomer restored cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser or turbine and bur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty extracted caries-free deciduous posterior teeth were selected for this study. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups for cavity preparation. Cavities in group one were prepared by high speed turbine and bur. In the second group, Er:YAG laser with a 3W output power, 300 mJ energy and 10 Hz frequency was used. Cavities were restored with GC Fuji II LC. After thermocycling, the samples were immersed into 0.5% methylene blue solution. They were sectioned for examination under optic microscope. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon signed ranks test showed no significant difference between microleakage of the laser group and the conventional group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Er:YAG laser with its advantages in pediatric dentistry may be suggested as an alternative device for cavity preparation. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012-09-30 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3484825/ /pubmed/23119130 Text en Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghandehari, M.
Mighani, G.
Shahabi, S.
Chiniforush, N.
Shirmohammadi, Z.
Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method
title Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method
title_full Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method
title_fullStr Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method
title_short Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method
title_sort comparison of microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in primary teeth prepared by er: yag laser and the conventional method
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23119130
work_keys_str_mv AT ghandeharim comparisonofmicroleakageofglassionomerrestorationinprimaryteethpreparedbyeryaglaserandtheconventionalmethod
AT mighanig comparisonofmicroleakageofglassionomerrestorationinprimaryteethpreparedbyeryaglaserandtheconventionalmethod
AT shahabis comparisonofmicroleakageofglassionomerrestorationinprimaryteethpreparedbyeryaglaserandtheconventionalmethod
AT chiniforushn comparisonofmicroleakageofglassionomerrestorationinprimaryteethpreparedbyeryaglaserandtheconventionalmethod
AT shirmohammadiz comparisonofmicroleakageofglassionomerrestorationinprimaryteethpreparedbyeryaglaserandtheconventionalmethod