Cargando…
Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method
OBJECTIVE: One of the main criteria in evaluating the restorative materials is the degree of microleakage. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of glass ionomer restored cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser or turbine and bur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty extracted caries-free deciduo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23119130 |
_version_ | 1782248194358378496 |
---|---|
author | Ghandehari, M. Mighani, G. Shahabi, S. Chiniforush, N. Shirmohammadi, Z. |
author_facet | Ghandehari, M. Mighani, G. Shahabi, S. Chiniforush, N. Shirmohammadi, Z. |
author_sort | Ghandehari, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: One of the main criteria in evaluating the restorative materials is the degree of microleakage. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of glass ionomer restored cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser or turbine and bur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty extracted caries-free deciduous posterior teeth were selected for this study. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups for cavity preparation. Cavities in group one were prepared by high speed turbine and bur. In the second group, Er:YAG laser with a 3W output power, 300 mJ energy and 10 Hz frequency was used. Cavities were restored with GC Fuji II LC. After thermocycling, the samples were immersed into 0.5% methylene blue solution. They were sectioned for examination under optic microscope. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon signed ranks test showed no significant difference between microleakage of the laser group and the conventional group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Er:YAG laser with its advantages in pediatric dentistry may be suggested as an alternative device for cavity preparation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3484825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34848252012-11-01 Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method Ghandehari, M. Mighani, G. Shahabi, S. Chiniforush, N. Shirmohammadi, Z. J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVE: One of the main criteria in evaluating the restorative materials is the degree of microleakage. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of glass ionomer restored cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser or turbine and bur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty extracted caries-free deciduous posterior teeth were selected for this study. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups for cavity preparation. Cavities in group one were prepared by high speed turbine and bur. In the second group, Er:YAG laser with a 3W output power, 300 mJ energy and 10 Hz frequency was used. Cavities were restored with GC Fuji II LC. After thermocycling, the samples were immersed into 0.5% methylene blue solution. They were sectioned for examination under optic microscope. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon signed ranks test showed no significant difference between microleakage of the laser group and the conventional group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Er:YAG laser with its advantages in pediatric dentistry may be suggested as an alternative device for cavity preparation. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012-09-30 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3484825/ /pubmed/23119130 Text en Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ghandehari, M. Mighani, G. Shahabi, S. Chiniforush, N. Shirmohammadi, Z. Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method |
title | Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method |
title_full | Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method |
title_short | Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method |
title_sort | comparison of microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in primary teeth prepared by er: yag laser and the conventional method |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23119130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghandeharim comparisonofmicroleakageofglassionomerrestorationinprimaryteethpreparedbyeryaglaserandtheconventionalmethod AT mighanig comparisonofmicroleakageofglassionomerrestorationinprimaryteethpreparedbyeryaglaserandtheconventionalmethod AT shahabis comparisonofmicroleakageofglassionomerrestorationinprimaryteethpreparedbyeryaglaserandtheconventionalmethod AT chiniforushn comparisonofmicroleakageofglassionomerrestorationinprimaryteethpreparedbyeryaglaserandtheconventionalmethod AT shirmohammadiz comparisonofmicroleakageofglassionomerrestorationinprimaryteethpreparedbyeryaglaserandtheconventionalmethod |