Cargando…
Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?
“Are Chimpanzees synaesthetic?” An affirmative answer to this question appeared recently in a Nature commentary on a study by Ludwig, Adachi, and Matzuzawa (2011) that demonstrated crossmodal correspondences in both chimpanzees and humans. Here we question the claim that chimpanzees are synaesthetic...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pion
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3485825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0526ic |
_version_ | 1782248354813575168 |
---|---|
author | Spence, Charles Deroy, Ophelia |
author_facet | Spence, Charles Deroy, Ophelia |
author_sort | Spence, Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | “Are Chimpanzees synaesthetic?” An affirmative answer to this question appeared recently in a Nature commentary on a study by Ludwig, Adachi, and Matzuzawa (2011) that demonstrated crossmodal correspondences in both chimpanzees and humans. Here we question the claim that chimpanzees are synaesthetic. We also question the claim that certain crossmodal correspondences are innate. We suggest an alternative account for the crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual lightness in terms of the internalization of correlations present in the environment. We highlight the limitations of such natural correlation approaches to the study of crossmodal correspondences as well as how such claims could potentially be tested in future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3485825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Pion |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34858252012-11-09 Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned? Spence, Charles Deroy, Ophelia Iperception i-Comment “Are Chimpanzees synaesthetic?” An affirmative answer to this question appeared recently in a Nature commentary on a study by Ludwig, Adachi, and Matzuzawa (2011) that demonstrated crossmodal correspondences in both chimpanzees and humans. Here we question the claim that chimpanzees are synaesthetic. We also question the claim that certain crossmodal correspondences are innate. We suggest an alternative account for the crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual lightness in terms of the internalization of correlations present in the environment. We highlight the limitations of such natural correlation approaches to the study of crossmodal correspondences as well as how such claims could potentially be tested in future research. Pion 2012-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3485825/ /pubmed/23145286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0526ic Text en Copyright © 2012 C Spencer, O Deroy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Licence, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author(s) and source are credited and no alterations are made. |
spellingShingle | i-Comment Spence, Charles Deroy, Ophelia Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned? |
title | Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned? |
title_full | Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned? |
title_fullStr | Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned? |
title_full_unstemmed | Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned? |
title_short | Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned? |
title_sort | crossmodal correspondences: innate or learned? |
topic | i-Comment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3485825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0526ic |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spencecharles crossmodalcorrespondencesinnateorlearned AT deroyophelia crossmodalcorrespondencesinnateorlearned |