Cargando…

Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?

“Are Chimpanzees synaesthetic?” An affirmative answer to this question appeared recently in a Nature commentary on a study by Ludwig, Adachi, and Matzuzawa (2011) that demonstrated crossmodal correspondences in both chimpanzees and humans. Here we question the claim that chimpanzees are synaesthetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spence, Charles, Deroy, Ophelia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pion 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3485825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0526ic
_version_ 1782248354813575168
author Spence, Charles
Deroy, Ophelia
author_facet Spence, Charles
Deroy, Ophelia
author_sort Spence, Charles
collection PubMed
description “Are Chimpanzees synaesthetic?” An affirmative answer to this question appeared recently in a Nature commentary on a study by Ludwig, Adachi, and Matzuzawa (2011) that demonstrated crossmodal correspondences in both chimpanzees and humans. Here we question the claim that chimpanzees are synaesthetic. We also question the claim that certain crossmodal correspondences are innate. We suggest an alternative account for the crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual lightness in terms of the internalization of correlations present in the environment. We highlight the limitations of such natural correlation approaches to the study of crossmodal correspondences as well as how such claims could potentially be tested in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3485825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Pion
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34858252012-11-09 Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned? Spence, Charles Deroy, Ophelia Iperception i-Comment “Are Chimpanzees synaesthetic?” An affirmative answer to this question appeared recently in a Nature commentary on a study by Ludwig, Adachi, and Matzuzawa (2011) that demonstrated crossmodal correspondences in both chimpanzees and humans. Here we question the claim that chimpanzees are synaesthetic. We also question the claim that certain crossmodal correspondences are innate. We suggest an alternative account for the crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual lightness in terms of the internalization of correlations present in the environment. We highlight the limitations of such natural correlation approaches to the study of crossmodal correspondences as well as how such claims could potentially be tested in future research. Pion 2012-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3485825/ /pubmed/23145286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0526ic Text en Copyright © 2012 C Spencer, O Deroy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Licence, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author(s) and source are credited and no alterations are made.
spellingShingle i-Comment
Spence, Charles
Deroy, Ophelia
Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?
title Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?
title_full Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?
title_fullStr Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?
title_full_unstemmed Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?
title_short Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?
title_sort crossmodal correspondences: innate or learned?
topic i-Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3485825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0526ic
work_keys_str_mv AT spencecharles crossmodalcorrespondencesinnateorlearned
AT deroyophelia crossmodalcorrespondencesinnateorlearned