Cargando…

Does Additional Aortic Procedure Carry a Higher Risk in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement?

BACKGROUND: With growing attention to the aortopathy associated with aortic valve diseases, the number of candidates for accompanying ascending aorta and/or root replacement is increasing among the patients who require aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, such procedures have been considered mor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae-Hun, Park, Kay-Hyun, Yoo, Jae Suk, Lee, Jae Hang, Lim, Cheong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130302
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2012.45.5.295
_version_ 1782248433911857152
author Kim, Tae-Hun
Park, Kay-Hyun
Yoo, Jae Suk
Lee, Jae Hang
Lim, Cheong
author_facet Kim, Tae-Hun
Park, Kay-Hyun
Yoo, Jae Suk
Lee, Jae Hang
Lim, Cheong
author_sort Kim, Tae-Hun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With growing attention to the aortopathy associated with aortic valve diseases, the number of candidates for accompanying ascending aorta and/or root replacement is increasing among the patients who require aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, such procedures have been considered more risky than AVR alone. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcome of isolated AVR and AVR combined with aortic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 86 patients who underwent elective AVR between 2004 and June 2010 were divided into two groups: complex AVR (n=50, AVR with ascending aorta replacement in 24 and the Bentall procedure in 26) and simple AVR (n=36). Preoperative characteristics, surgical data, intra- and postoperative allogenic blood transfusion requirement, the postoperative clinical course, and major complications were retrospectively reviewed and compared. RESULTS: The preoperative mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (%) did not differ between the groups: 11.0±7.8% in the complex AVR group and 12.3±8.0% in the simple AVR group. Although complex AVR required longer cardiopulmonary bypass (152.4±52.6 minutes vs. 109.7±22.7 minutes, p=0.001), the quantity of allogenic blood products did not differ (13.4±14.7 units vs. 13.9±11.2 units). There was no mortality, mechanical circulatory support, stroke, or renal failure requiring hemodialysis/filtration. No difference was found in the incidence of bleeding (40% vs. 33.3%) which was defined as red blood cell transfusion ≥5 units, reoperation, or intentional delayed closure. The incidence of mediastinitis (2.0% vs. 0%), ventilator ≥24 hours (4.0% vs. 2.8%), atrial fibrillation (18.0% vs. 25.0%), mean intensive care unit stay (34.5 hours vs. 38.8 hours), and median hospital stay (8 days vs. 7 days) did not differ, either. CONCLUSION: AVR combined with additional aortic or root replacement showed an excellent outcome and recovery course equivalent to that after isolated AVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3487012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34870122012-11-05 Does Additional Aortic Procedure Carry a Higher Risk in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement? Kim, Tae-Hun Park, Kay-Hyun Yoo, Jae Suk Lee, Jae Hang Lim, Cheong Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Clinical Research BACKGROUND: With growing attention to the aortopathy associated with aortic valve diseases, the number of candidates for accompanying ascending aorta and/or root replacement is increasing among the patients who require aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, such procedures have been considered more risky than AVR alone. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcome of isolated AVR and AVR combined with aortic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 86 patients who underwent elective AVR between 2004 and June 2010 were divided into two groups: complex AVR (n=50, AVR with ascending aorta replacement in 24 and the Bentall procedure in 26) and simple AVR (n=36). Preoperative characteristics, surgical data, intra- and postoperative allogenic blood transfusion requirement, the postoperative clinical course, and major complications were retrospectively reviewed and compared. RESULTS: The preoperative mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (%) did not differ between the groups: 11.0±7.8% in the complex AVR group and 12.3±8.0% in the simple AVR group. Although complex AVR required longer cardiopulmonary bypass (152.4±52.6 minutes vs. 109.7±22.7 minutes, p=0.001), the quantity of allogenic blood products did not differ (13.4±14.7 units vs. 13.9±11.2 units). There was no mortality, mechanical circulatory support, stroke, or renal failure requiring hemodialysis/filtration. No difference was found in the incidence of bleeding (40% vs. 33.3%) which was defined as red blood cell transfusion ≥5 units, reoperation, or intentional delayed closure. The incidence of mediastinitis (2.0% vs. 0%), ventilator ≥24 hours (4.0% vs. 2.8%), atrial fibrillation (18.0% vs. 25.0%), mean intensive care unit stay (34.5 hours vs. 38.8 hours), and median hospital stay (8 days vs. 7 days) did not differ, either. CONCLUSION: AVR combined with additional aortic or root replacement showed an excellent outcome and recovery course equivalent to that after isolated AVR. Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2012-10 2012-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3487012/ /pubmed/23130302 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2012.45.5.295 Text en © The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2012. All right reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Kim, Tae-Hun
Park, Kay-Hyun
Yoo, Jae Suk
Lee, Jae Hang
Lim, Cheong
Does Additional Aortic Procedure Carry a Higher Risk in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement?
title Does Additional Aortic Procedure Carry a Higher Risk in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement?
title_full Does Additional Aortic Procedure Carry a Higher Risk in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement?
title_fullStr Does Additional Aortic Procedure Carry a Higher Risk in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement?
title_full_unstemmed Does Additional Aortic Procedure Carry a Higher Risk in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement?
title_short Does Additional Aortic Procedure Carry a Higher Risk in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement?
title_sort does additional aortic procedure carry a higher risk in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130302
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2012.45.5.295
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaehun doesadditionalaorticprocedurecarryahigherriskinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacement
AT parkkayhyun doesadditionalaorticprocedurecarryahigherriskinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacement
AT yoojaesuk doesadditionalaorticprocedurecarryahigherriskinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacement
AT leejaehang doesadditionalaorticprocedurecarryahigherriskinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacement
AT limcheong doesadditionalaorticprocedurecarryahigherriskinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacement