Cargando…

Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study

Objective To compare the risk of cervical cancer in women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia who returned to routine screening after having completed post-treatment follow-up with consecutive normal smear test results with women with a normal primary smear test result....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebolj, Matejka, Helmerhorst, Theo, Habbema, Dik, Looman, Caspar, Boer, Rob, van Rosmalen, Joost, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23117059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6855
_version_ 1782248437832482816
author Rebolj, Matejka
Helmerhorst, Theo
Habbema, Dik
Looman, Caspar
Boer, Rob
van Rosmalen, Joost
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
author_facet Rebolj, Matejka
Helmerhorst, Theo
Habbema, Dik
Looman, Caspar
Boer, Rob
van Rosmalen, Joost
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
author_sort Rebolj, Matejka
collection PubMed
description Objective To compare the risk of cervical cancer in women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia who returned to routine screening after having completed post-treatment follow-up with consecutive normal smear test results with women with a normal primary smear test result. Design Population based cohort study using data from a nationwide pathology register. Setting The Netherlands, 1994 to 2006. Population 38 956 women with histologically confirmed intraepithelial neoplasia grades 1 to 3 with completed follow-up after treatment. Intervention Routine post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, recommending smear tests at six, 12, and 24 months. Main outcome measure Incidence of cervical cancer in the period from completed follow-up with negative test results after cervical intraepithelial neoplasia to the next primary test. 10-year hazard ratios were compared with periods after normal results for the primary smear test, adjusted for year in follow-up. Results 20 cervical cancers were diagnosed during 56 956 woman years after completed follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, whereas 1613 cervical cancers were diagnosed during 25 020 697 woman years after a normal primary smear test result. The incidence of 35.1 (95% confidence interval 21.4 to 54.2) per 100 000 woman years and 6.4 (6.1 to 6.8) per 100 000 woman years, respectively, led to an adjusted hazard ratio of 4.2 (95% confidence interval 2.7 to 6.5) for periods after completed follow-up compared with periods after normal primary smear test results. This hazard ratio was increased for all ages. No significant difference in risk of cervical cancer was observed by grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Conclusions An excess risk of cervical cancer previously observed for women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was also observed in the subgroup of women who completed their post-treatment follow-up with three consecutive normal smear test results. The overall corrected risk of cervical cancer in these women was increased fourfold 35 cases per 100 000 woman years) compared with women with normal primary smear test results (6 per 100 000 woman years).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3487103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34871032012-11-02 Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study Rebolj, Matejka Helmerhorst, Theo Habbema, Dik Looman, Caspar Boer, Rob van Rosmalen, Joost van Ballegooijen, Marjolein BMJ Research Objective To compare the risk of cervical cancer in women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia who returned to routine screening after having completed post-treatment follow-up with consecutive normal smear test results with women with a normal primary smear test result. Design Population based cohort study using data from a nationwide pathology register. Setting The Netherlands, 1994 to 2006. Population 38 956 women with histologically confirmed intraepithelial neoplasia grades 1 to 3 with completed follow-up after treatment. Intervention Routine post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, recommending smear tests at six, 12, and 24 months. Main outcome measure Incidence of cervical cancer in the period from completed follow-up with negative test results after cervical intraepithelial neoplasia to the next primary test. 10-year hazard ratios were compared with periods after normal results for the primary smear test, adjusted for year in follow-up. Results 20 cervical cancers were diagnosed during 56 956 woman years after completed follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, whereas 1613 cervical cancers were diagnosed during 25 020 697 woman years after a normal primary smear test result. The incidence of 35.1 (95% confidence interval 21.4 to 54.2) per 100 000 woman years and 6.4 (6.1 to 6.8) per 100 000 woman years, respectively, led to an adjusted hazard ratio of 4.2 (95% confidence interval 2.7 to 6.5) for periods after completed follow-up compared with periods after normal primary smear test results. This hazard ratio was increased for all ages. No significant difference in risk of cervical cancer was observed by grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Conclusions An excess risk of cervical cancer previously observed for women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was also observed in the subgroup of women who completed their post-treatment follow-up with three consecutive normal smear test results. The overall corrected risk of cervical cancer in these women was increased fourfold 35 cases per 100 000 woman years) compared with women with normal primary smear test results (6 per 100 000 woman years). BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3487103/ /pubmed/23117059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6855 Text en © Rebolj et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Rebolj, Matejka
Helmerhorst, Theo
Habbema, Dik
Looman, Caspar
Boer, Rob
van Rosmalen, Joost
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study
title Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study
title_full Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study
title_fullStr Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study
title_short Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study
title_sort risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23117059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6855
work_keys_str_mv AT reboljmatejka riskofcervicalcanceraftercompletedposttreatmentfollowupofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT helmerhorsttheo riskofcervicalcanceraftercompletedposttreatmentfollowupofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT habbemadik riskofcervicalcanceraftercompletedposttreatmentfollowupofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT loomancaspar riskofcervicalcanceraftercompletedposttreatmentfollowupofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT boerrob riskofcervicalcanceraftercompletedposttreatmentfollowupofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT vanrosmalenjoost riskofcervicalcanceraftercompletedposttreatmentfollowupofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT vanballegooijenmarjolein riskofcervicalcanceraftercompletedposttreatmentfollowupofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiapopulationbasedcohortstudy