Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reaction reporting forms for introduction of a spontaneous generic ADR form
Despite comprehensive and stringent phases of clinical trials and surveillance efforts, unexpected and serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) repeatedly occur after the drug is marketed. ADR reporting is an important aspect of an efficient and effective pharmacovigilance program. Although Medwatch, Y...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23129957 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.99417 |
_version_ | 1782248454670516224 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Anshi Bhatt, Parloop |
author_facet | Singh, Anshi Bhatt, Parloop |
author_sort | Singh, Anshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite comprehensive and stringent phases of clinical trials and surveillance efforts, unexpected and serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) repeatedly occur after the drug is marketed. ADR reporting is an important aspect of an efficient and effective pharmacovigilance program. Although Medwatch, Yellow Card, CDSCO form, etc. are the protocol forms of ADR collection and reports, a number of countries design and use their respective ADR forms. This review compares similarities and dissimilarities of 13 ADR forms of countries representing their geographical location. This study extracted 73 data elements mentioned in 13 different ADR forms. Only 13 elements were common. An ADR form of Malaysia and Canada covers the highest number of data 43, while Brazil falls to the opposite end with a number of 17 data elements in lieu with the Generic ADR Form. The result of this review highlights 58 data elements of the proposed generic ADR form which ensures that requisite reporting information essential for correct causality assessment of ADRs are included. The proposed “Generic ADR form” could be adopted worldwide mandatorily for reporting any/all ADRs associated with marketed drugs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3487270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34872702012-11-05 Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reaction reporting forms for introduction of a spontaneous generic ADR form Singh, Anshi Bhatt, Parloop J Pharmacol Pharmacother Mini Review Despite comprehensive and stringent phases of clinical trials and surveillance efforts, unexpected and serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) repeatedly occur after the drug is marketed. ADR reporting is an important aspect of an efficient and effective pharmacovigilance program. Although Medwatch, Yellow Card, CDSCO form, etc. are the protocol forms of ADR collection and reports, a number of countries design and use their respective ADR forms. This review compares similarities and dissimilarities of 13 ADR forms of countries representing their geographical location. This study extracted 73 data elements mentioned in 13 different ADR forms. Only 13 elements were common. An ADR form of Malaysia and Canada covers the highest number of data 43, while Brazil falls to the opposite end with a number of 17 data elements in lieu with the Generic ADR Form. The result of this review highlights 58 data elements of the proposed generic ADR form which ensures that requisite reporting information essential for correct causality assessment of ADRs are included. The proposed “Generic ADR form” could be adopted worldwide mandatorily for reporting any/all ADRs associated with marketed drugs. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3487270/ /pubmed/23129957 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.99417 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Mini Review Singh, Anshi Bhatt, Parloop Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reaction reporting forms for introduction of a spontaneous generic ADR form |
title | Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reaction reporting forms for introduction of a spontaneous generic ADR form |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reaction reporting forms for introduction of a spontaneous generic ADR form |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reaction reporting forms for introduction of a spontaneous generic ADR form |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reaction reporting forms for introduction of a spontaneous generic ADR form |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reaction reporting forms for introduction of a spontaneous generic ADR form |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of adverse drug reaction reporting forms for introduction of a spontaneous generic adr form |
topic | Mini Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23129957 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.99417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhanshi comparativeevaluationofadversedrugreactionreportingformsforintroductionofaspontaneousgenericadrform AT bhattparloop comparativeevaluationofadversedrugreactionreportingformsforintroductionofaspontaneousgenericadrform |