Cargando…
Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke
BACKGROUND—: Emergency medical services (EMS) hospital prenotification of an incoming stroke patient is guideline recommended as a means of increasing the timeliness with which stroke patients are evaluated and treated. Still, data are limited with regard to national use of, variations in, and tempo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.002345 |
_version_ | 1782248475505721344 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Cheryl B. Peterson, Eric D. Smith, Eric E. Saver, Jeffrey L. Liang, Li Xian, Ying Olson, DaiWai M. Shah, Bimal R. Hernandez, Adrian F. Schwamm, Lee H. Fonarow, Gregg C. |
author_facet | Lin, Cheryl B. Peterson, Eric D. Smith, Eric E. Saver, Jeffrey L. Liang, Li Xian, Ying Olson, DaiWai M. Shah, Bimal R. Hernandez, Adrian F. Schwamm, Lee H. Fonarow, Gregg C. |
author_sort | Lin, Cheryl B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND—: Emergency medical services (EMS) hospital prenotification of an incoming stroke patient is guideline recommended as a means of increasing the timeliness with which stroke patients are evaluated and treated. Still, data are limited with regard to national use of, variations in, and temporal trends in EMS prenotification and associated predictors of its use. METHODS AND RESULTS—: We examined 371 988 patients with acute ischemic stroke who were transported by EMS and enrolled in 1585 hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines—Stroke from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2011. Prenotification occurred in 249 197 EMS‐transported patients (67.0%) and varied widely by hospital (range, 0% to 100%). Substantial variations by geographic regions and by state, ranging from 19.7% in Washington, DC, to 93.4% in Montana, also were noted. Patient factors associated with lower use of prenotification included older age, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. Prenotification was less likely for black patients than for white patients (adjusted odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.92–0.97, P<0.0001). Hospital factors associated with greater EMS prenotification use were absence of academic affiliation, higher annual volume of tissue plasminogen activator administration, and geographic location outside the Northeast. Temporal improvements in prenotification rates showed a modest general increase, from 58.0% in 2003 to 67.3% in 2011 (P temporal trend <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS—: EMS hospital prenotification is guideline recommended, yet among patients transported to Get With The Guidelines—Stroke hospitals it is not provided for 1 in 3 EMS‐arriving patients with acute ischemic stroke and varies substantially by hospital, state, and region. These results support the need for enhanced implementation of stroke systems of care. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e002345 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.002345.) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3487363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34873632012-11-03 Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke Lin, Cheryl B. Peterson, Eric D. Smith, Eric E. Saver, Jeffrey L. Liang, Li Xian, Ying Olson, DaiWai M. Shah, Bimal R. Hernandez, Adrian F. Schwamm, Lee H. Fonarow, Gregg C. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND—: Emergency medical services (EMS) hospital prenotification of an incoming stroke patient is guideline recommended as a means of increasing the timeliness with which stroke patients are evaluated and treated. Still, data are limited with regard to national use of, variations in, and temporal trends in EMS prenotification and associated predictors of its use. METHODS AND RESULTS—: We examined 371 988 patients with acute ischemic stroke who were transported by EMS and enrolled in 1585 hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines—Stroke from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2011. Prenotification occurred in 249 197 EMS‐transported patients (67.0%) and varied widely by hospital (range, 0% to 100%). Substantial variations by geographic regions and by state, ranging from 19.7% in Washington, DC, to 93.4% in Montana, also were noted. Patient factors associated with lower use of prenotification included older age, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. Prenotification was less likely for black patients than for white patients (adjusted odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.92–0.97, P<0.0001). Hospital factors associated with greater EMS prenotification use were absence of academic affiliation, higher annual volume of tissue plasminogen activator administration, and geographic location outside the Northeast. Temporal improvements in prenotification rates showed a modest general increase, from 58.0% in 2003 to 67.3% in 2011 (P temporal trend <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS—: EMS hospital prenotification is guideline recommended, yet among patients transported to Get With The Guidelines—Stroke hospitals it is not provided for 1 in 3 EMS‐arriving patients with acute ischemic stroke and varies substantially by hospital, state, and region. These results support the need for enhanced implementation of stroke systems of care. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e002345 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.002345.) Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3487363/ /pubmed/23130167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.002345 Text en © 2012 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley-Blackwell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lin, Cheryl B. Peterson, Eric D. Smith, Eric E. Saver, Jeffrey L. Liang, Li Xian, Ying Olson, DaiWai M. Shah, Bimal R. Hernandez, Adrian F. Schwamm, Lee H. Fonarow, Gregg C. Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title | Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_full | Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_fullStr | Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_short | Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_sort | patterns, predictors, variations, and temporal trends in emergency medical service hospital prenotification for acute ischemic stroke |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.002345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lincherylb patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke AT petersonericd patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke AT smitherice patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke AT saverjeffreyl patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke AT liangli patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke AT xianying patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke AT olsondaiwaim patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke AT shahbimalr patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke AT hernandezadrianf patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke AT schwammleeh patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke AT fonarowgreggc patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke |