Cargando…

Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND—: Emergency medical services (EMS) hospital prenotification of an incoming stroke patient is guideline recommended as a means of increasing the timeliness with which stroke patients are evaluated and treated. Still, data are limited with regard to national use of, variations in, and tempo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Cheryl B., Peterson, Eric D., Smith, Eric E., Saver, Jeffrey L., Liang, Li, Xian, Ying, Olson, DaiWai M., Shah, Bimal R., Hernandez, Adrian F., Schwamm, Lee H., Fonarow, Gregg C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.002345
_version_ 1782248475505721344
author Lin, Cheryl B.
Peterson, Eric D.
Smith, Eric E.
Saver, Jeffrey L.
Liang, Li
Xian, Ying
Olson, DaiWai M.
Shah, Bimal R.
Hernandez, Adrian F.
Schwamm, Lee H.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
author_facet Lin, Cheryl B.
Peterson, Eric D.
Smith, Eric E.
Saver, Jeffrey L.
Liang, Li
Xian, Ying
Olson, DaiWai M.
Shah, Bimal R.
Hernandez, Adrian F.
Schwamm, Lee H.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
author_sort Lin, Cheryl B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND—: Emergency medical services (EMS) hospital prenotification of an incoming stroke patient is guideline recommended as a means of increasing the timeliness with which stroke patients are evaluated and treated. Still, data are limited with regard to national use of, variations in, and temporal trends in EMS prenotification and associated predictors of its use. METHODS AND RESULTS—: We examined 371 988 patients with acute ischemic stroke who were transported by EMS and enrolled in 1585 hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines—Stroke from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2011. Prenotification occurred in 249 197 EMS‐transported patients (67.0%) and varied widely by hospital (range, 0% to 100%). Substantial variations by geographic regions and by state, ranging from 19.7% in Washington, DC, to 93.4% in Montana, also were noted. Patient factors associated with lower use of prenotification included older age, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. Prenotification was less likely for black patients than for white patients (adjusted odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.92–0.97, P<0.0001). Hospital factors associated with greater EMS prenotification use were absence of academic affiliation, higher annual volume of tissue plasminogen activator administration, and geographic location outside the Northeast. Temporal improvements in prenotification rates showed a modest general increase, from 58.0% in 2003 to 67.3% in 2011 (P temporal trend <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS—: EMS hospital prenotification is guideline recommended, yet among patients transported to Get With The Guidelines—Stroke hospitals it is not provided for 1 in 3 EMS‐arriving patients with acute ischemic stroke and varies substantially by hospital, state, and region. These results support the need for enhanced implementation of stroke systems of care. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e002345 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.002345.)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3487363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34873632012-11-03 Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke Lin, Cheryl B. Peterson, Eric D. Smith, Eric E. Saver, Jeffrey L. Liang, Li Xian, Ying Olson, DaiWai M. Shah, Bimal R. Hernandez, Adrian F. Schwamm, Lee H. Fonarow, Gregg C. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND—: Emergency medical services (EMS) hospital prenotification of an incoming stroke patient is guideline recommended as a means of increasing the timeliness with which stroke patients are evaluated and treated. Still, data are limited with regard to national use of, variations in, and temporal trends in EMS prenotification and associated predictors of its use. METHODS AND RESULTS—: We examined 371 988 patients with acute ischemic stroke who were transported by EMS and enrolled in 1585 hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines—Stroke from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2011. Prenotification occurred in 249 197 EMS‐transported patients (67.0%) and varied widely by hospital (range, 0% to 100%). Substantial variations by geographic regions and by state, ranging from 19.7% in Washington, DC, to 93.4% in Montana, also were noted. Patient factors associated with lower use of prenotification included older age, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. Prenotification was less likely for black patients than for white patients (adjusted odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.92–0.97, P<0.0001). Hospital factors associated with greater EMS prenotification use were absence of academic affiliation, higher annual volume of tissue plasminogen activator administration, and geographic location outside the Northeast. Temporal improvements in prenotification rates showed a modest general increase, from 58.0% in 2003 to 67.3% in 2011 (P temporal trend <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS—: EMS hospital prenotification is guideline recommended, yet among patients transported to Get With The Guidelines—Stroke hospitals it is not provided for 1 in 3 EMS‐arriving patients with acute ischemic stroke and varies substantially by hospital, state, and region. These results support the need for enhanced implementation of stroke systems of care. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e002345 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.002345.) Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3487363/ /pubmed/23130167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.002345 Text en © 2012 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley-Blackwell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lin, Cheryl B.
Peterson, Eric D.
Smith, Eric E.
Saver, Jeffrey L.
Liang, Li
Xian, Ying
Olson, DaiWai M.
Shah, Bimal R.
Hernandez, Adrian F.
Schwamm, Lee H.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title_full Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title_fullStr Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title_short Patterns, Predictors, Variations, and Temporal Trends in Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title_sort patterns, predictors, variations, and temporal trends in emergency medical service hospital prenotification for acute ischemic stroke
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.002345
work_keys_str_mv AT lincherylb patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke
AT petersonericd patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke
AT smitherice patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke
AT saverjeffreyl patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke
AT liangli patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke
AT xianying patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke
AT olsondaiwaim patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke
AT shahbimalr patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke
AT hernandezadrianf patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke
AT schwammleeh patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke
AT fonarowgreggc patternspredictorsvariationsandtemporaltrendsinemergencymedicalservicehospitalprenotificationforacuteischemicstroke