Cargando…

Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α Agonism With Fenofibrate Does Not Suppress Inflammatory Responses to Evoked Endotoxemia

BACKGROUND: Data conflict with regard to whether peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-α agonism suppresses inflammation in humans. We hypothesized that in healthy adults peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-α agonism with fenofibrate would blunt the induced immune responses to endotoxin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulvey, Claire K., Ferguson, Jane F., Tabita-Martinez, Jennifer, Kong, Stephanie, Shah, Rhia Y., Patel, Parth N., Master, Stephen R., Usman, M Haris U., Propert, Kathleen J., Shah, Rachana, Mehta, Nehal N., Reilly, Muredach P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.002923
_version_ 1782248475742699520
author Mulvey, Claire K.
Ferguson, Jane F.
Tabita-Martinez, Jennifer
Kong, Stephanie
Shah, Rhia Y.
Patel, Parth N.
Master, Stephen R.
Usman, M Haris U.
Propert, Kathleen J.
Shah, Rachana
Mehta, Nehal N.
Reilly, Muredach P.
author_facet Mulvey, Claire K.
Ferguson, Jane F.
Tabita-Martinez, Jennifer
Kong, Stephanie
Shah, Rhia Y.
Patel, Parth N.
Master, Stephen R.
Usman, M Haris U.
Propert, Kathleen J.
Shah, Rachana
Mehta, Nehal N.
Reilly, Muredach P.
author_sort Mulvey, Claire K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data conflict with regard to whether peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-α agonism suppresses inflammation in humans. We hypothesized that in healthy adults peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-α agonism with fenofibrate would blunt the induced immune responses to endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]), an in vivo model for the study of cardiometabolic inflammation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Fenofibrate and omega-3 Fatty Acid Modulation of Endotoxemia (FFAME) trial, 36 healthy volunteers (mean age 26±7 years, mean body mass index 24±3 kg/m(2), 44% female, 72% white) were randomized to fenofibrate 145 mg or placebo daily. After 6 to 8 weeks of treatment, subjects underwent a low-dose LPS challenge. Clinical and blood measurements were collected at randomization, before LPS administration, and serially for 24 hours after LPS administration. We examined area under the curve for evoked responses by treatment group. Compared to placebo, but before LPS challenge, fenofibrate reduced total cholesterol and tended to decrease triglycerides, consistent with achieved therapeutic plasma levels of fenofibric acid. In the placebo group, LPS induced a modest inflammatory response with increased cytokines and chemokines (2- to 4-hour post-LPS 8-fold increase in tumor necrosis factor-α, 9-fold increase in interleukin-6, 9-fold increase in interleukin-10, and 10-fold increase in monocyte chemotactic protein-1; all P<0.001) and acute-phase reactants (24-hour post-LPS 15-fold increase in serum amyloid A and 9-fold increase in C-reactive protein; both P<0.001). Compared to placebo, however, fenofibrate did not significantly attenuate LPS-induced levels of plasma cytokines, chemokines, or acute-phase proteins. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a lack of systemic antiinflammatory properties of fenofibrate at clinically relevant dosing in humans. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01048502. Unique identifier: NCT01048502. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e002923 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.002923.)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3487364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34873642012-11-03 Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α Agonism With Fenofibrate Does Not Suppress Inflammatory Responses to Evoked Endotoxemia Mulvey, Claire K. Ferguson, Jane F. Tabita-Martinez, Jennifer Kong, Stephanie Shah, Rhia Y. Patel, Parth N. Master, Stephen R. Usman, M Haris U. Propert, Kathleen J. Shah, Rachana Mehta, Nehal N. Reilly, Muredach P. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Data conflict with regard to whether peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-α agonism suppresses inflammation in humans. We hypothesized that in healthy adults peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-α agonism with fenofibrate would blunt the induced immune responses to endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]), an in vivo model for the study of cardiometabolic inflammation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Fenofibrate and omega-3 Fatty Acid Modulation of Endotoxemia (FFAME) trial, 36 healthy volunteers (mean age 26±7 years, mean body mass index 24±3 kg/m(2), 44% female, 72% white) were randomized to fenofibrate 145 mg or placebo daily. After 6 to 8 weeks of treatment, subjects underwent a low-dose LPS challenge. Clinical and blood measurements were collected at randomization, before LPS administration, and serially for 24 hours after LPS administration. We examined area under the curve for evoked responses by treatment group. Compared to placebo, but before LPS challenge, fenofibrate reduced total cholesterol and tended to decrease triglycerides, consistent with achieved therapeutic plasma levels of fenofibric acid. In the placebo group, LPS induced a modest inflammatory response with increased cytokines and chemokines (2- to 4-hour post-LPS 8-fold increase in tumor necrosis factor-α, 9-fold increase in interleukin-6, 9-fold increase in interleukin-10, and 10-fold increase in monocyte chemotactic protein-1; all P<0.001) and acute-phase reactants (24-hour post-LPS 15-fold increase in serum amyloid A and 9-fold increase in C-reactive protein; both P<0.001). Compared to placebo, however, fenofibrate did not significantly attenuate LPS-induced levels of plasma cytokines, chemokines, or acute-phase proteins. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a lack of systemic antiinflammatory properties of fenofibrate at clinically relevant dosing in humans. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01048502. Unique identifier: NCT01048502. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e002923 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.002923.) Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3487364/ /pubmed/23130172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.002923 Text en © 2012 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley-Blackwell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mulvey, Claire K.
Ferguson, Jane F.
Tabita-Martinez, Jennifer
Kong, Stephanie
Shah, Rhia Y.
Patel, Parth N.
Master, Stephen R.
Usman, M Haris U.
Propert, Kathleen J.
Shah, Rachana
Mehta, Nehal N.
Reilly, Muredach P.
Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α Agonism With Fenofibrate Does Not Suppress Inflammatory Responses to Evoked Endotoxemia
title Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α Agonism With Fenofibrate Does Not Suppress Inflammatory Responses to Evoked Endotoxemia
title_full Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α Agonism With Fenofibrate Does Not Suppress Inflammatory Responses to Evoked Endotoxemia
title_fullStr Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α Agonism With Fenofibrate Does Not Suppress Inflammatory Responses to Evoked Endotoxemia
title_full_unstemmed Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α Agonism With Fenofibrate Does Not Suppress Inflammatory Responses to Evoked Endotoxemia
title_short Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α Agonism With Fenofibrate Does Not Suppress Inflammatory Responses to Evoked Endotoxemia
title_sort peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-α agonism with fenofibrate does not suppress inflammatory responses to evoked endotoxemia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.002923
work_keys_str_mv AT mulveyclairek peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT fergusonjanef peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT tabitamartinezjennifer peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT kongstephanie peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT shahrhiay peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT patelparthn peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT masterstephenr peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT usmanmharisu peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT propertkathleenj peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT shahrachana peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT mehtanehaln peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia
AT reillymuredachp peroxisomeproliferatoractivatedreceptoraagonismwithfenofibratedoesnotsuppressinflammatoryresponsestoevokedendotoxemia