Cargando…

In Vitro Comparison of Dye Penetration through Four Temporary Restorative Materials

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the coronal seal of four temporary filling materials, Coltosol, Zonalin, Zamherir, and Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM) by the India ink dye penetration test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endodontic access preparations were prepared in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahi, Shahriar, Samiei, Mohammad, Rahimi, Saeed, Nezami, Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130028
_version_ 1782248486739116032
author Shahi, Shahriar
Samiei, Mohammad
Rahimi, Saeed
Nezami, Hossein
author_facet Shahi, Shahriar
Samiei, Mohammad
Rahimi, Saeed
Nezami, Hossein
author_sort Shahi, Shahriar
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the coronal seal of four temporary filling materials, Coltosol, Zonalin, Zamherir, and Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM) by the India ink dye penetration test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endodontic access preparations were prepared in 120 extracted intact human premolars. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups including four experimental and two control groups. The access cavities in each group were sealed with Coltosol, Zonalin, Zamherir, and IRM; subsequently thermocycling was applied for 5-55˚C for 150 cycles. The teeth were immersed in 10% India ink for 72 hours to assess leakage. The teeth were then rinsed, dried, and sectioned mesiodistally and evaluated under a stereomicroscope for dye penetration. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests. RESULTS: Positive control specimens showed complete dye penetration, while negative controls had no penetration. In the experimental groups, the lowest and highest leakage scores were observed in the Zonalin and Coltosol groups, respectively (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in marginal leakage between Zonalin-Zamherir and Coltosol-IRM groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that Zonalin and Zamherir have a superior seal and less micro-leakage into the canals compared to the two other materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3487503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34875032012-11-05 In Vitro Comparison of Dye Penetration through Four Temporary Restorative Materials Shahi, Shahriar Samiei, Mohammad Rahimi, Saeed Nezami, Hossein Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the coronal seal of four temporary filling materials, Coltosol, Zonalin, Zamherir, and Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM) by the India ink dye penetration test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endodontic access preparations were prepared in 120 extracted intact human premolars. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups including four experimental and two control groups. The access cavities in each group were sealed with Coltosol, Zonalin, Zamherir, and IRM; subsequently thermocycling was applied for 5-55˚C for 150 cycles. The teeth were immersed in 10% India ink for 72 hours to assess leakage. The teeth were then rinsed, dried, and sectioned mesiodistally and evaluated under a stereomicroscope for dye penetration. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests. RESULTS: Positive control specimens showed complete dye penetration, while negative controls had no penetration. In the experimental groups, the lowest and highest leakage scores were observed in the Zonalin and Coltosol groups, respectively (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in marginal leakage between Zonalin-Zamherir and Coltosol-IRM groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that Zonalin and Zamherir have a superior seal and less micro-leakage into the canals compared to the two other materials. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2010 2010-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3487503/ /pubmed/23130028 Text en Copyright © Iranian Endodontic Journal, 2010. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shahi, Shahriar
Samiei, Mohammad
Rahimi, Saeed
Nezami, Hossein
In Vitro Comparison of Dye Penetration through Four Temporary Restorative Materials
title In Vitro Comparison of Dye Penetration through Four Temporary Restorative Materials
title_full In Vitro Comparison of Dye Penetration through Four Temporary Restorative Materials
title_fullStr In Vitro Comparison of Dye Penetration through Four Temporary Restorative Materials
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Comparison of Dye Penetration through Four Temporary Restorative Materials
title_short In Vitro Comparison of Dye Penetration through Four Temporary Restorative Materials
title_sort in vitro comparison of dye penetration through four temporary restorative materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130028
work_keys_str_mv AT shahishahriar invitrocomparisonofdyepenetrationthroughfourtemporaryrestorativematerials
AT samieimohammad invitrocomparisonofdyepenetrationthroughfourtemporaryrestorativematerials
AT rahimisaeed invitrocomparisonofdyepenetrationthroughfourtemporaryrestorativematerials
AT nezamihossein invitrocomparisonofdyepenetrationthroughfourtemporaryrestorativematerials