Cargando…

A Comparative In Vivo Study of Tissue Reactions to Four Suturing Materials

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the histopathologic reaction of four suturing materials: silk, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyglycolic acid, and catgut in the oral mucosa of albino rabbits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The twenty-one male mature albino rabbits which were used i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kakoei, Shahla, Baghaei, Fahimeh, Dabiri, Shahriar, Parirokh, Masoud, Kakooei, Sina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130030
_version_ 1782248487244529664
author Kakoei, Shahla
Baghaei, Fahimeh
Dabiri, Shahriar
Parirokh, Masoud
Kakooei, Sina
author_facet Kakoei, Shahla
Baghaei, Fahimeh
Dabiri, Shahriar
Parirokh, Masoud
Kakooei, Sina
author_sort Kakoei, Shahla
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the histopathologic reaction of four suturing materials: silk, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyglycolic acid, and catgut in the oral mucosa of albino rabbits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The twenty-one male mature albino rabbits which were used in this study were randomly divided into three groups of seven each. Silk, PVDF, polyglycolic acid and catgut suture materials were tested in the oral mucosa of these animals. The animals were sacrificed 2, 4, and 7 days after suturing. Two pathologists evaluated the samples by determining the presence and level of inflammation, granulation tissue, and fibrosis formation. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Histological features of the samples showed that PVDF and plain catgut suture materials produced more fibrous tissue (favorable response) on the fourth day in comparison with silk suture (P=0.02). Also, in the 7-day samples PVDF sutures produced the mildest inflammation when compared with the silk sutures (P=0.015). CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, it can be convey that PVDF suture materials created mild tissue reactions and can be a reasonable candidate for suturing oral tissues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3487505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34875052012-11-05 A Comparative In Vivo Study of Tissue Reactions to Four Suturing Materials Kakoei, Shahla Baghaei, Fahimeh Dabiri, Shahriar Parirokh, Masoud Kakooei, Sina Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the histopathologic reaction of four suturing materials: silk, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyglycolic acid, and catgut in the oral mucosa of albino rabbits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The twenty-one male mature albino rabbits which were used in this study were randomly divided into three groups of seven each. Silk, PVDF, polyglycolic acid and catgut suture materials were tested in the oral mucosa of these animals. The animals were sacrificed 2, 4, and 7 days after suturing. Two pathologists evaluated the samples by determining the presence and level of inflammation, granulation tissue, and fibrosis formation. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Histological features of the samples showed that PVDF and plain catgut suture materials produced more fibrous tissue (favorable response) on the fourth day in comparison with silk suture (P=0.02). Also, in the 7-day samples PVDF sutures produced the mildest inflammation when compared with the silk sutures (P=0.015). CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, it can be convey that PVDF suture materials created mild tissue reactions and can be a reasonable candidate for suturing oral tissues. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2010 2010-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3487505/ /pubmed/23130030 Text en Copyright © Iranian Endodontic Journal, 2010. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kakoei, Shahla
Baghaei, Fahimeh
Dabiri, Shahriar
Parirokh, Masoud
Kakooei, Sina
A Comparative In Vivo Study of Tissue Reactions to Four Suturing Materials
title A Comparative In Vivo Study of Tissue Reactions to Four Suturing Materials
title_full A Comparative In Vivo Study of Tissue Reactions to Four Suturing Materials
title_fullStr A Comparative In Vivo Study of Tissue Reactions to Four Suturing Materials
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative In Vivo Study of Tissue Reactions to Four Suturing Materials
title_short A Comparative In Vivo Study of Tissue Reactions to Four Suturing Materials
title_sort comparative in vivo study of tissue reactions to four suturing materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23130030
work_keys_str_mv AT kakoeishahla acomparativeinvivostudyoftissuereactionstofoursuturingmaterials
AT baghaeifahimeh acomparativeinvivostudyoftissuereactionstofoursuturingmaterials
AT dabirishahriar acomparativeinvivostudyoftissuereactionstofoursuturingmaterials
AT parirokhmasoud acomparativeinvivostudyoftissuereactionstofoursuturingmaterials
AT kakooeisina acomparativeinvivostudyoftissuereactionstofoursuturingmaterials
AT kakoeishahla comparativeinvivostudyoftissuereactionstofoursuturingmaterials
AT baghaeifahimeh comparativeinvivostudyoftissuereactionstofoursuturingmaterials
AT dabirishahriar comparativeinvivostudyoftissuereactionstofoursuturingmaterials
AT parirokhmasoud comparativeinvivostudyoftissuereactionstofoursuturingmaterials
AT kakooeisina comparativeinvivostudyoftissuereactionstofoursuturingmaterials