Cargando…

The health and cost implications of high body mass index in Australian defence force personnel

BACKGROUND: Frequent illness and injury among workers with high body mass index (BMI) can raise the costs of employee healthcare and reduce workforce maintenance and productivity. These issues are particularly important in vocational settings such as the military, which require good physical health,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peake, Jonathan, Gargett, Susan, Waller, Michael, McLaughlin, Ruth, Cosgrove, Tegan, Wittert, Gary, Nasveld, Peter, Warfe, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22716068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-451
_version_ 1782248510832246784
author Peake, Jonathan
Gargett, Susan
Waller, Michael
McLaughlin, Ruth
Cosgrove, Tegan
Wittert, Gary
Nasveld, Peter
Warfe, Peter
author_facet Peake, Jonathan
Gargett, Susan
Waller, Michael
McLaughlin, Ruth
Cosgrove, Tegan
Wittert, Gary
Nasveld, Peter
Warfe, Peter
author_sort Peake, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frequent illness and injury among workers with high body mass index (BMI) can raise the costs of employee healthcare and reduce workforce maintenance and productivity. These issues are particularly important in vocational settings such as the military, which require good physical health, regular attendance and teamwork to operate efficiently. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of injury and illness, absenteeism, productivity, healthcare usage and administrative outcomes among Australian Defence Force personnel with varying BMI. METHODS: Personnel were grouped into cohorts according to the following ranges for (BMI): normal (18.5 − 24.9 kg/m(2); n = 197), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m(2); n = 154) and obese (≥30 kg/m(2)) with restricted body fat (≤28% for females, ≤24% for males) (n = 148) and with no restriction on body fat (n = 180). Medical records for each individual were audited retrospectively to record the incidence of injury and illness, absenteeism, productivity, healthcare usage (i.e., consultation with medical specialists, hospital stays, medical investigations, prescriptions) and administrative outcomes (e.g., discharge from service) over one year. These data were then grouped and compared between the cohorts. RESULTS: The prevalence of injury and illness, cost of medical specialist consultations and cost of medical scans were all higher (p < 0.05) in both obese cohorts compared with the normal cohort. The estimated productivity losses from restricted work days were also higher (p < 0.05) in the obese cohort with no restriction on body fat compared with the normal cohort. Within the obese cohort, the prevalence of injury and illness, healthcare usage and productivity were not significantly greater in the obese cohort with no restriction on body fat compared with the cohort with restricted body fat. The number of restricted work days, the rate of re-classification of Medical Employment Classification and the rate of discharge from service were similar between all four cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: High BMI in the military increases healthcare usage, but does not disrupt workforce maintenance. The greater prevalence of injury and illness, greater healthcare usage and lower productivity in obese Australian Defence Force personnel is not related to higher levels of body fat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3487768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34877682012-11-03 The health and cost implications of high body mass index in Australian defence force personnel Peake, Jonathan Gargett, Susan Waller, Michael McLaughlin, Ruth Cosgrove, Tegan Wittert, Gary Nasveld, Peter Warfe, Peter BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Frequent illness and injury among workers with high body mass index (BMI) can raise the costs of employee healthcare and reduce workforce maintenance and productivity. These issues are particularly important in vocational settings such as the military, which require good physical health, regular attendance and teamwork to operate efficiently. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of injury and illness, absenteeism, productivity, healthcare usage and administrative outcomes among Australian Defence Force personnel with varying BMI. METHODS: Personnel were grouped into cohorts according to the following ranges for (BMI): normal (18.5 − 24.9 kg/m(2); n = 197), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m(2); n = 154) and obese (≥30 kg/m(2)) with restricted body fat (≤28% for females, ≤24% for males) (n = 148) and with no restriction on body fat (n = 180). Medical records for each individual were audited retrospectively to record the incidence of injury and illness, absenteeism, productivity, healthcare usage (i.e., consultation with medical specialists, hospital stays, medical investigations, prescriptions) and administrative outcomes (e.g., discharge from service) over one year. These data were then grouped and compared between the cohorts. RESULTS: The prevalence of injury and illness, cost of medical specialist consultations and cost of medical scans were all higher (p < 0.05) in both obese cohorts compared with the normal cohort. The estimated productivity losses from restricted work days were also higher (p < 0.05) in the obese cohort with no restriction on body fat compared with the normal cohort. Within the obese cohort, the prevalence of injury and illness, healthcare usage and productivity were not significantly greater in the obese cohort with no restriction on body fat compared with the cohort with restricted body fat. The number of restricted work days, the rate of re-classification of Medical Employment Classification and the rate of discharge from service were similar between all four cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: High BMI in the military increases healthcare usage, but does not disrupt workforce maintenance. The greater prevalence of injury and illness, greater healthcare usage and lower productivity in obese Australian Defence Force personnel is not related to higher levels of body fat. BioMed Central 2012-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3487768/ /pubmed/22716068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-451 Text en Copyright ©2012 Peake et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peake, Jonathan
Gargett, Susan
Waller, Michael
McLaughlin, Ruth
Cosgrove, Tegan
Wittert, Gary
Nasveld, Peter
Warfe, Peter
The health and cost implications of high body mass index in Australian defence force personnel
title The health and cost implications of high body mass index in Australian defence force personnel
title_full The health and cost implications of high body mass index in Australian defence force personnel
title_fullStr The health and cost implications of high body mass index in Australian defence force personnel
title_full_unstemmed The health and cost implications of high body mass index in Australian defence force personnel
title_short The health and cost implications of high body mass index in Australian defence force personnel
title_sort health and cost implications of high body mass index in australian defence force personnel
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22716068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-451
work_keys_str_mv AT peakejonathan thehealthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT gargettsusan thehealthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT wallermichael thehealthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT mclaughlinruth thehealthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT cosgrovetegan thehealthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT wittertgary thehealthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT nasveldpeter thehealthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT warfepeter thehealthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT peakejonathan healthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT gargettsusan healthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT wallermichael healthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT mclaughlinruth healthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT cosgrovetegan healthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT wittertgary healthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT nasveldpeter healthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel
AT warfepeter healthandcostimplicationsofhighbodymassindexinaustraliandefenceforcepersonnel