Cargando…
Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation
The use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in disease surveys and reporting is becoming increasingly routine, enabling a better understanding of spatial epidemiology and the improvement of surveillance and control strategies. In turn, the greater availabil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-10-8 |
_version_ | 1782248513440055296 |
---|---|
author | Tatem, Andrew J Adamo, Susana Bharti, Nita Burgert, Clara R Castro, Marcia Dorelien, Audrey Fink, Gunter Linard, Catherine John, Mendelsohn Montana, Livia Montgomery, Mark R Nelson, Andrew Noor, Abdisalan M Pindolia, Deepa Yetman, Greg Balk, Deborah |
author_facet | Tatem, Andrew J Adamo, Susana Bharti, Nita Burgert, Clara R Castro, Marcia Dorelien, Audrey Fink, Gunter Linard, Catherine John, Mendelsohn Montana, Livia Montgomery, Mark R Nelson, Andrew Noor, Abdisalan M Pindolia, Deepa Yetman, Greg Balk, Deborah |
author_sort | Tatem, Andrew J |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in disease surveys and reporting is becoming increasingly routine, enabling a better understanding of spatial epidemiology and the improvement of surveillance and control strategies. In turn, the greater availability of spatially referenced epidemiological data is driving the rapid expansion of disease mapping and spatial modeling methods, which are becoming increasingly detailed and sophisticated, with rigorous handling of uncertainties. This expansion has, however, not been matched by advancements in the development of spatial datasets of human population distribution that accompany disease maps or spatial models. Where risks are heterogeneous across population groups or space or dependent on transmission between individuals, spatial data on human population distributions and demographic structures are required to estimate infectious disease risks, burdens, and dynamics. The disease impact in terms of morbidity, mortality, and speed of spread varies substantially with demographic profiles, so that identifying the most exposed or affected populations becomes a key aspect of planning and targeting interventions. Subnational breakdowns of population counts by age and sex are routinely collected during national censuses and maintained in finer detail within microcensus data. Moreover, demographic and health surveys continue to collect representative and contemporary samples from clusters of communities in low-income countries where census data may be less detailed and not collected regularly. Together, these freely available datasets form a rich resource for quantifying and understanding the spatial variations in the sizes and distributions of those most at risk of disease in low income regions, yet at present, they remain unconnected data scattered across national statistical offices and websites. In this paper we discuss the deficiencies of existing spatial population datasets and their limitations on epidemiological analyses. We review sources of detailed, contemporary, freely available and relevant spatial demographic data focusing on low income regions where such data are often sparse and highlight the value of incorporating these through a set of examples of their application in disease studies. Moreover, the importance of acknowledging, measuring, and accounting for uncertainty in spatial demographic datasets is outlined. Finally, a strategy for building an open-access database of spatial demographic data that is tailored to epidemiological applications is put forward. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3487779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34877792012-11-03 Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation Tatem, Andrew J Adamo, Susana Bharti, Nita Burgert, Clara R Castro, Marcia Dorelien, Audrey Fink, Gunter Linard, Catherine John, Mendelsohn Montana, Livia Montgomery, Mark R Nelson, Andrew Noor, Abdisalan M Pindolia, Deepa Yetman, Greg Balk, Deborah Popul Health Metr Review The use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in disease surveys and reporting is becoming increasingly routine, enabling a better understanding of spatial epidemiology and the improvement of surveillance and control strategies. In turn, the greater availability of spatially referenced epidemiological data is driving the rapid expansion of disease mapping and spatial modeling methods, which are becoming increasingly detailed and sophisticated, with rigorous handling of uncertainties. This expansion has, however, not been matched by advancements in the development of spatial datasets of human population distribution that accompany disease maps or spatial models. Where risks are heterogeneous across population groups or space or dependent on transmission between individuals, spatial data on human population distributions and demographic structures are required to estimate infectious disease risks, burdens, and dynamics. The disease impact in terms of morbidity, mortality, and speed of spread varies substantially with demographic profiles, so that identifying the most exposed or affected populations becomes a key aspect of planning and targeting interventions. Subnational breakdowns of population counts by age and sex are routinely collected during national censuses and maintained in finer detail within microcensus data. Moreover, demographic and health surveys continue to collect representative and contemporary samples from clusters of communities in low-income countries where census data may be less detailed and not collected regularly. Together, these freely available datasets form a rich resource for quantifying and understanding the spatial variations in the sizes and distributions of those most at risk of disease in low income regions, yet at present, they remain unconnected data scattered across national statistical offices and websites. In this paper we discuss the deficiencies of existing spatial population datasets and their limitations on epidemiological analyses. We review sources of detailed, contemporary, freely available and relevant spatial demographic data focusing on low income regions where such data are often sparse and highlight the value of incorporating these through a set of examples of their application in disease studies. Moreover, the importance of acknowledging, measuring, and accounting for uncertainty in spatial demographic datasets is outlined. Finally, a strategy for building an open-access database of spatial demographic data that is tailored to epidemiological applications is put forward. BioMed Central 2012-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3487779/ /pubmed/22591595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-10-8 Text en Copyright ©2012 Tatem et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 .This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Tatem, Andrew J Adamo, Susana Bharti, Nita Burgert, Clara R Castro, Marcia Dorelien, Audrey Fink, Gunter Linard, Catherine John, Mendelsohn Montana, Livia Montgomery, Mark R Nelson, Andrew Noor, Abdisalan M Pindolia, Deepa Yetman, Greg Balk, Deborah Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation |
title | Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation |
title_full | Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation |
title_fullStr | Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation |
title_full_unstemmed | Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation |
title_short | Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation |
title_sort | mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-10-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tatemandrewj mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT adamosusana mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT bhartinita mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT burgertclarar mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT castromarcia mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT dorelienaudrey mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT finkgunter mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT linardcatherine mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT johnmendelsohn mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT montanalivia mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT montgomerymarkr mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT nelsonandrew mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT noorabdisalanm mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT pindoliadeepa mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT yetmangreg mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation AT balkdeborah mappingpopulationsatriskimprovingspatialdemographicdataforinfectiousdiseasemodelingandmetricderivation |