Cargando…
Economic benefit of subcutaneous rapid push versus intravenous immunoglobulin infusion therapy in adult patients with primary immune deficiency
Autores principales: | Martin, Adriana, Lavoie, Louis, Goetghebeur, Mireille, Schellenberg, Robert |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487819/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1710-1492-8-S1-A20 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Economic benefits of subcutaneous rapid push versus intravenous immunoglobulin infusion therapy in adult patients with primary immune deficiency
por: Martin, A, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Evaluation of safety and efficacy of a 20% Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (Hizentra™), after a dose equivalent switch from intravenous or subcutaneous replacement therapy in a cohort of primary immunodeficient patients
por: Martin, Adriana, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Delivery of subcutaneous immunoglobulin by rapid “push” infusion for primary immunodeficiency patients in Manitoba: a retrospective review
por: Walter, Graham, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Rapid Push vs Pump-Infused Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Treatment: a Randomized Crossover Study of Quality of Life in Primary Immunodeficiency Patients
por: Bienvenu, Boris, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
A pilot study of quality of life, mood, sleepiness and fatigue in patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency transitioning to subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy
por: Pourshahnazari, Persia, et al.
Publicado: (2014)