Cargando…

The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been shown to have an effect on spine-related pain, both clinically and in experimentally induced pain. However, it is unclear if it has an immediate noticeable biomechanical effect on spinal motion that can be measured in terms of an increased range...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Millan, Mario, Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte, Budgell, Brian, Descarreaux, Martin, Amorim, Michel-Ange
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22866816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-20-23
_version_ 1782248542887215104
author Millan, Mario
Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte
Budgell, Brian
Descarreaux, Martin
Amorim, Michel-Ange
author_facet Millan, Mario
Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte
Budgell, Brian
Descarreaux, Martin
Amorim, Michel-Ange
author_sort Millan, Mario
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been shown to have an effect on spine-related pain, both clinically and in experimentally induced pain. However, it is unclear if it has an immediate noticeable biomechanical effect on spinal motion that can be measured in terms of an increased range of motion (ROM). OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of the literature and to determine whether or not SMT is associated with an immediate increase in ROM. DESIGN: A systematic critical literature review. METHOD: Systematic searches were performed in Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE using terms relating to manipulation, movement and the spine. Selection of articles was made according to specific criteria by two independent reviewers. Two checklists were created based on the needs of the present review. Articles were independently reviewed by two reviewers. Articles were given quality scores and the data synthesized for each region treated in the literature. Findings were summarized in tables and reported in a narrative fashion. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were retained reporting on experiments on the neck, lumbar spine, hip and jaw. The mean quality score was 71/100 (ranges 33/100 - 92/100). A positive effect of SMT was reported in both studies where mouth opening was assessed after cervical manipulation. In five of the nine studies on cervical ROM a positive effect was reported, whereas the remaining four studies did not show improvement. None of the three studies of the lumbar spine showed an effect of SMT on lumbar ROMs and one study of sacroiliac manipulation reported no effect on the ROM of the hip joint. In relation to the quality score, the seven highest ranked studies, showed significant positive effects of SMT on ROM. Continuing down the list, the other studies reported no significant differences in the outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: SMT seems sometimes to have a small effect on ROM, at least in the cervical spine. Further research should concentrate on areas of the spine that have the potential of actually improving to such a degree that a change can be easily uncovered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3487906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34879062012-11-03 The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review Millan, Mario Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte Budgell, Brian Descarreaux, Martin Amorim, Michel-Ange Chiropr Man Therap Review BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been shown to have an effect on spine-related pain, both clinically and in experimentally induced pain. However, it is unclear if it has an immediate noticeable biomechanical effect on spinal motion that can be measured in terms of an increased range of motion (ROM). OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of the literature and to determine whether or not SMT is associated with an immediate increase in ROM. DESIGN: A systematic critical literature review. METHOD: Systematic searches were performed in Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE using terms relating to manipulation, movement and the spine. Selection of articles was made according to specific criteria by two independent reviewers. Two checklists were created based on the needs of the present review. Articles were independently reviewed by two reviewers. Articles were given quality scores and the data synthesized for each region treated in the literature. Findings were summarized in tables and reported in a narrative fashion. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were retained reporting on experiments on the neck, lumbar spine, hip and jaw. The mean quality score was 71/100 (ranges 33/100 - 92/100). A positive effect of SMT was reported in both studies where mouth opening was assessed after cervical manipulation. In five of the nine studies on cervical ROM a positive effect was reported, whereas the remaining four studies did not show improvement. None of the three studies of the lumbar spine showed an effect of SMT on lumbar ROMs and one study of sacroiliac manipulation reported no effect on the ROM of the hip joint. In relation to the quality score, the seven highest ranked studies, showed significant positive effects of SMT on ROM. Continuing down the list, the other studies reported no significant differences in the outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: SMT seems sometimes to have a small effect on ROM, at least in the cervical spine. Further research should concentrate on areas of the spine that have the potential of actually improving to such a degree that a change can be easily uncovered. BioMed Central 2012-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3487906/ /pubmed/22866816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-20-23 Text en Copyright © 2012 Millan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Millan, Mario
Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte
Budgell, Brian
Descarreaux, Martin
Amorim, Michel-Ange
The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review
title The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review
title_full The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review
title_short The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review
title_sort effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22866816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-20-23
work_keys_str_mv AT millanmario theeffectofspinalmanipulativetherapyonspinalrangeofmotionasystematicliteraturereview
AT leboeufydecharlotte theeffectofspinalmanipulativetherapyonspinalrangeofmotionasystematicliteraturereview
AT budgellbrian theeffectofspinalmanipulativetherapyonspinalrangeofmotionasystematicliteraturereview
AT descarreauxmartin theeffectofspinalmanipulativetherapyonspinalrangeofmotionasystematicliteraturereview
AT amorimmichelange theeffectofspinalmanipulativetherapyonspinalrangeofmotionasystematicliteraturereview
AT millanmario effectofspinalmanipulativetherapyonspinalrangeofmotionasystematicliteraturereview
AT leboeufydecharlotte effectofspinalmanipulativetherapyonspinalrangeofmotionasystematicliteraturereview
AT budgellbrian effectofspinalmanipulativetherapyonspinalrangeofmotionasystematicliteraturereview
AT descarreauxmartin effectofspinalmanipulativetherapyonspinalrangeofmotionasystematicliteraturereview
AT amorimmichelange effectofspinalmanipulativetherapyonspinalrangeofmotionasystematicliteraturereview