Cargando…
Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT
BACKGROUND: Due to the substantial increase in beam-on time of high energy intensity-modulated radiotherapy (>10 MV) techniques to deliver the same target dose compared to conventional treatment techniques, an increased dose of scatter radiation, including neutrons, is delivered to the patient. A...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22883384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-138 |
_version_ | 1782248560797941760 |
---|---|
author | Hälg, Roger A Besserer, Jürgen Boschung, Markus Mayer, Sabine Schneider, Uwe |
author_facet | Hälg, Roger A Besserer, Jürgen Boschung, Markus Mayer, Sabine Schneider, Uwe |
author_sort | Hälg, Roger A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Due to the substantial increase in beam-on time of high energy intensity-modulated radiotherapy (>10 MV) techniques to deliver the same target dose compared to conventional treatment techniques, an increased dose of scatter radiation, including neutrons, is delivered to the patient. As a consequence, an increase in second malignancies may be expected in the future with the application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. It is commonly assumed that the neutron dose equivalent scales with the number of monitor units. METHODS: Measurements of neutron dose equivalent were performed for an open and an intensity-modulated field at four positions: inside and outside of the treatment field at 0.2 cm and 15 cm depth, respectively. RESULTS: It was shown that the neutron dose equivalent, which a patient receives during an intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment, does not scale with the ratio of applied monitor units relative to an open field irradiation. Outside the treatment volume at larger depth 35% less neutron dose equivalent is delivered than expected. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted increase of second cancer induction rates from intensity-modulated treatment techniques can be overestimated when the neutron dose is simply scaled with monitor units. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3487990 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34879902012-11-03 Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT Hälg, Roger A Besserer, Jürgen Boschung, Markus Mayer, Sabine Schneider, Uwe Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Due to the substantial increase in beam-on time of high energy intensity-modulated radiotherapy (>10 MV) techniques to deliver the same target dose compared to conventional treatment techniques, an increased dose of scatter radiation, including neutrons, is delivered to the patient. As a consequence, an increase in second malignancies may be expected in the future with the application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. It is commonly assumed that the neutron dose equivalent scales with the number of monitor units. METHODS: Measurements of neutron dose equivalent were performed for an open and an intensity-modulated field at four positions: inside and outside of the treatment field at 0.2 cm and 15 cm depth, respectively. RESULTS: It was shown that the neutron dose equivalent, which a patient receives during an intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment, does not scale with the ratio of applied monitor units relative to an open field irradiation. Outside the treatment volume at larger depth 35% less neutron dose equivalent is delivered than expected. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted increase of second cancer induction rates from intensity-modulated treatment techniques can be overestimated when the neutron dose is simply scaled with monitor units. BioMed Central 2012-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3487990/ /pubmed/22883384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-138 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hälg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Hälg, Roger A Besserer, Jürgen Boschung, Markus Mayer, Sabine Schneider, Uwe Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT |
title | Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT |
title_full | Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT |
title_fullStr | Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT |
title_short | Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT |
title_sort | monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy imrt |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22883384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halgrogera monitorunitsarenotpredictiveofneutrondoseforhighenergyimrt AT bessererjurgen monitorunitsarenotpredictiveofneutrondoseforhighenergyimrt AT boschungmarkus monitorunitsarenotpredictiveofneutrondoseforhighenergyimrt AT mayersabine monitorunitsarenotpredictiveofneutrondoseforhighenergyimrt AT schneideruwe monitorunitsarenotpredictiveofneutrondoseforhighenergyimrt |