Cargando…

Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT

BACKGROUND: Due to the substantial increase in beam-on time of high energy intensity-modulated radiotherapy (>10 MV) techniques to deliver the same target dose compared to conventional treatment techniques, an increased dose of scatter radiation, including neutrons, is delivered to the patient. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hälg, Roger A, Besserer, Jürgen, Boschung, Markus, Mayer, Sabine, Schneider, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22883384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-138
_version_ 1782248560797941760
author Hälg, Roger A
Besserer, Jürgen
Boschung, Markus
Mayer, Sabine
Schneider, Uwe
author_facet Hälg, Roger A
Besserer, Jürgen
Boschung, Markus
Mayer, Sabine
Schneider, Uwe
author_sort Hälg, Roger A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to the substantial increase in beam-on time of high energy intensity-modulated radiotherapy (>10 MV) techniques to deliver the same target dose compared to conventional treatment techniques, an increased dose of scatter radiation, including neutrons, is delivered to the patient. As a consequence, an increase in second malignancies may be expected in the future with the application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. It is commonly assumed that the neutron dose equivalent scales with the number of monitor units. METHODS: Measurements of neutron dose equivalent were performed for an open and an intensity-modulated field at four positions: inside and outside of the treatment field at 0.2 cm and 15 cm depth, respectively. RESULTS: It was shown that the neutron dose equivalent, which a patient receives during an intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment, does not scale with the ratio of applied monitor units relative to an open field irradiation. Outside the treatment volume at larger depth 35% less neutron dose equivalent is delivered than expected. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted increase of second cancer induction rates from intensity-modulated treatment techniques can be overestimated when the neutron dose is simply scaled with monitor units.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3487990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34879902012-11-03 Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT Hälg, Roger A Besserer, Jürgen Boschung, Markus Mayer, Sabine Schneider, Uwe Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Due to the substantial increase in beam-on time of high energy intensity-modulated radiotherapy (>10 MV) techniques to deliver the same target dose compared to conventional treatment techniques, an increased dose of scatter radiation, including neutrons, is delivered to the patient. As a consequence, an increase in second malignancies may be expected in the future with the application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. It is commonly assumed that the neutron dose equivalent scales with the number of monitor units. METHODS: Measurements of neutron dose equivalent were performed for an open and an intensity-modulated field at four positions: inside and outside of the treatment field at 0.2 cm and 15 cm depth, respectively. RESULTS: It was shown that the neutron dose equivalent, which a patient receives during an intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment, does not scale with the ratio of applied monitor units relative to an open field irradiation. Outside the treatment volume at larger depth 35% less neutron dose equivalent is delivered than expected. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted increase of second cancer induction rates from intensity-modulated treatment techniques can be overestimated when the neutron dose is simply scaled with monitor units. BioMed Central 2012-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3487990/ /pubmed/22883384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-138 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hälg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hälg, Roger A
Besserer, Jürgen
Boschung, Markus
Mayer, Sabine
Schneider, Uwe
Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT
title Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT
title_full Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT
title_fullStr Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT
title_full_unstemmed Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT
title_short Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT
title_sort monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy imrt
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3487990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22883384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-138
work_keys_str_mv AT halgrogera monitorunitsarenotpredictiveofneutrondoseforhighenergyimrt
AT bessererjurgen monitorunitsarenotpredictiveofneutrondoseforhighenergyimrt
AT boschungmarkus monitorunitsarenotpredictiveofneutrondoseforhighenergyimrt
AT mayersabine monitorunitsarenotpredictiveofneutrondoseforhighenergyimrt
AT schneideruwe monitorunitsarenotpredictiveofneutrondoseforhighenergyimrt