Cargando…

Advantages of functional single-cell isolation method over standard agar plate dilution method as a tool for studying denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil

We recently established a method for isolating functional single cells from environmental samples using a micromanipulator (Functional single-cell (FSC) isolation), and applied it to the study of denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil (Ashida et al. 2010. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:1211–1217). T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishizawa, Tomoyasu, Tago, Kanako, Uei, Yusuke, Ishii, Satoshi, Isobe, Kazuo, Otsuka, Shigeto, Senoo, Keishi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22985609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-2-50
_version_ 1782248570205765632
author Nishizawa, Tomoyasu
Tago, Kanako
Uei, Yusuke
Ishii, Satoshi
Isobe, Kazuo
Otsuka, Shigeto
Senoo, Keishi
author_facet Nishizawa, Tomoyasu
Tago, Kanako
Uei, Yusuke
Ishii, Satoshi
Isobe, Kazuo
Otsuka, Shigeto
Senoo, Keishi
author_sort Nishizawa, Tomoyasu
collection PubMed
description We recently established a method for isolating functional single cells from environmental samples using a micromanipulator (Functional single-cell (FSC) isolation), and applied it to the study of denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil (Ashida et al. 2010. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:1211–1217). To further examine the advantages and possible disadvantages of the FSC method, we isolated denitrifying bacteria from the same rice paddy soil sample using both FSC and standard agar plate dilution (APD) methods and compared in this study. The proportion of denitrifying bacteria in the total isolates was more than 6-fold larger with FSC isolation (57.1%) compared with the APD method (9.2%). Denitrifying bacteria belonging to Alphaproteobacteria and Bacilli were commonly isolated using both methods, whereas those belonging to Betaproteobacteria, which had been found to be active in the denitrification-inductive paddy soil, were isolated only with the FSC method. On the other hand, Actinobacteria were only isolated using the APD method. The mean potential denitrification activity of the FSC isolates was higher than that of the APD isolates. Overall, FSC isolation was confirmed to be an excellent method for studying denitrifying bacteria compared with the standard agar plate dilution method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34880302012-11-05 Advantages of functional single-cell isolation method over standard agar plate dilution method as a tool for studying denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil Nishizawa, Tomoyasu Tago, Kanako Uei, Yusuke Ishii, Satoshi Isobe, Kazuo Otsuka, Shigeto Senoo, Keishi AMB Express Original Article We recently established a method for isolating functional single cells from environmental samples using a micromanipulator (Functional single-cell (FSC) isolation), and applied it to the study of denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil (Ashida et al. 2010. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:1211–1217). To further examine the advantages and possible disadvantages of the FSC method, we isolated denitrifying bacteria from the same rice paddy soil sample using both FSC and standard agar plate dilution (APD) methods and compared in this study. The proportion of denitrifying bacteria in the total isolates was more than 6-fold larger with FSC isolation (57.1%) compared with the APD method (9.2%). Denitrifying bacteria belonging to Alphaproteobacteria and Bacilli were commonly isolated using both methods, whereas those belonging to Betaproteobacteria, which had been found to be active in the denitrification-inductive paddy soil, were isolated only with the FSC method. On the other hand, Actinobacteria were only isolated using the APD method. The mean potential denitrification activity of the FSC isolates was higher than that of the APD isolates. Overall, FSC isolation was confirmed to be an excellent method for studying denitrifying bacteria compared with the standard agar plate dilution method. Springer 2012-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3488030/ /pubmed/22985609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-2-50 Text en Copyright ©2012 Nishizawa et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nishizawa, Tomoyasu
Tago, Kanako
Uei, Yusuke
Ishii, Satoshi
Isobe, Kazuo
Otsuka, Shigeto
Senoo, Keishi
Advantages of functional single-cell isolation method over standard agar plate dilution method as a tool for studying denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil
title Advantages of functional single-cell isolation method over standard agar plate dilution method as a tool for studying denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil
title_full Advantages of functional single-cell isolation method over standard agar plate dilution method as a tool for studying denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil
title_fullStr Advantages of functional single-cell isolation method over standard agar plate dilution method as a tool for studying denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil
title_full_unstemmed Advantages of functional single-cell isolation method over standard agar plate dilution method as a tool for studying denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil
title_short Advantages of functional single-cell isolation method over standard agar plate dilution method as a tool for studying denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil
title_sort advantages of functional single-cell isolation method over standard agar plate dilution method as a tool for studying denitrifying bacteria in rice paddy soil
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22985609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-2-50
work_keys_str_mv AT nishizawatomoyasu advantagesoffunctionalsinglecellisolationmethodoverstandardagarplatedilutionmethodasatoolforstudyingdenitrifyingbacteriainricepaddysoil
AT tagokanako advantagesoffunctionalsinglecellisolationmethodoverstandardagarplatedilutionmethodasatoolforstudyingdenitrifyingbacteriainricepaddysoil
AT ueiyusuke advantagesoffunctionalsinglecellisolationmethodoverstandardagarplatedilutionmethodasatoolforstudyingdenitrifyingbacteriainricepaddysoil
AT ishiisatoshi advantagesoffunctionalsinglecellisolationmethodoverstandardagarplatedilutionmethodasatoolforstudyingdenitrifyingbacteriainricepaddysoil
AT isobekazuo advantagesoffunctionalsinglecellisolationmethodoverstandardagarplatedilutionmethodasatoolforstudyingdenitrifyingbacteriainricepaddysoil
AT otsukashigeto advantagesoffunctionalsinglecellisolationmethodoverstandardagarplatedilutionmethodasatoolforstudyingdenitrifyingbacteriainricepaddysoil
AT senookeishi advantagesoffunctionalsinglecellisolationmethodoverstandardagarplatedilutionmethodasatoolforstudyingdenitrifyingbacteriainricepaddysoil