Cargando…

Embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible?: A mechanical study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The most frequently used bones for mechanical testing of orthopedic and trauma devices are fresh frozen cadaveric bones, embalmed cadaveric bones, and artificial composite bones. Even today, the comparability of these different bone types has not been established. METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topp, Tobias, Müller, Thorben, Huss, Sebastian, Kann, Peter Herbert, Weihe, Eberhard, Ruchholtz, Steffen, Zettl, Ralph Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22978564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.727079
_version_ 1782248577921187840
author Topp, Tobias
Müller, Thorben
Huss, Sebastian
Kann, Peter Herbert
Weihe, Eberhard
Ruchholtz, Steffen
Zettl, Ralph Peter
author_facet Topp, Tobias
Müller, Thorben
Huss, Sebastian
Kann, Peter Herbert
Weihe, Eberhard
Ruchholtz, Steffen
Zettl, Ralph Peter
author_sort Topp, Tobias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The most frequently used bones for mechanical testing of orthopedic and trauma devices are fresh frozen cadaveric bones, embalmed cadaveric bones, and artificial composite bones. Even today, the comparability of these different bone types has not been established. METHODS: We tested fresh frozen and embalmed cadaveric femora that were similar concerning age, sex, bone mineral density, and stiffness. Artificial composite femora were used as a reference group. Testing parameters were pullout forces of cortex and cancellous screws, maximum load until failure, and type of fracture generated. RESULTS: Stiffness and type of fracture generated (Pauwels III) were similar for all 3 bone types (fresh frozen: 969 N/mm, 95% confidence interval (CI): 897–1,039; embalmed: 999 N/mm, CI: 875–1,121; composite: 946 N/mm, CI: 852–1,040). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between fresh frozen and embalmed femora concerning pullout forces of cancellous screws (fresh frozen: 654 N, CI: 471–836; embalmed: 595 N, CI: 365–823) and cortex screws (fresh frozen: 1,152 N, CI: 894–1,408; embalmed: 1,461 N, CI: 880–2,042), and axial load until failure (fresh frozen: 3,427 N, CI: 2,564–4290; embalmed: 3,603 N, CI: 2,898–4,306). The reference group showed statistically significantly different results for pullout forces of cancellous screws (2,344 N, CI: 2,068–2,620) and cortex screws (5,536 N, CI: 5,203–5,867) and for the axial load until failure (> 7,952 N). INTERPRETATION: Embalmed femur bones and fresh frozen bones had similar characteristics by mechanical testing. Thus, we suggest that embalmed human cadaveric bone is a good and safe option for mechanical testing of orthopedic and trauma devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34881842012-11-05 Embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible?: A mechanical study Topp, Tobias Müller, Thorben Huss, Sebastian Kann, Peter Herbert Weihe, Eberhard Ruchholtz, Steffen Zettl, Ralph Peter Acta Orthop Cadaver Bone BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The most frequently used bones for mechanical testing of orthopedic and trauma devices are fresh frozen cadaveric bones, embalmed cadaveric bones, and artificial composite bones. Even today, the comparability of these different bone types has not been established. METHODS: We tested fresh frozen and embalmed cadaveric femora that were similar concerning age, sex, bone mineral density, and stiffness. Artificial composite femora were used as a reference group. Testing parameters were pullout forces of cortex and cancellous screws, maximum load until failure, and type of fracture generated. RESULTS: Stiffness and type of fracture generated (Pauwels III) were similar for all 3 bone types (fresh frozen: 969 N/mm, 95% confidence interval (CI): 897–1,039; embalmed: 999 N/mm, CI: 875–1,121; composite: 946 N/mm, CI: 852–1,040). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between fresh frozen and embalmed femora concerning pullout forces of cancellous screws (fresh frozen: 654 N, CI: 471–836; embalmed: 595 N, CI: 365–823) and cortex screws (fresh frozen: 1,152 N, CI: 894–1,408; embalmed: 1,461 N, CI: 880–2,042), and axial load until failure (fresh frozen: 3,427 N, CI: 2,564–4290; embalmed: 3,603 N, CI: 2,898–4,306). The reference group showed statistically significantly different results for pullout forces of cancellous screws (2,344 N, CI: 2,068–2,620) and cortex screws (5,536 N, CI: 5,203–5,867) and for the axial load until failure (> 7,952 N). INTERPRETATION: Embalmed femur bones and fresh frozen bones had similar characteristics by mechanical testing. Thus, we suggest that embalmed human cadaveric bone is a good and safe option for mechanical testing of orthopedic and trauma devices. Informa Healthcare 2012-10 2012-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3488184/ /pubmed/22978564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.727079 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Cadaver Bone
Topp, Tobias
Müller, Thorben
Huss, Sebastian
Kann, Peter Herbert
Weihe, Eberhard
Ruchholtz, Steffen
Zettl, Ralph Peter
Embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible?: A mechanical study
title Embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible?: A mechanical study
title_full Embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible?: A mechanical study
title_fullStr Embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible?: A mechanical study
title_full_unstemmed Embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible?: A mechanical study
title_short Embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible?: A mechanical study
title_sort embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible?: a mechanical study
topic Cadaver Bone
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22978564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.727079
work_keys_str_mv AT topptobias embalmedandfreshfrozenhumanbonesinorthopediccadavericstudieswhichboneisauthenticandfeasibleamechanicalstudy
AT mullerthorben embalmedandfreshfrozenhumanbonesinorthopediccadavericstudieswhichboneisauthenticandfeasibleamechanicalstudy
AT husssebastian embalmedandfreshfrozenhumanbonesinorthopediccadavericstudieswhichboneisauthenticandfeasibleamechanicalstudy
AT kannpeterherbert embalmedandfreshfrozenhumanbonesinorthopediccadavericstudieswhichboneisauthenticandfeasibleamechanicalstudy
AT weiheeberhard embalmedandfreshfrozenhumanbonesinorthopediccadavericstudieswhichboneisauthenticandfeasibleamechanicalstudy
AT ruchholtzsteffen embalmedandfreshfrozenhumanbonesinorthopediccadavericstudieswhichboneisauthenticandfeasibleamechanicalstudy
AT zettlralphpeter embalmedandfreshfrozenhumanbonesinorthopediccadavericstudieswhichboneisauthenticandfeasibleamechanicalstudy