Cargando…

Complementary strand relocation may play vital roles in RecA-based homology recognition

RecA-family proteins mediate homologous recombination and recombinational DNA repair through homology search and strand exchange. Initially, the protein forms a filament with the incoming single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) bound in site I. The RecA–ssDNA filament then binds double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peacock-Villada, Alexandra, Yang, Darren, Danilowicz, Claudia, Feinstein, Efraim, Pollock, Nolan, McShan, Sarah, Coljee, Vincent, Prentiss, Mara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22941658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks769
_version_ 1782248586517413888
author Peacock-Villada, Alexandra
Yang, Darren
Danilowicz, Claudia
Feinstein, Efraim
Pollock, Nolan
McShan, Sarah
Coljee, Vincent
Prentiss, Mara
author_facet Peacock-Villada, Alexandra
Yang, Darren
Danilowicz, Claudia
Feinstein, Efraim
Pollock, Nolan
McShan, Sarah
Coljee, Vincent
Prentiss, Mara
author_sort Peacock-Villada, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description RecA-family proteins mediate homologous recombination and recombinational DNA repair through homology search and strand exchange. Initially, the protein forms a filament with the incoming single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) bound in site I. The RecA–ssDNA filament then binds double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in site II. Non-homologous dsDNA rapidly unbinds, whereas homologous dsDNA undergoes strand exchange yielding heteroduplex dsDNA in site I and the leftover outgoing strand in site II. We show that applying force to the ends of the complementary strand significantly retards strand exchange, whereas applying the same force to the outgoing strand does not. We also show that crystallographically determined binding site locations require an intermediate structure in addition to the initial and final structures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the characteristic dsDNA extension rates due to strand exchange and free RecA binding are the same, suggesting that relocation of the complementary strand from its position in the intermediate structure to its position in the final structure limits both rates. Finally, we propose that homology recognition is governed by transitions to and from the intermediate structure, where the transitions depend on differential extension in the dsDNA. This differential extension drives strand exchange forward for homologs and increases the free energy penalty for strand exchange of non-homologs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34882272012-11-06 Complementary strand relocation may play vital roles in RecA-based homology recognition Peacock-Villada, Alexandra Yang, Darren Danilowicz, Claudia Feinstein, Efraim Pollock, Nolan McShan, Sarah Coljee, Vincent Prentiss, Mara Nucleic Acids Res Nucleic Acid Enzymes RecA-family proteins mediate homologous recombination and recombinational DNA repair through homology search and strand exchange. Initially, the protein forms a filament with the incoming single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) bound in site I. The RecA–ssDNA filament then binds double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in site II. Non-homologous dsDNA rapidly unbinds, whereas homologous dsDNA undergoes strand exchange yielding heteroduplex dsDNA in site I and the leftover outgoing strand in site II. We show that applying force to the ends of the complementary strand significantly retards strand exchange, whereas applying the same force to the outgoing strand does not. We also show that crystallographically determined binding site locations require an intermediate structure in addition to the initial and final structures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the characteristic dsDNA extension rates due to strand exchange and free RecA binding are the same, suggesting that relocation of the complementary strand from its position in the intermediate structure to its position in the final structure limits both rates. Finally, we propose that homology recognition is governed by transitions to and from the intermediate structure, where the transitions depend on differential extension in the dsDNA. This differential extension drives strand exchange forward for homologs and increases the free energy penalty for strand exchange of non-homologs. Oxford University Press 2012-11 2012-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3488227/ /pubmed/22941658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks769 Text en © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Nucleic Acid Enzymes
Peacock-Villada, Alexandra
Yang, Darren
Danilowicz, Claudia
Feinstein, Efraim
Pollock, Nolan
McShan, Sarah
Coljee, Vincent
Prentiss, Mara
Complementary strand relocation may play vital roles in RecA-based homology recognition
title Complementary strand relocation may play vital roles in RecA-based homology recognition
title_full Complementary strand relocation may play vital roles in RecA-based homology recognition
title_fullStr Complementary strand relocation may play vital roles in RecA-based homology recognition
title_full_unstemmed Complementary strand relocation may play vital roles in RecA-based homology recognition
title_short Complementary strand relocation may play vital roles in RecA-based homology recognition
title_sort complementary strand relocation may play vital roles in reca-based homology recognition
topic Nucleic Acid Enzymes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22941658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks769
work_keys_str_mv AT peacockvilladaalexandra complementarystrandrelocationmayplayvitalrolesinrecabasedhomologyrecognition
AT yangdarren complementarystrandrelocationmayplayvitalrolesinrecabasedhomologyrecognition
AT danilowiczclaudia complementarystrandrelocationmayplayvitalrolesinrecabasedhomologyrecognition
AT feinsteinefraim complementarystrandrelocationmayplayvitalrolesinrecabasedhomologyrecognition
AT pollocknolan complementarystrandrelocationmayplayvitalrolesinrecabasedhomologyrecognition
AT mcshansarah complementarystrandrelocationmayplayvitalrolesinrecabasedhomologyrecognition
AT coljeevincent complementarystrandrelocationmayplayvitalrolesinrecabasedhomologyrecognition
AT prentissmara complementarystrandrelocationmayplayvitalrolesinrecabasedhomologyrecognition