Cargando…

Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity

Direct cellular DNA damage may lead to genome destabilization in unexposed, bystander, cells sharing the same milieu with directly damaged cells by means of the bystander effect. One proposed mechanism involves double strand break (DSB) formation in S phase cells at sites of single strand lesions in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickey, Jennifer S., Baird, Brandon J., Redon, Christophe E., Avdoshina, Valeriya, Palchik, Guillermo, Wu, Junfang, Kondratyev, Alexei, Bonner, William M., Martin, Olga A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22941641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks795
_version_ 1782248589313966080
author Dickey, Jennifer S.
Baird, Brandon J.
Redon, Christophe E.
Avdoshina, Valeriya
Palchik, Guillermo
Wu, Junfang
Kondratyev, Alexei
Bonner, William M.
Martin, Olga A.
author_facet Dickey, Jennifer S.
Baird, Brandon J.
Redon, Christophe E.
Avdoshina, Valeriya
Palchik, Guillermo
Wu, Junfang
Kondratyev, Alexei
Bonner, William M.
Martin, Olga A.
author_sort Dickey, Jennifer S.
collection PubMed
description Direct cellular DNA damage may lead to genome destabilization in unexposed, bystander, cells sharing the same milieu with directly damaged cells by means of the bystander effect. One proposed mechanism involves double strand break (DSB) formation in S phase cells at sites of single strand lesions in the DNA of replication complexes, which has a more open structure compared with neighboring DNA. The DNA in transcription complexes also has a more open structure, and hence may be susceptible to bystander DSB formation from single strand lesions. To examine whether transcription predisposes non-replicating cells to bystander effect-induced DNA DSBs, we examined two types of primary cells that exhibit high levels of transcription in the absence of replication, rat neurons and human lymphocytes. We found that non-replicating bystander cells with high transcription rates exhibited substantial levels of DNA DSBs, as monitored by γ-H2AX foci formation. Additionally, as reported in proliferating cells, TGF-β and NO were found to mimic bystander effects in cell populations lacking DNA synthesis. These results indicate that cell vulnerability to bystander DSB damage may result from transcription as well as replication. The findings offer insights into which tissues may be vulnerable to bystander genomic destabilization in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34882392012-11-06 Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity Dickey, Jennifer S. Baird, Brandon J. Redon, Christophe E. Avdoshina, Valeriya Palchik, Guillermo Wu, Junfang Kondratyev, Alexei Bonner, William M. Martin, Olga A. Nucleic Acids Res Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication Direct cellular DNA damage may lead to genome destabilization in unexposed, bystander, cells sharing the same milieu with directly damaged cells by means of the bystander effect. One proposed mechanism involves double strand break (DSB) formation in S phase cells at sites of single strand lesions in the DNA of replication complexes, which has a more open structure compared with neighboring DNA. The DNA in transcription complexes also has a more open structure, and hence may be susceptible to bystander DSB formation from single strand lesions. To examine whether transcription predisposes non-replicating cells to bystander effect-induced DNA DSBs, we examined two types of primary cells that exhibit high levels of transcription in the absence of replication, rat neurons and human lymphocytes. We found that non-replicating bystander cells with high transcription rates exhibited substantial levels of DNA DSBs, as monitored by γ-H2AX foci formation. Additionally, as reported in proliferating cells, TGF-β and NO were found to mimic bystander effects in cell populations lacking DNA synthesis. These results indicate that cell vulnerability to bystander DSB damage may result from transcription as well as replication. The findings offer insights into which tissues may be vulnerable to bystander genomic destabilization in vivo. Oxford University Press 2012-11 2012-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3488239/ /pubmed/22941641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks795 Text en Published by Oxford University Press 2012. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication
Dickey, Jennifer S.
Baird, Brandon J.
Redon, Christophe E.
Avdoshina, Valeriya
Palchik, Guillermo
Wu, Junfang
Kondratyev, Alexei
Bonner, William M.
Martin, Olga A.
Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity
title Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity
title_full Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity
title_fullStr Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity
title_full_unstemmed Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity
title_short Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity
title_sort susceptibility to bystander dna damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity
topic Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22941641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks795
work_keys_str_mv AT dickeyjennifers susceptibilitytobystanderdnadamageisinfluencedbyreplicationandtranscriptionalactivity
AT bairdbrandonj susceptibilitytobystanderdnadamageisinfluencedbyreplicationandtranscriptionalactivity
AT redonchristophee susceptibilitytobystanderdnadamageisinfluencedbyreplicationandtranscriptionalactivity
AT avdoshinavaleriya susceptibilitytobystanderdnadamageisinfluencedbyreplicationandtranscriptionalactivity
AT palchikguillermo susceptibilitytobystanderdnadamageisinfluencedbyreplicationandtranscriptionalactivity
AT wujunfang susceptibilitytobystanderdnadamageisinfluencedbyreplicationandtranscriptionalactivity
AT kondratyevalexei susceptibilitytobystanderdnadamageisinfluencedbyreplicationandtranscriptionalactivity
AT bonnerwilliamm susceptibilitytobystanderdnadamageisinfluencedbyreplicationandtranscriptionalactivity
AT martinolgaa susceptibilitytobystanderdnadamageisinfluencedbyreplicationandtranscriptionalactivity