Cargando…

A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

RNA-seq, has recently become an attractive method of choice in the studies of transcriptomes, promising several advantages compared with microarrays. In this study, we sought to assess the contribution of the different analytical steps involved in the analysis of RNA-seq data generated with the Illu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nookaew, Intawat, Papini, Marta, Pornputtapong, Natapol, Scalcinati, Gionata, Fagerberg, Linn, Uhlén, Matthias, Nielsen, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22965124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks804
_version_ 1782248590476836864
author Nookaew, Intawat
Papini, Marta
Pornputtapong, Natapol
Scalcinati, Gionata
Fagerberg, Linn
Uhlén, Matthias
Nielsen, Jens
author_facet Nookaew, Intawat
Papini, Marta
Pornputtapong, Natapol
Scalcinati, Gionata
Fagerberg, Linn
Uhlén, Matthias
Nielsen, Jens
author_sort Nookaew, Intawat
collection PubMed
description RNA-seq, has recently become an attractive method of choice in the studies of transcriptomes, promising several advantages compared with microarrays. In this study, we sought to assess the contribution of the different analytical steps involved in the analysis of RNA-seq data generated with the Illumina platform, and to perform a cross-platform comparison based on the results obtained through Affymetrix microarray. As a case study for our work we, used the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CEN.PK 113-7D, grown under two different conditions (batch and chemostat). Here, we asses the influence of genetic variation on the estimation of gene expression level using three different aligners for read-mapping (Gsnap, Stampy and TopHat) on S288c genome, the capabilities of five different statistical methods to detect differential gene expression (baySeq, Cuffdiff, DESeq, edgeR and NOISeq) and we explored the consistency between RNA-seq analysis using reference genome and de novo assembly approach. High reproducibility among biological replicates (correlation ≥0.99) and high consistency between the two platforms for analysis of gene expression levels (correlation ≥0.91) are reported. The results from differential gene expression identification derived from the different statistical methods, as well as their integrated analysis results based on gene ontology annotation are in good agreement. Overall, our study provides a useful and comprehensive comparison between the two platforms (RNA-seq and microrrays) for gene expression analysis and addresses the contribution of the different steps involved in the analysis of RNA-seq data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34882442012-11-06 A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nookaew, Intawat Papini, Marta Pornputtapong, Natapol Scalcinati, Gionata Fagerberg, Linn Uhlén, Matthias Nielsen, Jens Nucleic Acids Res Computational Biology RNA-seq, has recently become an attractive method of choice in the studies of transcriptomes, promising several advantages compared with microarrays. In this study, we sought to assess the contribution of the different analytical steps involved in the analysis of RNA-seq data generated with the Illumina platform, and to perform a cross-platform comparison based on the results obtained through Affymetrix microarray. As a case study for our work we, used the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CEN.PK 113-7D, grown under two different conditions (batch and chemostat). Here, we asses the influence of genetic variation on the estimation of gene expression level using three different aligners for read-mapping (Gsnap, Stampy and TopHat) on S288c genome, the capabilities of five different statistical methods to detect differential gene expression (baySeq, Cuffdiff, DESeq, edgeR and NOISeq) and we explored the consistency between RNA-seq analysis using reference genome and de novo assembly approach. High reproducibility among biological replicates (correlation ≥0.99) and high consistency between the two platforms for analysis of gene expression levels (correlation ≥0.91) are reported. The results from differential gene expression identification derived from the different statistical methods, as well as their integrated analysis results based on gene ontology annotation are in good agreement. Overall, our study provides a useful and comprehensive comparison between the two platforms (RNA-seq and microrrays) for gene expression analysis and addresses the contribution of the different steps involved in the analysis of RNA-seq data. Oxford University Press 2012-11 2012-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3488244/ /pubmed/22965124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks804 Text en © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Computational Biology
Nookaew, Intawat
Papini, Marta
Pornputtapong, Natapol
Scalcinati, Gionata
Fagerberg, Linn
Uhlén, Matthias
Nielsen, Jens
A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_full A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_fullStr A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_short A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_sort comprehensive comparison of rna-seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in saccharomyces cerevisiae
topic Computational Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22965124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks804
work_keys_str_mv AT nookaewintawat acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT papinimarta acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT pornputtapongnatapol acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT scalcinatigionata acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT fagerberglinn acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT uhlenmatthias acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT nielsenjens acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT nookaewintawat comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT papinimarta comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT pornputtapongnatapol comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT scalcinatigionata comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT fagerberglinn comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT uhlenmatthias comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT nielsenjens comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae