Cargando…
A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
RNA-seq, has recently become an attractive method of choice in the studies of transcriptomes, promising several advantages compared with microarrays. In this study, we sought to assess the contribution of the different analytical steps involved in the analysis of RNA-seq data generated with the Illu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22965124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks804 |
_version_ | 1782248590476836864 |
---|---|
author | Nookaew, Intawat Papini, Marta Pornputtapong, Natapol Scalcinati, Gionata Fagerberg, Linn Uhlén, Matthias Nielsen, Jens |
author_facet | Nookaew, Intawat Papini, Marta Pornputtapong, Natapol Scalcinati, Gionata Fagerberg, Linn Uhlén, Matthias Nielsen, Jens |
author_sort | Nookaew, Intawat |
collection | PubMed |
description | RNA-seq, has recently become an attractive method of choice in the studies of transcriptomes, promising several advantages compared with microarrays. In this study, we sought to assess the contribution of the different analytical steps involved in the analysis of RNA-seq data generated with the Illumina platform, and to perform a cross-platform comparison based on the results obtained through Affymetrix microarray. As a case study for our work we, used the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CEN.PK 113-7D, grown under two different conditions (batch and chemostat). Here, we asses the influence of genetic variation on the estimation of gene expression level using three different aligners for read-mapping (Gsnap, Stampy and TopHat) on S288c genome, the capabilities of five different statistical methods to detect differential gene expression (baySeq, Cuffdiff, DESeq, edgeR and NOISeq) and we explored the consistency between RNA-seq analysis using reference genome and de novo assembly approach. High reproducibility among biological replicates (correlation ≥0.99) and high consistency between the two platforms for analysis of gene expression levels (correlation ≥0.91) are reported. The results from differential gene expression identification derived from the different statistical methods, as well as their integrated analysis results based on gene ontology annotation are in good agreement. Overall, our study provides a useful and comprehensive comparison between the two platforms (RNA-seq and microrrays) for gene expression analysis and addresses the contribution of the different steps involved in the analysis of RNA-seq data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3488244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34882442012-11-06 A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nookaew, Intawat Papini, Marta Pornputtapong, Natapol Scalcinati, Gionata Fagerberg, Linn Uhlén, Matthias Nielsen, Jens Nucleic Acids Res Computational Biology RNA-seq, has recently become an attractive method of choice in the studies of transcriptomes, promising several advantages compared with microarrays. In this study, we sought to assess the contribution of the different analytical steps involved in the analysis of RNA-seq data generated with the Illumina platform, and to perform a cross-platform comparison based on the results obtained through Affymetrix microarray. As a case study for our work we, used the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CEN.PK 113-7D, grown under two different conditions (batch and chemostat). Here, we asses the influence of genetic variation on the estimation of gene expression level using three different aligners for read-mapping (Gsnap, Stampy and TopHat) on S288c genome, the capabilities of five different statistical methods to detect differential gene expression (baySeq, Cuffdiff, DESeq, edgeR and NOISeq) and we explored the consistency between RNA-seq analysis using reference genome and de novo assembly approach. High reproducibility among biological replicates (correlation ≥0.99) and high consistency between the two platforms for analysis of gene expression levels (correlation ≥0.91) are reported. The results from differential gene expression identification derived from the different statistical methods, as well as their integrated analysis results based on gene ontology annotation are in good agreement. Overall, our study provides a useful and comprehensive comparison between the two platforms (RNA-seq and microrrays) for gene expression analysis and addresses the contribution of the different steps involved in the analysis of RNA-seq data. Oxford University Press 2012-11 2012-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3488244/ /pubmed/22965124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks804 Text en © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Computational Biology Nookaew, Intawat Papini, Marta Pornputtapong, Natapol Scalcinati, Gionata Fagerberg, Linn Uhlén, Matthias Nielsen, Jens A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
title | A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
|
title_full | A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
|
title_fullStr | A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
|
title_full_unstemmed | A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
|
title_short | A comprehensive comparison of RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
|
title_sort | comprehensive comparison of rna-seq-based transcriptome analysis from reads to differential gene expression and cross-comparison with microarrays: a case study in saccharomyces cerevisiae |
topic | Computational Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22965124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nookaewintawat acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT papinimarta acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT pornputtapongnatapol acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT scalcinatigionata acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT fagerberglinn acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT uhlenmatthias acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT nielsenjens acomprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT nookaewintawat comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT papinimarta comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT pornputtapongnatapol comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT scalcinatigionata comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT fagerberglinn comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT uhlenmatthias comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae AT nielsenjens comprehensivecomparisonofrnaseqbasedtranscriptomeanalysisfromreadstodifferentialgeneexpressionandcrosscomparisonwithmicroarraysacasestudyinsaccharomycescerevisiae |