Cargando…

Effect of influenza vaccines against mismatched strains: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccines are most effective when the antigens in the vaccine match those of circulating influenza strains. The extent to which the vaccine is protective when circulating strains differ from vaccine antigens, or are mismatched, is uncertain. We propose to systematically review t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tricco, Andrea C, Chit, Ayman, Hallett, David, Soobiah, Charlene, Meier, Genevieve, Chen, Maggie, Tashkandi, Mariam, Bauch, Chris, Loeb, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22846340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-35
_version_ 1782248616140734464
author Tricco, Andrea C
Chit, Ayman
Hallett, David
Soobiah, Charlene
Meier, Genevieve
Chen, Maggie
Tashkandi, Mariam
Bauch, Chris
Loeb, Mark
author_facet Tricco, Andrea C
Chit, Ayman
Hallett, David
Soobiah, Charlene
Meier, Genevieve
Chen, Maggie
Tashkandi, Mariam
Bauch, Chris
Loeb, Mark
author_sort Tricco, Andrea C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccines are most effective when the antigens in the vaccine match those of circulating influenza strains. The extent to which the vaccine is protective when circulating strains differ from vaccine antigens, or are mismatched, is uncertain. We propose to systematically review the cross-protection offered by influenza vaccines against circulating influenza A or B viruses that are not antigenically well-matched to vaccine strains. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting laboratory-confirmed influenza among healthy participants vaccinated with antigens of influenza strains that differed from those circulating will be included. The primary outcome is the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza (polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or viral culture). The secondary outcome is the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza through antibody assay (a less sensitive test than PCR or viral culture) alone or combined with PCR, and/ or viral culture. The review will be limited to RCTs written in English. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, previous influenza reviews, and the reference lists of included studies to identify potentially relevant RCTs. Two independent reviewers will conduct all levels of screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal (using the Cochrane risk of bias tool). If appropriate, random effects meta-analysis of vaccine efficacy will be conducted in SAS (version 9.2) by calculating the relative risk. Vaccine efficacy will be calculated using the following formula: (1 - relative risk × 100). The results will be analyzed by type of vaccine (live attenuated, trivalent inactivated, or other). Subgroup analysis will include the effects of age (children, adults, older participants), and influenza A versus influenza B on the results. For influenza B we will also consider variable degrees of antigenic mismatch (lineage and drift mismatch). DISCUSSION: Our results can be used by researchers and policy-makers to help predict the efficacy of influenza vaccines during mismatched influenza seasons. Furthermore, the review will be of interest to patients and clinicians to determine whether to get immunized or support immunization for a particular influenza season.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34884662012-11-05 Effect of influenza vaccines against mismatched strains: a systematic review protocol Tricco, Andrea C Chit, Ayman Hallett, David Soobiah, Charlene Meier, Genevieve Chen, Maggie Tashkandi, Mariam Bauch, Chris Loeb, Mark Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccines are most effective when the antigens in the vaccine match those of circulating influenza strains. The extent to which the vaccine is protective when circulating strains differ from vaccine antigens, or are mismatched, is uncertain. We propose to systematically review the cross-protection offered by influenza vaccines against circulating influenza A or B viruses that are not antigenically well-matched to vaccine strains. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting laboratory-confirmed influenza among healthy participants vaccinated with antigens of influenza strains that differed from those circulating will be included. The primary outcome is the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza (polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or viral culture). The secondary outcome is the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza through antibody assay (a less sensitive test than PCR or viral culture) alone or combined with PCR, and/ or viral culture. The review will be limited to RCTs written in English. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, previous influenza reviews, and the reference lists of included studies to identify potentially relevant RCTs. Two independent reviewers will conduct all levels of screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal (using the Cochrane risk of bias tool). If appropriate, random effects meta-analysis of vaccine efficacy will be conducted in SAS (version 9.2) by calculating the relative risk. Vaccine efficacy will be calculated using the following formula: (1 - relative risk × 100). The results will be analyzed by type of vaccine (live attenuated, trivalent inactivated, or other). Subgroup analysis will include the effects of age (children, adults, older participants), and influenza A versus influenza B on the results. For influenza B we will also consider variable degrees of antigenic mismatch (lineage and drift mismatch). DISCUSSION: Our results can be used by researchers and policy-makers to help predict the efficacy of influenza vaccines during mismatched influenza seasons. Furthermore, the review will be of interest to patients and clinicians to determine whether to get immunized or support immunization for a particular influenza season. BioMed Central 2012-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3488466/ /pubmed/22846340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-35 Text en Copyright ©2012 Tricco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Protocol
Tricco, Andrea C
Chit, Ayman
Hallett, David
Soobiah, Charlene
Meier, Genevieve
Chen, Maggie
Tashkandi, Mariam
Bauch, Chris
Loeb, Mark
Effect of influenza vaccines against mismatched strains: a systematic review protocol
title Effect of influenza vaccines against mismatched strains: a systematic review protocol
title_full Effect of influenza vaccines against mismatched strains: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Effect of influenza vaccines against mismatched strains: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Effect of influenza vaccines against mismatched strains: a systematic review protocol
title_short Effect of influenza vaccines against mismatched strains: a systematic review protocol
title_sort effect of influenza vaccines against mismatched strains: a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22846340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-35
work_keys_str_mv AT triccoandreac effectofinfluenzavaccinesagainstmismatchedstrainsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT chitayman effectofinfluenzavaccinesagainstmismatchedstrainsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT hallettdavid effectofinfluenzavaccinesagainstmismatchedstrainsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT soobiahcharlene effectofinfluenzavaccinesagainstmismatchedstrainsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT meiergenevieve effectofinfluenzavaccinesagainstmismatchedstrainsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT chenmaggie effectofinfluenzavaccinesagainstmismatchedstrainsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT tashkandimariam effectofinfluenzavaccinesagainstmismatchedstrainsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT bauchchris effectofinfluenzavaccinesagainstmismatchedstrainsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT loebmark effectofinfluenzavaccinesagainstmismatchedstrainsasystematicreviewprotocol