Cargando…

Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the association between a KRAS mutational status and various clinicopathologic features including the metastatic pattern in patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (MRCRC). The concordance rates of the KRAS status between primary tumor sites and paired metast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Mi-Jung, Lee, Hye Seung, Kim, Jee Hyun, Kim, Yu Jung, Kwon, Ji Hyun, Lee, Jeong-Ok, Bang, Soo-Mee, Park, Kyoung Un, Kim, Duck-Woo, Kang, Sung-Bum, Kim, Jae-Sung, Lee, Jong Seok, Lee, Keun-Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22876814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-347
_version_ 1782248618229497856
author Kim, Mi-Jung
Lee, Hye Seung
Kim, Jee Hyun
Kim, Yu Jung
Kwon, Ji Hyun
Lee, Jeong-Ok
Bang, Soo-Mee
Park, Kyoung Un
Kim, Duck-Woo
Kang, Sung-Bum
Kim, Jae-Sung
Lee, Jong Seok
Lee, Keun-Wook
author_facet Kim, Mi-Jung
Lee, Hye Seung
Kim, Jee Hyun
Kim, Yu Jung
Kwon, Ji Hyun
Lee, Jeong-Ok
Bang, Soo-Mee
Park, Kyoung Un
Kim, Duck-Woo
Kang, Sung-Bum
Kim, Jae-Sung
Lee, Jong Seok
Lee, Keun-Wook
author_sort Kim, Mi-Jung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We evaluated the association between a KRAS mutational status and various clinicopathologic features including the metastatic pattern in patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (MRCRC). The concordance rates of the KRAS status between primary tumor sites and paired metastatic organs were also analyzed. METHODS: The KRAS mutational status in codons 12, 13, and 61 from formalin-fixed sections of both primary tumors and related metastases was determined by sequencing analysis. One hundred forty-three Korean patients with MRCRC with available tissues (resection or biopsy) from both primary tumors and related metastatic sites were consecutively enrolled. RESULTS: The KRAS mutation rate was 52.4% (75/143) when considering both the primary and metastatic sites. When the relationship between the KRAS status and initial metastatic sites at the time of diagnosis of MRCRC was analyzed, lung metastasis was more frequent as the initial metastatic site in patients with the KRAS mutation than in patients without the KRAS mutation (45.3% vs. 22.1%; P = 0.003). However, liver (37.3% vs. 70.6%; P < 0.001) or distant lymph node metastases (6.7% vs. 19.1%; P = 0.025) were less frequent as the initial metastatic organ in patients with the KRAS mutation than in patients without the KRAS mutation. The discordance rate of KRAS mutational status between primary and paired metastatic sites other than the lung was 12.3% (13/106). Compared with primary tumor sites, the KRAS discordance rate was significantly higher in matched lung metastases [32.4% (12/37)] than in other matched metastatic organs (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Organs initially involved by distant metastasis were different according to the KRAS mutational status in MRCRC patients. The concordance rate (87.7%) of the KRAS mutation status at metastatic sites other than the lung was generally high compared with primary tumor sites; however, lung metastasis had a high rate of KRAS discordance (32.4%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34884752012-11-05 Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer Kim, Mi-Jung Lee, Hye Seung Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Yu Jung Kwon, Ji Hyun Lee, Jeong-Ok Bang, Soo-Mee Park, Kyoung Un Kim, Duck-Woo Kang, Sung-Bum Kim, Jae-Sung Lee, Jong Seok Lee, Keun-Wook BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: We evaluated the association between a KRAS mutational status and various clinicopathologic features including the metastatic pattern in patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (MRCRC). The concordance rates of the KRAS status between primary tumor sites and paired metastatic organs were also analyzed. METHODS: The KRAS mutational status in codons 12, 13, and 61 from formalin-fixed sections of both primary tumors and related metastases was determined by sequencing analysis. One hundred forty-three Korean patients with MRCRC with available tissues (resection or biopsy) from both primary tumors and related metastatic sites were consecutively enrolled. RESULTS: The KRAS mutation rate was 52.4% (75/143) when considering both the primary and metastatic sites. When the relationship between the KRAS status and initial metastatic sites at the time of diagnosis of MRCRC was analyzed, lung metastasis was more frequent as the initial metastatic site in patients with the KRAS mutation than in patients without the KRAS mutation (45.3% vs. 22.1%; P = 0.003). However, liver (37.3% vs. 70.6%; P < 0.001) or distant lymph node metastases (6.7% vs. 19.1%; P = 0.025) were less frequent as the initial metastatic organ in patients with the KRAS mutation than in patients without the KRAS mutation. The discordance rate of KRAS mutational status between primary and paired metastatic sites other than the lung was 12.3% (13/106). Compared with primary tumor sites, the KRAS discordance rate was significantly higher in matched lung metastases [32.4% (12/37)] than in other matched metastatic organs (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Organs initially involved by distant metastasis were different according to the KRAS mutational status in MRCRC patients. The concordance rate (87.7%) of the KRAS mutation status at metastatic sites other than the lung was generally high compared with primary tumor sites; however, lung metastasis had a high rate of KRAS discordance (32.4%). BioMed Central 2012-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3488475/ /pubmed/22876814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-347 Text en Copyright ©2012 Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Mi-Jung
Lee, Hye Seung
Kim, Jee Hyun
Kim, Yu Jung
Kwon, Ji Hyun
Lee, Jeong-Ok
Bang, Soo-Mee
Park, Kyoung Un
Kim, Duck-Woo
Kang, Sung-Bum
Kim, Jae-Sung
Lee, Jong Seok
Lee, Keun-Wook
Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer
title Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer
title_full Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer
title_short Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer
title_sort different metastatic pattern according to the kras mutational status and site-specific discordance of kras status in patients with colorectal cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22876814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-347
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmijung differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT leehyeseung differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT kimjeehyun differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT kimyujung differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT kwonjihyun differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT leejeongok differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT bangsoomee differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT parkkyoungun differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT kimduckwoo differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT kangsungbum differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT kimjaesung differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT leejongseok differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT leekeunwook differentmetastaticpatternaccordingtothekrasmutationalstatusandsitespecificdiscordanceofkrasstatusinpatientswithcolorectalcancer