Cargando…

The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective

OBJECTIVES: Patient experience questionnaires have been criticised owing to the lack of supporting psychometric evidence. The objective of this study was to describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ) in Norway. DESIGN: Questionnaire de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iversen, Hilde Hestad, Holmboe, Olaf, Bjertnæs, Øyvind Andresen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23024255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001437
_version_ 1782248663229136896
author Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Holmboe, Olaf
Bjertnæs, Øyvind Andresen
author_facet Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Holmboe, Olaf
Bjertnæs, Øyvind Andresen
author_sort Iversen, Hilde Hestad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patient experience questionnaires have been criticised owing to the lack of supporting psychometric evidence. The objective of this study was to describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ) in Norway. DESIGN: Questionnaire development was based on a literature review of existing questionnaires, patient interviews, expert-group consultations, pretesting of questionnaire items and a national survey. Psychometric evaluation included exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and tests of internal consistency reliability and test–retest reliability. SETTING: Data were collected using a postal survey of cancer patients attending 54 hospitals in all 4 health regions. The subjects were 14 227 adult cancer patients who had attended an outpatient clinic or who had been discharged from an inpatient ward. Patients with all types of cancer were included. Data quality, internal consistency reliability and construct validity were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 13 846 patients who received the CPEQ, 7212 (52%) responded. Exploratory factor analysis identified six scales of outpatient experiences relating to nurse contact, doctor contact, information, organisation, patient safety and contact with next of kin, and seven scales of inpatient experiences, with the addition of hospital standard to the aforementioned scales. All but two of the scales met the criterion of 0.70 for Cronbach's α testing, and test–retest correlations ranged from 0.57 to 0.85. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the interpretation of six and seven scales for outpatients and inpatients, respectively. Statistically significant associations based on explicit hypotheses provided evidence for the construct validity of the scales. One additional scale measuring the hospital level was identified (α=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The CPEQ is a self-report instrument that includes the most important aspects of patient experiences with cancer care at hospitals. The instrument was tested following a national survey in Norway; good evidence is provided herein for the internal consistency reliability, test–retest reliability and construct validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34887072012-11-05 The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective Iversen, Hilde Hestad Holmboe, Olaf Bjertnæs, Øyvind Andresen BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: Patient experience questionnaires have been criticised owing to the lack of supporting psychometric evidence. The objective of this study was to describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ) in Norway. DESIGN: Questionnaire development was based on a literature review of existing questionnaires, patient interviews, expert-group consultations, pretesting of questionnaire items and a national survey. Psychometric evaluation included exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and tests of internal consistency reliability and test–retest reliability. SETTING: Data were collected using a postal survey of cancer patients attending 54 hospitals in all 4 health regions. The subjects were 14 227 adult cancer patients who had attended an outpatient clinic or who had been discharged from an inpatient ward. Patients with all types of cancer were included. Data quality, internal consistency reliability and construct validity were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 13 846 patients who received the CPEQ, 7212 (52%) responded. Exploratory factor analysis identified six scales of outpatient experiences relating to nurse contact, doctor contact, information, organisation, patient safety and contact with next of kin, and seven scales of inpatient experiences, with the addition of hospital standard to the aforementioned scales. All but two of the scales met the criterion of 0.70 for Cronbach's α testing, and test–retest correlations ranged from 0.57 to 0.85. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the interpretation of six and seven scales for outpatients and inpatients, respectively. Statistically significant associations based on explicit hypotheses provided evidence for the construct validity of the scales. One additional scale measuring the hospital level was identified (α=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The CPEQ is a self-report instrument that includes the most important aspects of patient experiences with cancer care at hospitals. The instrument was tested following a national survey in Norway; good evidence is provided herein for the internal consistency reliability, test–retest reliability and construct validity. BMJ Group 2012 2012-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3488707/ /pubmed/23024255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001437 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Holmboe, Olaf
Bjertnæs, Øyvind Andresen
The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective
title The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective
title_full The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective
title_fullStr The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective
title_full_unstemmed The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective
title_short The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective
title_sort cancer patient experiences questionnaire (cpeq): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23024255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001437
work_keys_str_mv AT iversenhildehestad thecancerpatientexperiencesquestionnairecpeqreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurveytoassesshospitalcancercarefromthepatientperspective
AT holmboeolaf thecancerpatientexperiencesquestionnairecpeqreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurveytoassesshospitalcancercarefromthepatientperspective
AT bjertnæsøyvindandresen thecancerpatientexperiencesquestionnairecpeqreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurveytoassesshospitalcancercarefromthepatientperspective
AT iversenhildehestad cancerpatientexperiencesquestionnairecpeqreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurveytoassesshospitalcancercarefromthepatientperspective
AT holmboeolaf cancerpatientexperiencesquestionnairecpeqreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurveytoassesshospitalcancercarefromthepatientperspective
AT bjertnæsøyvindandresen cancerpatientexperiencesquestionnairecpeqreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurveytoassesshospitalcancercarefromthepatientperspective