Cargando…

Discrepancy in patient-rated and oncologist-rated performance status on depression and anxiety in cancer: a prospective study protocol

OBJECTIVE: Psychological distress is common in patients with cancer. We need a rapid means of screening for and identifying depression and anxiety in patients with cancer. The present study evaluates the potential of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) scoring as a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mei Hsien, Caryn Chan, Wan Azman, Wan Azmad, Md Yusof, Mastura, Ho, Gwo Fuang, Krupat, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23035016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001799
_version_ 1782248669571973120
author Mei Hsien, Caryn Chan
Wan Azman, Wan Azmad
Md Yusof, Mastura
Ho, Gwo Fuang
Krupat, Edward
author_facet Mei Hsien, Caryn Chan
Wan Azman, Wan Azmad
Md Yusof, Mastura
Ho, Gwo Fuang
Krupat, Edward
author_sort Mei Hsien, Caryn Chan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Psychological distress is common in patients with cancer. We need a rapid means of screening for and identifying depression and anxiety in patients with cancer. The present study evaluates the potential of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) scoring as a brief screening tool to assess psychological distress in routine cancer care. The ECOG PS is widely used by oncologists and the WHO, as a standardised measure to assess general well-being in patients with cancer and quality of life in cancer trials. We examine the discrepancy between patient-rated and oncologist-rated PS scores on the ECOG in a comparative assessment against the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a prospective evaluation of approximately 500 ambulatory adult cancer patients from a large academic medical centre. Participants will be asked to assess their own ECOG PS on a scale of 0–4, which will be compared to ECOG PS as rated by their oncologists. Higher ECOG PS scores indicate poorer daily functioning. Both patient-rated and oncologist-rated ECOG PS and their absolute differences will be tested for predictive and concurrent validity against the HADS. A HADS cut-off ≥15 will be used. Ethics approval for this study has been secured from the institutional ethics board. Outcomes are re-evaluated at 4-week to 6-week and 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study holds practical significance for rapid screening of psychological distress in the cancer clinic with the use of the ECOG PS scoring. Given the high prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with cancer, screening is important to increase its recognition, which will, in turn, help to direct referrals and deliver appropriate intervention. This study also generates greater insight into the association between psychosomatic complaints and psychological distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: MEC 896.52.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34887342012-11-05 Discrepancy in patient-rated and oncologist-rated performance status on depression and anxiety in cancer: a prospective study protocol Mei Hsien, Caryn Chan Wan Azman, Wan Azmad Md Yusof, Mastura Ho, Gwo Fuang Krupat, Edward BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVE: Psychological distress is common in patients with cancer. We need a rapid means of screening for and identifying depression and anxiety in patients with cancer. The present study evaluates the potential of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) scoring as a brief screening tool to assess psychological distress in routine cancer care. The ECOG PS is widely used by oncologists and the WHO, as a standardised measure to assess general well-being in patients with cancer and quality of life in cancer trials. We examine the discrepancy between patient-rated and oncologist-rated PS scores on the ECOG in a comparative assessment against the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a prospective evaluation of approximately 500 ambulatory adult cancer patients from a large academic medical centre. Participants will be asked to assess their own ECOG PS on a scale of 0–4, which will be compared to ECOG PS as rated by their oncologists. Higher ECOG PS scores indicate poorer daily functioning. Both patient-rated and oncologist-rated ECOG PS and their absolute differences will be tested for predictive and concurrent validity against the HADS. A HADS cut-off ≥15 will be used. Ethics approval for this study has been secured from the institutional ethics board. Outcomes are re-evaluated at 4-week to 6-week and 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study holds practical significance for rapid screening of psychological distress in the cancer clinic with the use of the ECOG PS scoring. Given the high prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with cancer, screening is important to increase its recognition, which will, in turn, help to direct referrals and deliver appropriate intervention. This study also generates greater insight into the association between psychosomatic complaints and psychological distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: MEC 896.52. BMJ Group 2012 2012-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3488734/ /pubmed/23035016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001799 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Oncology
Mei Hsien, Caryn Chan
Wan Azman, Wan Azmad
Md Yusof, Mastura
Ho, Gwo Fuang
Krupat, Edward
Discrepancy in patient-rated and oncologist-rated performance status on depression and anxiety in cancer: a prospective study protocol
title Discrepancy in patient-rated and oncologist-rated performance status on depression and anxiety in cancer: a prospective study protocol
title_full Discrepancy in patient-rated and oncologist-rated performance status on depression and anxiety in cancer: a prospective study protocol
title_fullStr Discrepancy in patient-rated and oncologist-rated performance status on depression and anxiety in cancer: a prospective study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy in patient-rated and oncologist-rated performance status on depression and anxiety in cancer: a prospective study protocol
title_short Discrepancy in patient-rated and oncologist-rated performance status on depression and anxiety in cancer: a prospective study protocol
title_sort discrepancy in patient-rated and oncologist-rated performance status on depression and anxiety in cancer: a prospective study protocol
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23035016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001799
work_keys_str_mv AT meihsiencarynchan discrepancyinpatientratedandoncologistratedperformancestatusondepressionandanxietyincanceraprospectivestudyprotocol
AT wanazmanwanazmad discrepancyinpatientratedandoncologistratedperformancestatusondepressionandanxietyincanceraprospectivestudyprotocol
AT mdyusofmastura discrepancyinpatientratedandoncologistratedperformancestatusondepressionandanxietyincanceraprospectivestudyprotocol
AT hogwofuang discrepancyinpatientratedandoncologistratedperformancestatusondepressionandanxietyincanceraprospectivestudyprotocol
AT krupatedward discrepancyinpatientratedandoncologistratedperformancestatusondepressionandanxietyincanceraprospectivestudyprotocol