Cargando…
A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Health service accreditation programmes are a regulatory mechanism adopted to drive improvements inpatient safety and quality. Research investigating the benefits or limitations, of consumer involvement in accreditation programmes is negligible. To develop our knowledge in this area th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23059848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002024 |
_version_ | 1782248670736941056 |
---|---|
author | Greenfield, David Hinchcliff, Reece Moldovan, Max Mumford, Virginia Pawsey, Marjorie Irene Westbrook, Johanna Braithwaite, Jeffrey |
author_facet | Greenfield, David Hinchcliff, Reece Moldovan, Max Mumford, Virginia Pawsey, Marjorie Irene Westbrook, Johanna Braithwaite, Jeffrey |
author_sort | Greenfield, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Health service accreditation programmes are a regulatory mechanism adopted to drive improvements inpatient safety and quality. Research investigating the benefits or limitations, of consumer involvement in accreditation programmes is negligible. To develop our knowledge in this area the ACCREDIT collaboration (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) has developed a research plan, known as the ACCREDIT-SCI (Standards of Consumer Involvement) study protocol. Two complementary studies have been designed: one, to examine the effectiveness of a standard for consumer participation and two, to explore how patient experiences vary across a range of settings with differing accreditation results. METHODS AND DESIGN: The research setting is the Australian healthcare system, and the two studies focus on three accreditation programmes in the primary, acute and aged care domains. The studies will use multimethods: document analysis; interviews and surveys. Participants will be stakeholders across the three domains including: policy officers; frontline healthcare professionals; accreditation agency personnel, including surveyors and healthcare consumers. Drawing on previous experience, the research team has developed purpose-designed tools. Data will be analysed using thematic, narrative and statistical (descriptive and inferential) procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the two studies (HREC 10274). Findings will be disseminated through seminars, conference presentations, academic publications and research partner websites. The findings will be formulated to facilitate uptake by policy and accreditation agency professionals, researchers and academics, and consumers, nationally and internationally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3488739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34887392012-11-05 A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol Greenfield, David Hinchcliff, Reece Moldovan, Max Mumford, Virginia Pawsey, Marjorie Irene Westbrook, Johanna Braithwaite, Jeffrey BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Health service accreditation programmes are a regulatory mechanism adopted to drive improvements inpatient safety and quality. Research investigating the benefits or limitations, of consumer involvement in accreditation programmes is negligible. To develop our knowledge in this area the ACCREDIT collaboration (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) has developed a research plan, known as the ACCREDIT-SCI (Standards of Consumer Involvement) study protocol. Two complementary studies have been designed: one, to examine the effectiveness of a standard for consumer participation and two, to explore how patient experiences vary across a range of settings with differing accreditation results. METHODS AND DESIGN: The research setting is the Australian healthcare system, and the two studies focus on three accreditation programmes in the primary, acute and aged care domains. The studies will use multimethods: document analysis; interviews and surveys. Participants will be stakeholders across the three domains including: policy officers; frontline healthcare professionals; accreditation agency personnel, including surveyors and healthcare consumers. Drawing on previous experience, the research team has developed purpose-designed tools. Data will be analysed using thematic, narrative and statistical (descriptive and inferential) procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the two studies (HREC 10274). Findings will be disseminated through seminars, conference presentations, academic publications and research partner websites. The findings will be formulated to facilitate uptake by policy and accreditation agency professionals, researchers and academics, and consumers, nationally and internationally. BMJ Publishing Group 2012 2012-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3488739/ /pubmed/23059848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002024 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Greenfield, David Hinchcliff, Reece Moldovan, Max Mumford, Virginia Pawsey, Marjorie Irene Westbrook, Johanna Braithwaite, Jeffrey A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol |
title | A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol |
title_full | A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol |
title_fullStr | A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol |
title_short | A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol |
title_sort | multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in australian health service accreditation programmes: the accredit-sci study protocol |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23059848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenfielddavid amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT hinchcliffreece amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT moldovanmax amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT mumfordvirginia amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT pawseymarjorie amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT irenewestbrookjohanna amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT braithwaitejeffrey amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT greenfielddavid multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT hinchcliffreece multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT moldovanmax multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT mumfordvirginia multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT pawseymarjorie multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT irenewestbrookjohanna multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol AT braithwaitejeffrey multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol |