Cargando…

A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Health service accreditation programmes are a regulatory mechanism adopted to drive improvements inpatient safety and quality. Research investigating the benefits or limitations, of consumer involvement in accreditation programmes is negligible. To develop our knowledge in this area th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenfield, David, Hinchcliff, Reece, Moldovan, Max, Mumford, Virginia, Pawsey, Marjorie, Irene Westbrook, Johanna, Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23059848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002024
_version_ 1782248670736941056
author Greenfield, David
Hinchcliff, Reece
Moldovan, Max
Mumford, Virginia
Pawsey, Marjorie
Irene Westbrook, Johanna
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_facet Greenfield, David
Hinchcliff, Reece
Moldovan, Max
Mumford, Virginia
Pawsey, Marjorie
Irene Westbrook, Johanna
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_sort Greenfield, David
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Health service accreditation programmes are a regulatory mechanism adopted to drive improvements inpatient safety and quality. Research investigating the benefits or limitations, of consumer involvement in accreditation programmes is negligible. To develop our knowledge in this area the ACCREDIT collaboration (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) has developed a research plan, known as the ACCREDIT-SCI (Standards of Consumer Involvement) study protocol. Two complementary studies have been designed: one, to examine the effectiveness of a standard for consumer participation and two, to explore how patient experiences vary across a range of settings with differing accreditation results. METHODS AND DESIGN: The research setting is the Australian healthcare system, and the two studies focus on three accreditation programmes in the primary, acute and aged care domains. The studies will use multimethods: document analysis; interviews and surveys. Participants will be stakeholders across the three domains including: policy officers; frontline healthcare professionals; accreditation agency personnel, including surveyors and healthcare consumers. Drawing on previous experience, the research team has developed purpose-designed tools. Data will be analysed using thematic, narrative and statistical (descriptive and inferential) procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the two studies (HREC 10274). Findings will be disseminated through seminars, conference presentations, academic publications and research partner websites. The findings will be formulated to facilitate uptake by policy and accreditation agency professionals, researchers and academics, and consumers, nationally and internationally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34887392012-11-05 A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol Greenfield, David Hinchcliff, Reece Moldovan, Max Mumford, Virginia Pawsey, Marjorie Irene Westbrook, Johanna Braithwaite, Jeffrey BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Health service accreditation programmes are a regulatory mechanism adopted to drive improvements inpatient safety and quality. Research investigating the benefits or limitations, of consumer involvement in accreditation programmes is negligible. To develop our knowledge in this area the ACCREDIT collaboration (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) has developed a research plan, known as the ACCREDIT-SCI (Standards of Consumer Involvement) study protocol. Two complementary studies have been designed: one, to examine the effectiveness of a standard for consumer participation and two, to explore how patient experiences vary across a range of settings with differing accreditation results. METHODS AND DESIGN: The research setting is the Australian healthcare system, and the two studies focus on three accreditation programmes in the primary, acute and aged care domains. The studies will use multimethods: document analysis; interviews and surveys. Participants will be stakeholders across the three domains including: policy officers; frontline healthcare professionals; accreditation agency personnel, including surveyors and healthcare consumers. Drawing on previous experience, the research team has developed purpose-designed tools. Data will be analysed using thematic, narrative and statistical (descriptive and inferential) procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the two studies (HREC 10274). Findings will be disseminated through seminars, conference presentations, academic publications and research partner websites. The findings will be formulated to facilitate uptake by policy and accreditation agency professionals, researchers and academics, and consumers, nationally and internationally. BMJ Publishing Group 2012 2012-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3488739/ /pubmed/23059848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002024 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Greenfield, David
Hinchcliff, Reece
Moldovan, Max
Mumford, Virginia
Pawsey, Marjorie
Irene Westbrook, Johanna
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol
title A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol
title_full A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol
title_fullStr A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol
title_full_unstemmed A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol
title_short A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol
title_sort multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in australian health service accreditation programmes: the accredit-sci study protocol
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23059848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002024
work_keys_str_mv AT greenfielddavid amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT hinchcliffreece amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT moldovanmax amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT mumfordvirginia amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT pawseymarjorie amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT irenewestbrookjohanna amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT braithwaitejeffrey amultimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT greenfielddavid multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT hinchcliffreece multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT moldovanmax multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT mumfordvirginia multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT pawseymarjorie multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT irenewestbrookjohanna multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol
AT braithwaitejeffrey multimethodresearchinvestigationofconsumerinvolvementinaustralianhealthserviceaccreditationprogrammestheaccreditscistudyprotocol