Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To report on the relative cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty and resurfacing arthroplasty (replacement of articular surface of femoral head only) in patients with severe arthritis suitable for hip joint resurfacing arthroplasty. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis on an intentio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edlin, Richard, Tubeuf, Sandy, Achten, Juul, Parsons, Nicholas, Costa, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23065450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001162
_version_ 1782248673118257152
author Edlin, Richard
Tubeuf, Sandy
Achten, Juul
Parsons, Nicholas
Costa, Matthew
author_facet Edlin, Richard
Tubeuf, Sandy
Achten, Juul
Parsons, Nicholas
Costa, Matthew
author_sort Edlin, Richard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To report on the relative cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty and resurfacing arthroplasty (replacement of articular surface of femoral head only) in patients with severe arthritis suitable for hip joint resurfacing arthroplasty. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis on an intention-to-treat basis of a single-centre, single-blind randomised controlled trial of 126 adult patients within 12 months of treatment. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputations with differences in baseline quality of life and gender adjusted using regression techniques. SETTING: A large teaching hospital trust in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 126 adult patients with severe arthritis of the hip joint suitable for a resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. RESULTS: Data were received for 126 patients, 4 of whom did not provide any resource use data. For the remainder, data were imputed for costs or quality of life in at least one time point (baseline, 3, 6 months and 1 year) for 18 patients. Patients in the resurfacing arm had higher quality of life at 12 months (0.795 vs 0.727) and received 0.032 more QALYs within the first 12 months postoperation. At an additional cost of £564, resurfacing arthroplasty offers benefits at £17 451 per QALY within the first 12 months of treatment. When covariates are considered, the health economic case is stronger in men than in women. CONCLUSIONS: Resurfacing arthroplasty appears to offer very short-term efficiency benefits over total hip arthroplasty within a selected patient group. The short-term follow-up in this trial should be noted, particularly in light of the concerns raised regarding adverse reactions to metal debris from metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in the longer term. Longer-term follow-up of resurfacing arthroplasty patients and decision analytic modelling is also advised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled Trials ISRCTN33354155. UKCRN 4093.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3488749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34887492012-11-05 Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial Edlin, Richard Tubeuf, Sandy Achten, Juul Parsons, Nicholas Costa, Matthew BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To report on the relative cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty and resurfacing arthroplasty (replacement of articular surface of femoral head only) in patients with severe arthritis suitable for hip joint resurfacing arthroplasty. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis on an intention-to-treat basis of a single-centre, single-blind randomised controlled trial of 126 adult patients within 12 months of treatment. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputations with differences in baseline quality of life and gender adjusted using regression techniques. SETTING: A large teaching hospital trust in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 126 adult patients with severe arthritis of the hip joint suitable for a resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. RESULTS: Data were received for 126 patients, 4 of whom did not provide any resource use data. For the remainder, data were imputed for costs or quality of life in at least one time point (baseline, 3, 6 months and 1 year) for 18 patients. Patients in the resurfacing arm had higher quality of life at 12 months (0.795 vs 0.727) and received 0.032 more QALYs within the first 12 months postoperation. At an additional cost of £564, resurfacing arthroplasty offers benefits at £17 451 per QALY within the first 12 months of treatment. When covariates are considered, the health economic case is stronger in men than in women. CONCLUSIONS: Resurfacing arthroplasty appears to offer very short-term efficiency benefits over total hip arthroplasty within a selected patient group. The short-term follow-up in this trial should be noted, particularly in light of the concerns raised regarding adverse reactions to metal debris from metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in the longer term. Longer-term follow-up of resurfacing arthroplasty patients and decision analytic modelling is also advised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled Trials ISRCTN33354155. UKCRN 4093. BMJ Publishing Group 2012 2012-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3488749/ /pubmed/23065450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001162 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Edlin, Richard
Tubeuf, Sandy
Achten, Juul
Parsons, Nicholas
Costa, Matthew
Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial
title Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23065450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001162
work_keys_str_mv AT edlinrichard costeffectivenessoftotalhiparthroplastyversusresurfacingarthroplastyeconomicevaluationalongsideaclinicaltrial
AT tubeufsandy costeffectivenessoftotalhiparthroplastyversusresurfacingarthroplastyeconomicevaluationalongsideaclinicaltrial
AT achtenjuul costeffectivenessoftotalhiparthroplastyversusresurfacingarthroplastyeconomicevaluationalongsideaclinicaltrial
AT parsonsnicholas costeffectivenessoftotalhiparthroplastyversusresurfacingarthroplastyeconomicevaluationalongsideaclinicaltrial
AT costamatthew costeffectivenessoftotalhiparthroplastyversusresurfacingarthroplastyeconomicevaluationalongsideaclinicaltrial