Cargando…

Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?

BACKGROUND: Historically, the median overall survival for follicular lymphoma (FL) has been considered to be 9-10 years, and no treatment had ever prolonged this time period. Studies conducted more than 20 years ago demonstrated that treating patients with asymptomatic FL at the onset of the disease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rueda, Antonio, Casanova, María, Redondo, Maximino, Pérez-Ruiz, Elisabeth, Medina-Pérez, Ángeles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22650448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-210
_version_ 1782248742762577920
author Rueda, Antonio
Casanova, María
Redondo, Maximino
Pérez-Ruiz, Elisabeth
Medina-Pérez, Ángeles
author_facet Rueda, Antonio
Casanova, María
Redondo, Maximino
Pérez-Ruiz, Elisabeth
Medina-Pérez, Ángeles
author_sort Rueda, Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Historically, the median overall survival for follicular lymphoma (FL) has been considered to be 9-10 years, and no treatment had ever prolonged this time period. Studies conducted more than 20 years ago demonstrated that treating patients with asymptomatic FL at the onset of the disease did not increase their survival, and that almost 20% of these patients did not need any treatment in the first 10 years of follow-up. Based on these facts, most clinical practice guidelines recommend active surveillance policies for patients with asymptomatic FL. DISCUSSION: The introduction of antiCD-20 monoclonal antibodies, over the last 15 years, has significantly increased the median survival rate to above 14 years. This improvement was achieved before the combination of rituximab and chemotherapy regimens became extensively used in patients with symptomatic disease. Therefore, this increase in survival may currently be more significant. At present, several clinical trials have evaluated low-toxicity therapies that prolong progression-free periods, among which rituximab monotherapy, radioimmunotherapy or the combination of rituximab with bendamustine are the most relevant. Unfortunately, these clinical trials have included only patients with symptomatic FL. The results of a recently reported clinical trial show that treatment with single-agent rituximab prolongs progression-free survival rates, time to new treatment and the quality of life of asymptomatic patients, as compared with the active surveillance strategy. Longer follow-up of these results and data regarding overall survival are awaited before this treatment can be recommended as the standard initial therapy. SUMMARY: There are different therapeutic possibilities for asymptomatic FL patients, but no data are currently available to indicate which option is the best. Patients need to understand the risks and benefits of observation versus treatment before a final decision can be made. For patients who want active treatment the administration of four weekly rituximab doses should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3489567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34895672012-11-06 Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients? Rueda, Antonio Casanova, María Redondo, Maximino Pérez-Ruiz, Elisabeth Medina-Pérez, Ángeles BMC Cancer Debate BACKGROUND: Historically, the median overall survival for follicular lymphoma (FL) has been considered to be 9-10 years, and no treatment had ever prolonged this time period. Studies conducted more than 20 years ago demonstrated that treating patients with asymptomatic FL at the onset of the disease did not increase their survival, and that almost 20% of these patients did not need any treatment in the first 10 years of follow-up. Based on these facts, most clinical practice guidelines recommend active surveillance policies for patients with asymptomatic FL. DISCUSSION: The introduction of antiCD-20 monoclonal antibodies, over the last 15 years, has significantly increased the median survival rate to above 14 years. This improvement was achieved before the combination of rituximab and chemotherapy regimens became extensively used in patients with symptomatic disease. Therefore, this increase in survival may currently be more significant. At present, several clinical trials have evaluated low-toxicity therapies that prolong progression-free periods, among which rituximab monotherapy, radioimmunotherapy or the combination of rituximab with bendamustine are the most relevant. Unfortunately, these clinical trials have included only patients with symptomatic FL. The results of a recently reported clinical trial show that treatment with single-agent rituximab prolongs progression-free survival rates, time to new treatment and the quality of life of asymptomatic patients, as compared with the active surveillance strategy. Longer follow-up of these results and data regarding overall survival are awaited before this treatment can be recommended as the standard initial therapy. SUMMARY: There are different therapeutic possibilities for asymptomatic FL patients, but no data are currently available to indicate which option is the best. Patients need to understand the risks and benefits of observation versus treatment before a final decision can be made. For patients who want active treatment the administration of four weekly rituximab doses should be considered. BioMed Central 2012-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3489567/ /pubmed/22650448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-210 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rueda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Rueda, Antonio
Casanova, María
Redondo, Maximino
Pérez-Ruiz, Elisabeth
Medina-Pérez, Ángeles
Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title_full Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title_fullStr Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title_full_unstemmed Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title_short Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title_sort has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22650448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-210
work_keys_str_mv AT ruedaantonio hasthetimetocomeleavethewatchandwaitstrategyinnewlydiagnosedasymptomaticfollicularlymphomapatients
AT casanovamaria hasthetimetocomeleavethewatchandwaitstrategyinnewlydiagnosedasymptomaticfollicularlymphomapatients
AT redondomaximino hasthetimetocomeleavethewatchandwaitstrategyinnewlydiagnosedasymptomaticfollicularlymphomapatients
AT perezruizelisabeth hasthetimetocomeleavethewatchandwaitstrategyinnewlydiagnosedasymptomaticfollicularlymphomapatients
AT medinaperezangeles hasthetimetocomeleavethewatchandwaitstrategyinnewlydiagnosedasymptomaticfollicularlymphomapatients