Cargando…
Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy
BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is a common condition and its repair (herniorrhaphy) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in general surgery. The Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy technique is a widely used and effective surgery that uses mesh to reinforce the area of weakness. Although a wide rang...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23031606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-12-19 |
_version_ | 1782248743709442048 |
---|---|
author | Rabe, Rannie Yacapin, Clarence Pio Rey Buckley, Brian S Faylona, Jose Macario |
author_facet | Rabe, Rannie Yacapin, Clarence Pio Rey Buckley, Brian S Faylona, Jose Macario |
author_sort | Rabe, Rannie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is a common condition and its repair (herniorrhaphy) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in general surgery. The Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy technique is a widely used and effective surgery that uses mesh to reinforce the area of weakness. Although a wide range of mesh sizes are available for use in hernia repair, in low-resource health care settings the provision of multiple products may not be supportable and it may be necessary for the provision and use of a single mesh size. This study aimed to determine whether the recommended 7.0 cm x 15.0 cm size is an appropriate single mesh size. METHODS: In order to determine the optimal mesh size according to recommended surgical practices, in vivo measurements of key dimensions of the inguinal floor were taken in patients undergoing herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: Measurements were taken in 43 patients: 40 men and 3 women, mean age 43 years (SD 13.6); 39 with indirect hernias, 4 with direct. Allowing for recommended mesh overlaps, the optimal mesh size for provision to be appropriate for the majority of patients was determined to be 8.5 cm x 14.0 cm, 21% wider than the mesh size currently recommended for use in Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriate size for routine provision in low-resource settings, or other settings where the provision of several mesh sizes is not supportable, may be 8.5 cm x 14.0 cm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3489571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34895712012-11-06 Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy Rabe, Rannie Yacapin, Clarence Pio Rey Buckley, Brian S Faylona, Jose Macario BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is a common condition and its repair (herniorrhaphy) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in general surgery. The Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy technique is a widely used and effective surgery that uses mesh to reinforce the area of weakness. Although a wide range of mesh sizes are available for use in hernia repair, in low-resource health care settings the provision of multiple products may not be supportable and it may be necessary for the provision and use of a single mesh size. This study aimed to determine whether the recommended 7.0 cm x 15.0 cm size is an appropriate single mesh size. METHODS: In order to determine the optimal mesh size according to recommended surgical practices, in vivo measurements of key dimensions of the inguinal floor were taken in patients undergoing herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: Measurements were taken in 43 patients: 40 men and 3 women, mean age 43 years (SD 13.6); 39 with indirect hernias, 4 with direct. Allowing for recommended mesh overlaps, the optimal mesh size for provision to be appropriate for the majority of patients was determined to be 8.5 cm x 14.0 cm, 21% wider than the mesh size currently recommended for use in Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriate size for routine provision in low-resource settings, or other settings where the provision of several mesh sizes is not supportable, may be 8.5 cm x 14.0 cm. BioMed Central 2012-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3489571/ /pubmed/23031606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-12-19 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rabe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rabe, Rannie Yacapin, Clarence Pio Rey Buckley, Brian S Faylona, Jose Macario Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy |
title | Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy |
title_full | Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy |
title_fullStr | Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy |
title_full_unstemmed | Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy |
title_short | Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy |
title_sort | repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23031606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-12-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raberannie repeatedinvivoinguinalmeasurementstoestimateasingleoptimalmeshsizeforinguinalherniorrhaphy AT yacapinclarencepiorey repeatedinvivoinguinalmeasurementstoestimateasingleoptimalmeshsizeforinguinalherniorrhaphy AT buckleybrians repeatedinvivoinguinalmeasurementstoestimateasingleoptimalmeshsizeforinguinalherniorrhaphy AT faylonajosemacario repeatedinvivoinguinalmeasurementstoestimateasingleoptimalmeshsizeforinguinalherniorrhaphy |