Cargando…

Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is a common condition and its repair (herniorrhaphy) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in general surgery. The Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy technique is a widely used and effective surgery that uses mesh to reinforce the area of weakness. Although a wide rang...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rabe, Rannie, Yacapin, Clarence Pio Rey, Buckley, Brian S, Faylona, Jose Macario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23031606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-12-19
_version_ 1782248743709442048
author Rabe, Rannie
Yacapin, Clarence Pio Rey
Buckley, Brian S
Faylona, Jose Macario
author_facet Rabe, Rannie
Yacapin, Clarence Pio Rey
Buckley, Brian S
Faylona, Jose Macario
author_sort Rabe, Rannie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is a common condition and its repair (herniorrhaphy) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in general surgery. The Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy technique is a widely used and effective surgery that uses mesh to reinforce the area of weakness. Although a wide range of mesh sizes are available for use in hernia repair, in low-resource health care settings the provision of multiple products may not be supportable and it may be necessary for the provision and use of a single mesh size. This study aimed to determine whether the recommended 7.0 cm x 15.0 cm size is an appropriate single mesh size. METHODS: In order to determine the optimal mesh size according to recommended surgical practices, in vivo measurements of key dimensions of the inguinal floor were taken in patients undergoing herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: Measurements were taken in 43 patients: 40 men and 3 women, mean age 43 years (SD 13.6); 39 with indirect hernias, 4 with direct. Allowing for recommended mesh overlaps, the optimal mesh size for provision to be appropriate for the majority of patients was determined to be 8.5 cm x 14.0 cm, 21% wider than the mesh size currently recommended for use in Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriate size for routine provision in low-resource settings, or other settings where the provision of several mesh sizes is not supportable, may be 8.5 cm x 14.0 cm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3489571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34895712012-11-06 Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy Rabe, Rannie Yacapin, Clarence Pio Rey Buckley, Brian S Faylona, Jose Macario BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is a common condition and its repair (herniorrhaphy) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in general surgery. The Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy technique is a widely used and effective surgery that uses mesh to reinforce the area of weakness. Although a wide range of mesh sizes are available for use in hernia repair, in low-resource health care settings the provision of multiple products may not be supportable and it may be necessary for the provision and use of a single mesh size. This study aimed to determine whether the recommended 7.0 cm x 15.0 cm size is an appropriate single mesh size. METHODS: In order to determine the optimal mesh size according to recommended surgical practices, in vivo measurements of key dimensions of the inguinal floor were taken in patients undergoing herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: Measurements were taken in 43 patients: 40 men and 3 women, mean age 43 years (SD 13.6); 39 with indirect hernias, 4 with direct. Allowing for recommended mesh overlaps, the optimal mesh size for provision to be appropriate for the majority of patients was determined to be 8.5 cm x 14.0 cm, 21% wider than the mesh size currently recommended for use in Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriate size for routine provision in low-resource settings, or other settings where the provision of several mesh sizes is not supportable, may be 8.5 cm x 14.0 cm. BioMed Central 2012-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3489571/ /pubmed/23031606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-12-19 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rabe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rabe, Rannie
Yacapin, Clarence Pio Rey
Buckley, Brian S
Faylona, Jose Macario
Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy
title Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy
title_full Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy
title_fullStr Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy
title_full_unstemmed Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy
title_short Repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy
title_sort repeated in vivo inguinal measurements to estimate a single optimal mesh size for inguinal herniorrhaphy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23031606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-12-19
work_keys_str_mv AT raberannie repeatedinvivoinguinalmeasurementstoestimateasingleoptimalmeshsizeforinguinalherniorrhaphy
AT yacapinclarencepiorey repeatedinvivoinguinalmeasurementstoestimateasingleoptimalmeshsizeforinguinalherniorrhaphy
AT buckleybrians repeatedinvivoinguinalmeasurementstoestimateasingleoptimalmeshsizeforinguinalherniorrhaphy
AT faylonajosemacario repeatedinvivoinguinalmeasurementstoestimateasingleoptimalmeshsizeforinguinalherniorrhaphy