Cargando…
Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011
van der Voet et al. (2011) describe statistical methodology that the European Food Safety Authority expects an applicant to adopt when making a GM crop regulatory submission. Key to their proposed methodology is the inclusion of reference varieties in the experimental design to provide a measure of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22533372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-12-13 |
_version_ | 1782248744627994624 |
---|---|
author | Ward, Keith J Nemeth, Margaret A Brownie, Cavell Hong, Bonnie Herman, Rod A Oberdoerfer, Regina |
author_facet | Ward, Keith J Nemeth, Margaret A Brownie, Cavell Hong, Bonnie Herman, Rod A Oberdoerfer, Regina |
author_sort | Ward, Keith J |
collection | PubMed |
description | van der Voet et al. (2011) describe statistical methodology that the European Food Safety Authority expects an applicant to adopt when making a GM crop regulatory submission. Key to their proposed methodology is the inclusion of reference varieties in the experimental design to provide a measure of natural variation amongst commercially grown crops. While taking proper account of natural variation amongst commercial varieties in the safety assessment of GM plants makes good sense, the methodology described by the authors is shown here to be fundamentally flawed and consequently cannot be considered fit for purpose in its current form. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3489575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34895752012-11-08 Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011 Ward, Keith J Nemeth, Margaret A Brownie, Cavell Hong, Bonnie Herman, Rod A Oberdoerfer, Regina BMC Biotechnol Correspondence van der Voet et al. (2011) describe statistical methodology that the European Food Safety Authority expects an applicant to adopt when making a GM crop regulatory submission. Key to their proposed methodology is the inclusion of reference varieties in the experimental design to provide a measure of natural variation amongst commercially grown crops. While taking proper account of natural variation amongst commercial varieties in the safety assessment of GM plants makes good sense, the methodology described by the authors is shown here to be fundamentally flawed and consequently cannot be considered fit for purpose in its current form. BioMed Central 2012-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3489575/ /pubmed/22533372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-12-13 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ward et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Ward, Keith J Nemeth, Margaret A Brownie, Cavell Hong, Bonnie Herman, Rod A Oberdoerfer, Regina Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011 |
title | Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011 |
title_full | Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011 |
title_fullStr | Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011 |
title_short | Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011 |
title_sort | comments on the paper "a statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der voet et al. 2011 |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22533372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-12-13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wardkeithj commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011 AT nemethmargareta commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011 AT browniecavell commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011 AT hongbonnie commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011 AT hermanroda commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011 AT oberdoerferregina commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011 |