Cargando…

Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011

van der Voet et al. (2011) describe statistical methodology that the European Food Safety Authority expects an applicant to adopt when making a GM crop regulatory submission. Key to their proposed methodology is the inclusion of reference varieties in the experimental design to provide a measure of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward, Keith J, Nemeth, Margaret A, Brownie, Cavell, Hong, Bonnie, Herman, Rod A, Oberdoerfer, Regina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22533372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-12-13
_version_ 1782248744627994624
author Ward, Keith J
Nemeth, Margaret A
Brownie, Cavell
Hong, Bonnie
Herman, Rod A
Oberdoerfer, Regina
author_facet Ward, Keith J
Nemeth, Margaret A
Brownie, Cavell
Hong, Bonnie
Herman, Rod A
Oberdoerfer, Regina
author_sort Ward, Keith J
collection PubMed
description van der Voet et al. (2011) describe statistical methodology that the European Food Safety Authority expects an applicant to adopt when making a GM crop regulatory submission. Key to their proposed methodology is the inclusion of reference varieties in the experimental design to provide a measure of natural variation amongst commercially grown crops. While taking proper account of natural variation amongst commercial varieties in the safety assessment of GM plants makes good sense, the methodology described by the authors is shown here to be fundamentally flawed and consequently cannot be considered fit for purpose in its current form.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3489575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34895752012-11-08 Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011 Ward, Keith J Nemeth, Margaret A Brownie, Cavell Hong, Bonnie Herman, Rod A Oberdoerfer, Regina BMC Biotechnol Correspondence van der Voet et al. (2011) describe statistical methodology that the European Food Safety Authority expects an applicant to adopt when making a GM crop regulatory submission. Key to their proposed methodology is the inclusion of reference varieties in the experimental design to provide a measure of natural variation amongst commercially grown crops. While taking proper account of natural variation amongst commercial varieties in the safety assessment of GM plants makes good sense, the methodology described by the authors is shown here to be fundamentally flawed and consequently cannot be considered fit for purpose in its current form. BioMed Central 2012-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3489575/ /pubmed/22533372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-12-13 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ward et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Ward, Keith J
Nemeth, Margaret A
Brownie, Cavell
Hong, Bonnie
Herman, Rod A
Oberdoerfer, Regina
Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011
title Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011
title_full Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011
title_fullStr Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011
title_full_unstemmed Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011
title_short Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011
title_sort comments on the paper "a statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der voet et al. 2011
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22533372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-12-13
work_keys_str_mv AT wardkeithj commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011
AT nemethmargareta commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011
AT browniecavell commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011
AT hongbonnie commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011
AT hermanroda commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011
AT oberdoerferregina commentsonthepaperastatisticalassessmentofdifferencesandequivalencesbetweengeneticallymodifiedandreferenceplantvarietiesbyvandervoetetal2011