Cargando…
Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population
Maximum carotid artery wall thickness was utilized in a primary prevention population and compared with baseline risk factors. Carotid wall thickness was measured between the blood–intima and media–adventitia interfaces by B-mode ultrasonography using software calipers at points of protrusion. Long-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Inc
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23139904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.82 |
_version_ | 1782248788800307200 |
---|---|
author | Callahan, A S Szarek, Michael Patton, John W Sillesen, Anne-Sophie Jones, Abrill Churchwell, Keith Holliday, H Douglas |
author_facet | Callahan, A S Szarek, Michael Patton, John W Sillesen, Anne-Sophie Jones, Abrill Churchwell, Keith Holliday, H Douglas |
author_sort | Callahan, A S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Maximum carotid artery wall thickness was utilized in a primary prevention population and compared with baseline risk factors. Carotid wall thickness was measured between the blood–intima and media–adventitia interfaces by B-mode ultrasonography using software calipers at points of protrusion. Long-axis measures were confirmed by short-axis assessment. The maximum carotid wall thickness for each subject was divided by age in years to yield an annual accretion rate (called carotid intima–media thickness accretion rate [CIMTAR]). The entire study population was then divided by median CIMTAR to investigate the association with baseline variables used in standard risk assessments with the bifurcated groups. Traditional risk factors such as age, diabetes, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and obesity were not associated with greater than median CIMTAR. Only male gender (P = 0.02) and systolic blood pressure (P = 0.002) in baseline variables were associated with an elevated CIMTAR for the entire population. Among those not taking lipid-lowering therapy at baseline, only systolic blood pressure remained significant (P = 0.0002). Correlations between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level and maximum carotid wall thickness/CIMTAR were weak for the entire population (r = −0.17/r = −0.12, respectively). Measure of maximum carotid wall thickness may select patients earlier for treatment than traditional risk factors. The addition of CIMTAR to risk algorithms may permit a single-point assignation of subsequent vascular risk that is more efficacious than traditional risk factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3489811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34898112012-11-08 Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population Callahan, A S Szarek, Michael Patton, John W Sillesen, Anne-Sophie Jones, Abrill Churchwell, Keith Holliday, H Douglas Brain Behav Original Research Maximum carotid artery wall thickness was utilized in a primary prevention population and compared with baseline risk factors. Carotid wall thickness was measured between the blood–intima and media–adventitia interfaces by B-mode ultrasonography using software calipers at points of protrusion. Long-axis measures were confirmed by short-axis assessment. The maximum carotid wall thickness for each subject was divided by age in years to yield an annual accretion rate (called carotid intima–media thickness accretion rate [CIMTAR]). The entire study population was then divided by median CIMTAR to investigate the association with baseline variables used in standard risk assessments with the bifurcated groups. Traditional risk factors such as age, diabetes, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and obesity were not associated with greater than median CIMTAR. Only male gender (P = 0.02) and systolic blood pressure (P = 0.002) in baseline variables were associated with an elevated CIMTAR for the entire population. Among those not taking lipid-lowering therapy at baseline, only systolic blood pressure remained significant (P = 0.0002). Correlations between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level and maximum carotid wall thickness/CIMTAR were weak for the entire population (r = −0.17/r = −0.12, respectively). Measure of maximum carotid wall thickness may select patients earlier for treatment than traditional risk factors. The addition of CIMTAR to risk algorithms may permit a single-point assignation of subsequent vascular risk that is more efficacious than traditional risk factors. Blackwell Publishing Inc 2012-09 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3489811/ /pubmed/23139904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.82 Text en Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Callahan, A S Szarek, Michael Patton, John W Sillesen, Anne-Sophie Jones, Abrill Churchwell, Keith Holliday, H Douglas Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population |
title | Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population |
title_full | Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population |
title_fullStr | Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population |
title_full_unstemmed | Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population |
title_short | Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population |
title_sort | maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23139904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.82 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT callahanas maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation AT szarekmichael maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation AT pattonjohnw maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation AT sillesenannesophie maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation AT jonesabrill maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation AT churchwellkeith maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation AT hollidayhdouglas maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation |