Cargando…

Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population

Maximum carotid artery wall thickness was utilized in a primary prevention population and compared with baseline risk factors. Carotid wall thickness was measured between the blood–intima and media–adventitia interfaces by B-mode ultrasonography using software calipers at points of protrusion. Long-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Callahan, A S, Szarek, Michael, Patton, John W, Sillesen, Anne-Sophie, Jones, Abrill, Churchwell, Keith, Holliday, H Douglas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Inc 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23139904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.82
_version_ 1782248788800307200
author Callahan, A S
Szarek, Michael
Patton, John W
Sillesen, Anne-Sophie
Jones, Abrill
Churchwell, Keith
Holliday, H Douglas
author_facet Callahan, A S
Szarek, Michael
Patton, John W
Sillesen, Anne-Sophie
Jones, Abrill
Churchwell, Keith
Holliday, H Douglas
author_sort Callahan, A S
collection PubMed
description Maximum carotid artery wall thickness was utilized in a primary prevention population and compared with baseline risk factors. Carotid wall thickness was measured between the blood–intima and media–adventitia interfaces by B-mode ultrasonography using software calipers at points of protrusion. Long-axis measures were confirmed by short-axis assessment. The maximum carotid wall thickness for each subject was divided by age in years to yield an annual accretion rate (called carotid intima–media thickness accretion rate [CIMTAR]). The entire study population was then divided by median CIMTAR to investigate the association with baseline variables used in standard risk assessments with the bifurcated groups. Traditional risk factors such as age, diabetes, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and obesity were not associated with greater than median CIMTAR. Only male gender (P = 0.02) and systolic blood pressure (P = 0.002) in baseline variables were associated with an elevated CIMTAR for the entire population. Among those not taking lipid-lowering therapy at baseline, only systolic blood pressure remained significant (P = 0.0002). Correlations between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level and maximum carotid wall thickness/CIMTAR were weak for the entire population (r = −0.17/r = −0.12, respectively). Measure of maximum carotid wall thickness may select patients earlier for treatment than traditional risk factors. The addition of CIMTAR to risk algorithms may permit a single-point assignation of subsequent vascular risk that is more efficacious than traditional risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3489811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34898112012-11-08 Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population Callahan, A S Szarek, Michael Patton, John W Sillesen, Anne-Sophie Jones, Abrill Churchwell, Keith Holliday, H Douglas Brain Behav Original Research Maximum carotid artery wall thickness was utilized in a primary prevention population and compared with baseline risk factors. Carotid wall thickness was measured between the blood–intima and media–adventitia interfaces by B-mode ultrasonography using software calipers at points of protrusion. Long-axis measures were confirmed by short-axis assessment. The maximum carotid wall thickness for each subject was divided by age in years to yield an annual accretion rate (called carotid intima–media thickness accretion rate [CIMTAR]). The entire study population was then divided by median CIMTAR to investigate the association with baseline variables used in standard risk assessments with the bifurcated groups. Traditional risk factors such as age, diabetes, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and obesity were not associated with greater than median CIMTAR. Only male gender (P = 0.02) and systolic blood pressure (P = 0.002) in baseline variables were associated with an elevated CIMTAR for the entire population. Among those not taking lipid-lowering therapy at baseline, only systolic blood pressure remained significant (P = 0.0002). Correlations between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level and maximum carotid wall thickness/CIMTAR were weak for the entire population (r = −0.17/r = −0.12, respectively). Measure of maximum carotid wall thickness may select patients earlier for treatment than traditional risk factors. The addition of CIMTAR to risk algorithms may permit a single-point assignation of subsequent vascular risk that is more efficacious than traditional risk factors. Blackwell Publishing Inc 2012-09 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3489811/ /pubmed/23139904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.82 Text en Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Research
Callahan, A S
Szarek, Michael
Patton, John W
Sillesen, Anne-Sophie
Jones, Abrill
Churchwell, Keith
Holliday, H Douglas
Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population
title Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population
title_full Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population
title_fullStr Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population
title_full_unstemmed Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population
title_short Maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population
title_sort maximum carotid artery wall thickness and risk factors in a young primary prevention population
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23139904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.82
work_keys_str_mv AT callahanas maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation
AT szarekmichael maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation
AT pattonjohnw maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation
AT sillesenannesophie maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation
AT jonesabrill maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation
AT churchwellkeith maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation
AT hollidayhdouglas maximumcarotidarterywallthicknessandriskfactorsinayoungprimarypreventionpopulation