Cargando…

The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010

BACKGROUND: Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, Antonius, Großmann, Nadine, Linde, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22702476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-58
_version_ 1782248796559769600
author Schneider, Antonius
Großmann, Nadine
Linde, Klaus
author_facet Schneider, Antonius
Großmann, Nadine
Linde, Klaus
author_sort Schneider, Antonius
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and systematic reviews from German academic family medicine published between 2000 and 2010. METHODS: Publications were identified by searching the database Scopus and screening publication lists of family medicine divisions or institutes. Papers had to report original primary research studies or systematic reviews; at least one of the authors had to be affiliated to a German academic family medicine division or institute. RESULTS: 794 articles were included. The number of publications increased steadily starting from 107 in the period from 2000 to 2003, to 273 from 2004 to 2007, and finally to 414 from 2008 to 2010. Less than 25% were published in English in the first period. This proportion increased to 60.6% from 2008 to 2010. Articles published in a journal without impact factor decreased from 59.8% to 31.9%. Nevertheless, even in the most recent period only 31.6% of all articles were published in a journal with an impact factor above 2. The median impact factor increased from 0 in the first period to 1.2 in the last. CONCLUSIONS: The output of original research publications from academic research divisions and institutes for general practice in Germany greatly increased during the last decade. However, professionalism of German primary care research still needs to be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3489844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34898442012-11-06 The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010 Schneider, Antonius Großmann, Nadine Linde, Klaus BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and systematic reviews from German academic family medicine published between 2000 and 2010. METHODS: Publications were identified by searching the database Scopus and screening publication lists of family medicine divisions or institutes. Papers had to report original primary research studies or systematic reviews; at least one of the authors had to be affiliated to a German academic family medicine division or institute. RESULTS: 794 articles were included. The number of publications increased steadily starting from 107 in the period from 2000 to 2003, to 273 from 2004 to 2007, and finally to 414 from 2008 to 2010. Less than 25% were published in English in the first period. This proportion increased to 60.6% from 2008 to 2010. Articles published in a journal without impact factor decreased from 59.8% to 31.9%. Nevertheless, even in the most recent period only 31.6% of all articles were published in a journal with an impact factor above 2. The median impact factor increased from 0 in the first period to 1.2 in the last. CONCLUSIONS: The output of original research publications from academic research divisions and institutes for general practice in Germany greatly increased during the last decade. However, professionalism of German primary care research still needs to be developed. BioMed Central 2012-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3489844/ /pubmed/22702476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-58 Text en Copyright ©2012 Schneider et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schneider, Antonius
Großmann, Nadine
Linde, Klaus
The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010
title The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010
title_full The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010
title_fullStr The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010
title_full_unstemmed The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010
title_short The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010
title_sort development of general practice as an academic discipline in germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22702476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-58
work_keys_str_mv AT schneiderantonius thedevelopmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010
AT großmannnadine thedevelopmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010
AT lindeklaus thedevelopmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010
AT schneiderantonius developmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010
AT großmannnadine developmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010
AT lindeklaus developmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010