Cargando…
The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010
BACKGROUND: Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and sys...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22702476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-58 |
_version_ | 1782248796559769600 |
---|---|
author | Schneider, Antonius Großmann, Nadine Linde, Klaus |
author_facet | Schneider, Antonius Großmann, Nadine Linde, Klaus |
author_sort | Schneider, Antonius |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and systematic reviews from German academic family medicine published between 2000 and 2010. METHODS: Publications were identified by searching the database Scopus and screening publication lists of family medicine divisions or institutes. Papers had to report original primary research studies or systematic reviews; at least one of the authors had to be affiliated to a German academic family medicine division or institute. RESULTS: 794 articles were included. The number of publications increased steadily starting from 107 in the period from 2000 to 2003, to 273 from 2004 to 2007, and finally to 414 from 2008 to 2010. Less than 25% were published in English in the first period. This proportion increased to 60.6% from 2008 to 2010. Articles published in a journal without impact factor decreased from 59.8% to 31.9%. Nevertheless, even in the most recent period only 31.6% of all articles were published in a journal with an impact factor above 2. The median impact factor increased from 0 in the first period to 1.2 in the last. CONCLUSIONS: The output of original research publications from academic research divisions and institutes for general practice in Germany greatly increased during the last decade. However, professionalism of German primary care research still needs to be developed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3489844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34898442012-11-06 The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010 Schneider, Antonius Großmann, Nadine Linde, Klaus BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and systematic reviews from German academic family medicine published between 2000 and 2010. METHODS: Publications were identified by searching the database Scopus and screening publication lists of family medicine divisions or institutes. Papers had to report original primary research studies or systematic reviews; at least one of the authors had to be affiliated to a German academic family medicine division or institute. RESULTS: 794 articles were included. The number of publications increased steadily starting from 107 in the period from 2000 to 2003, to 273 from 2004 to 2007, and finally to 414 from 2008 to 2010. Less than 25% were published in English in the first period. This proportion increased to 60.6% from 2008 to 2010. Articles published in a journal without impact factor decreased from 59.8% to 31.9%. Nevertheless, even in the most recent period only 31.6% of all articles were published in a journal with an impact factor above 2. The median impact factor increased from 0 in the first period to 1.2 in the last. CONCLUSIONS: The output of original research publications from academic research divisions and institutes for general practice in Germany greatly increased during the last decade. However, professionalism of German primary care research still needs to be developed. BioMed Central 2012-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3489844/ /pubmed/22702476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-58 Text en Copyright ©2012 Schneider et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schneider, Antonius Großmann, Nadine Linde, Klaus The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010 |
title | The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010 |
title_full | The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010 |
title_fullStr | The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010 |
title_full_unstemmed | The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010 |
title_short | The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010 |
title_sort | development of general practice as an academic discipline in germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22702476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-58 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schneiderantonius thedevelopmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010 AT großmannnadine thedevelopmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010 AT lindeklaus thedevelopmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010 AT schneiderantonius developmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010 AT großmannnadine developmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010 AT lindeklaus developmentofgeneralpracticeasanacademicdisciplineingermanyananalysisofresearchoutputbetween2000and2010 |